Kwame Brown Sues Financial Advisor For Allegedly Stealing $17.4 Million

malbaker86

Gators
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
55,608
Reputation
6,995
Daps
124,025
Reppin
Jacksonville, FL
I know I will sound like a racist here but real talk a financial advisor named Michelle Marquez? Sounds more like a female who sucked him dry in more ways than one :mjgrin: If you don't know what to do with your money take half and buy stabilized apartment buildings, take 20% and buy blue chip stocks, another 20% in US bonds, and keep 10% in an interest bearing account that you only withdraw the interest from for your day to day activities. I done seen firsthand how this happens in Miami, they get these hoes to s*ck and f*ck you, promoters to show you around town, these same hoes linked up with these CAC scammers that drain these NBA players for everything they got. I remember reading a story about how a lot of these chicks that NBA players f*ck on the side are linked to pimps controlled by the very owners of the team. Once you get signed up they try to get you to give up all the dollars you just got. How we still slaves in 2016 :scusthov:

Is that what you are doing?
 

brick james

John piffington
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
1,876
Reputation
170
Daps
4,001
[QUOTE="brick james, post: 29500616, member: 1269"]Breh, do you think anyone who invested in Madoffs fund did weeks of research into the fund? It was very evidently a scam that lots of people called before he got popped.

In 1999, it took someone 4 minutes to conclude that Bernie Madoff was lying about his returns, and that person reported him to the sec.


All rich and white 20, 000 of them? :usure: oh the internet..... :laugh:[/QUOTE]

Like I said, it took someone 4 minutes to realize he was a fraud in addition to the dozens of complaints filed to the sec. If you invested with Madoff you didn't do any due diligence what's so ever.
 

panopticon

Superstar
Joined
Nov 28, 2016
Messages
5,435
Reputation
2,132
Daps
26,468
So how do you explain Madoff ripping off established, educated, well off, older white businessmen to the tune of billions of dollars.... are you saying that these men who have been successful businessmen for decades should have used google for 10 days to avoid getting ripped off by Madoff? :jbhmm:
:comeon:

There's a lot more to the Madoff story.

Every single investor in Madoff's fund was what's considered an "accredited investor." That means they're "big boys" - they're supposed to do their own due diligence, and aren't afforded the same protections as small-time individual investors saving up for their retirement.

The vast majority of those investors knew that the size, stability, and longevity of the returns he was generating were literally impossible.

Their bet was that Madoff was utilizing insider information - connections with desk traders at banks, large mutual funds, etc. to generate his profits through having prior knowledge of the trades that would be made on behalf of small-time investors.

All the way back in 1999, a forensic accountant named Harry Markopolos alerted the SEC that Madoff Securities was a straight up fraud:

https://www.sec.gov/news/studies/2009/oig-509/exhibit-0293.pdf

Barron's even ran an article in 2001 with quotes from several major hedge fund managers saying that Madoff's purported strategy was impossible for them to replicate - that by doing what he said he did, and backtesting it against known market movements, the profits his fund was "generating" couldn't possibly be real

Don't Ask, Don't Tell: Bernie Madoff Attracts Skeptics in 2001

The reality is that most of Madoff's investors assumed he was doing something illegal to generate such consistently high returns (with such low fees compared to his competitors). What they didn't assume was that he was just running a standard Ponzi scheme - paying old investors with new investors' money.

The Ponzi he was running remained so successful for so long because there weren't ever many redemptions from his fund - it was tough to get "in" to Madoff's fund, and once you had your money there, there wasn't any other money manager around capable of generating such consistent "returns."

It got so ridiculous that people would invest their money with Madoff, then turn around and borrow against that money and the aggregated returns from a commercial bank - then take that borrowed money and go out and speculate on real estate, other equities, etc. After all, when you've got an asset (investment in Madoff's fund) that's generating such stable returns, why not leverage it into other speculative activity? Some of these people would actually borrow against Madoff investments, turn around, and invest that borrowed money right back into Madoff's fund - paying the interest on their loan with Madoff's "returns" and pocketing the spread.

But when 2009 hit, and all of Madoff's investors saw their levered assets take huge hits, they had to break open their "piggy bank." That was their investment in Madoff's fund. All of a sudden, all at once, everybody wanted their money back. That exposed the Ponzi scheme - and the rest is is history.

Nobody who invested with that guy deserves an ounce of sympathy. They knew he was a crook, they knew exactly what they were doing - they just thought he was their crook.

Don't let the nice elderly couple they featured on 60 minutes or whatever fool you. :francis:
 

Ethnic Vagina Finder

The Great Paper Chaser
Bushed
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
53,950
Reputation
2,486
Daps
152,935
Reppin
North Jersey but I miss Cali :sadcam:
Ex-NBA star Kwame Brown is suing his financial advisors for fraud and claiming they stole $17.4 million of his money.


