I love how the Lakers supposedly had basically the two greatest players in history that year as well as one of the greatest coaches of all time......and yet went out 110-82 in the WCSF to a team consisting of Tim Duncan, a 20yo french midget who wasn't even all-star level yet, and a bunch of role players. Spurs weren't even deep that year, they only had 3 guys averaging more than 10ppg and basically played a 7-man rotation.
Some of y'all gotta explain how a team of Tim Duncan and some role players KILLED supposedly the two most unstoppable players in history, especially the way y'all talk like Duncan wasn't in either of their league.
And all this shyt about Shaq being unstoppable....he was incredibly dominant but it always needs to be remembered that 2000 Shaq would have lost to Portland if Sabonis and Grant weren't called for a bunch of touch fouls in Game 7, 2002 Shaq would have lost to Sacramento if the refs didn't openly throw Game 6, 2003 Shaq DID lose to the Spurs, and 2004 Shaq DID lose to the Pistons. And in those series he was