According to court documents obtained by The Blast, Brown — who was the #1 pick of the 2001 NBA Draft straight out of high school — is suing Merrill Lynch, Bank of America and a financial advisor named Michelle Marquez.

Brown claims he was a client of the defendants from 2004 until 2017. Brown says they were to handle all his financial matters, collect his NBA income, invest his money and trade certain stocks for him, but only to invest or trade with his consent.

The suit claims Marquez began overseeing his account and, on several occasions, began investing Brown’s money into various projects and trading stocks without his permission.

Brown claims Marquez even opened several bank accounts under his name, without his knowledge and without giving him access to the accounts. He believes she was depositing his money into those accounts and began investing and trading his money while collecting a commission for herself.

According to the lawsuit, Brown claims he took out a $1.1 million loan in 2006 and instructed Marquez to pay off the balance of the loan right away. In 2015, Brown says he learned Marquez did not pay off the loan and instead converted the unpaid portion of the loan into a line of credit.

Kwame Brown says he never authorized that and claims he suffered a massive financial loss due to Marquez’s actions.

In 2017, Brown says he called Marquez to talk to her about his finances but could not get her on the phone despite previously being able to get ahold of her.

After several conversations with another employee of defendants, he was told he had no money with Merrill Lynch or Bank of America. The employee told Brown that he had signed authorization documents for defendants to invest, trade or otherwise control his monies.

But Brown believes the documents bearing his name were forged. He says he hired forensic experts to look at the alleged signatures, all of which were determined to be forgeries.

Brown claims he had deposited over $17,400,000 with defendants, which he claims was mishandled or misappropriated through fraud.

The lawsuit — filed on Thursday in Los Angeles by the NBA star’s attorney, Corey Boddie — is seeking for the return of Brown’s $17 million plus further damages.

We reached out to Marquez for comment — so far, no word back.

Brown played in the NBA from 2001-2013 and, according to Basketball Reference, made just under $64 million in his career.




https://www.google.com/amp/s/theblast.com/kwame-brown-fraud-lawsuit/amp/

1. He stayed with him for 13 years :mjpls:
2. You can't tell someone to invest, the sue when they make bad investments.
3. If it took you 13 years to figure out they were shady... that's YOUR fault.
 

Ethnic Vagina Finder

The Great Paper Chaser
Bushed
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
53,950
Reputation
2,486
Daps
152,935
Reppin
North Jersey but I miss Cali :sadcam:
:comeon:

There's a lot more to the Madoff story.

Every single investor in Madoff's fund was what's considered an "accredited investor." That means they're "big boys" - they're supposed to do their own due diligence, and aren't afforded the same protections as small-time individual investors saving up for their retirement.

The vast majority of those investors knew that the size, stability, and longevity of the returns he was generating were literally impossible.

Their bet was that Madoff was utilizing insider information - connections with desk traders at banks, large mutual funds, etc. to generate his profits through having prior knowledge of the trades that would be made on behalf of small-time investors.

All the way back in 1999, a forensic accountant named Harry Markopolos alerted the SEC that Madoff Securities was a straight up fraud:

https://www.sec.gov/news/studies/2009/oig-509/exhibit-0293.pdf

Barron's even ran an article in 2001 with quotes from several major hedge fund managers saying that Madoff's purported strategy was impossible for them to replicate - that by doing what he said he did, and backtesting it against known market movements, the profits his fund was "generating" couldn't possibly be real

Don't Ask, Don't Tell: Bernie Madoff Attracts Skeptics in 2001

The reality is that most of Madoff's investors assumed he was doing something illegal to generate such consistently high returns (with such low fees compared to his competitors). What they didn't assume was that he was just running a standard Ponzi scheme - paying old investors with new investors' money.

The Ponzi he was running remained so successful for so long because there weren't ever many redemptions from his fund - it was tough to get "in" to Madoff's fund, and once you had your money there, there wasn't any other money manager around capable of generating such consistent "returns."

It got so ridiculous that people would invest their money with Madoff, then turn around and borrow against that money and the aggregated returns from a commercial bank - then take that borrowed money and go out and speculate on real estate, other equities, etc. After all, when you've got an asset (investment in Madoff's fund) that's generating such stable returns, why not leverage it into other speculative activity? Some of these people would actually borrow against Madoff investments, turn around, and invest that borrowed money right back into Madoff's fund - paying the interest on their loan with Madoff's "returns" and pocketing the spread.

But when 2009 hit, and all of Madoff's investors saw their levered assets take huge hits, they had to break open their "piggy bank." That was their investment in Madoff's fund. All of a sudden, all at once, everybody wanted their money back. That exposed the Ponzi scheme - and the rest is is history.

Nobody who invested with that guy deserves an ounce of sympathy. They knew he was a crook, they knew exactly what they were doing - they just thought he was their crook.

Don't let the nice elderly couple they featured on 60 minutes or whatever fool you. :francis:

A LOT of those investors KNEW those consistent returns were too good to be true but they were greedy. Madoff even admitted that much. He knew they were all greedy b*stards and which helped him justify what he did.
 

panopticon

Superstar
Joined
Nov 28, 2016
Messages
5,435
Reputation
2,132
Daps
26,468
A LOT of those investors KNEW those consistent returns were too good to be true but they were greedy. Madoff even admitted that much. He knew they were all greedy b*stards and which helped him justify what he did.
Bulls make money :ehh:

Bears make money :obama:

Pigs get slaughtered :demonic:
I don't have time for those whose greed gets em got :hubie:
 

pete clemenza

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
34,916
Reputation
2,961
Daps
84,406
Reppin
Cali
[QUOTE="brick james, post: 29500616, member: 1269"]Breh, do you think anyone who invested in Madoffs fund did weeks of research into the fund? It was very evidently a scam that lots of people called before he got popped.

In 1999, it took someone 4 minutes to conclude that Bernie Madoff was lying about his returns, and that person reported him to the sec.


All rich and white 20, 000 of them? :usure: oh the internet..... :laugh:

And most of them were Jews too. They usually know about their money. Was too greedy knowing damn well those returns were too good to be true.

Madoff ripped off his own people. First time I really heard of a jew robbing his fellow kind like that. :wow:
 
Joined
Jul 26, 2012
Messages
42,841
Reputation
2,512
Daps
104,494
Reppin
NULL
:comeon:

There's a lot more to the Madoff story.

Every single investor in Madoff's fund was what's considered an "accredited investor." That means they're "big boys" - they're supposed to do their own due diligence, and aren't afforded the same protections as small-time individual investors saving up for their retirement.

The vast majority of those investors knew that the size, stability, and longevity of the returns he was generating were literally impossible.

Their bet was that Madoff was utilizing insider information - connections with desk traders at banks, large mutual funds, etc. to generate his profits through having prior knowledge of the trades that would be made on behalf of small-time investors.

All the way back in 1999, a forensic accountant named Harry Markopolos alerted the SEC that Madoff Securities was a straight up fraud:

https://www.sec.gov/news/studies/2009/oig-509/exhibit-0293.pdf

Barron's even ran an article in 2001 with quotes from several major hedge fund managers saying that Madoff's purported strategy was impossible for them to replicate - that by doing what he said he did, and backtesting it against known market movements, the profits his fund was "generating" couldn't possibly be real

Don't Ask, Don't Tell: Bernie Madoff Attracts Skeptics in 2001

The reality is that most of Madoff's investors assumed he was doing something illegal to generate such consistently high returns (with such low fees compared to his competitors). What they didn't assume was that he was just running a standard Ponzi scheme - paying old investors with new investors' money.

The Ponzi he was running remained so successful for so long because there weren't ever many redemptions from his fund - it was tough to get "in" to Madoff's fund, and once you had your money there, there wasn't any other money manager around capable of generating such consistent "returns."

It got so ridiculous that people would invest their money with Madoff, then turn around and borrow against that money and the aggregated returns from a commercial bank - then take that borrowed money and go out and speculate on real estate, other equities, etc. After all, when you've got an asset (investment in Madoff's fund) that's generating such stable returns, why not leverage it into other speculative activity? Some of these people would actually borrow against Madoff investments, turn around, and invest that borrowed money right back into Madoff's fund - paying the interest on their loan with Madoff's "returns" and pocketing the spread.

But when 2009 hit, and all of Madoff's investors saw their levered assets take huge hits, they had to break open their "piggy bank." That was their investment in Madoff's fund. All of a sudden, all at once, everybody wanted their money back. That exposed the Ponzi scheme - and the rest is is history.

Nobody who invested with that guy deserves an ounce of sympathy. They knew he was a crook, they knew exactly what they were doing - they just thought he was their crook.

Don't let the nice elderly couple they featured on 60 minutes or whatever fool you. :francis:

There is absolutely no doubt that people were in the know........ but a lot were not, and had no inkling that something illegal was occurring...... the point I'm stressing is that so called "financially" adept get gamed as well, so there is no point in singling out young black males unless you have an agenda..... shout out to the Stanford Financial group and Greenwood and Walsh
 

King Poetic

In My Lifetime
Supporter
Joined
Feb 15, 2013
Messages
94,511
Reputation
18,472
Daps
462,135
Reppin
*The New Big Ten*
I'd say lawyers watching lawyers,watching accountants...

i think robert deniro quote in casino said it best

" everybody's gotta watch everybody else. Since the players are looking to beat the casino, the dealers are watching the players. The box men are watching the dealers. The floor men are watching the box men. The pit bosses are watching the floor men. The shift bosses are watching the pit bosses. The casino manager is watching the shift bosses. I'm watching the casino manager. And the eye-in-the-sky is watching us all "



**************** this should apply to athletes and their way of thinking about financial advisors, family, friends, lawyers, etc..
 
Top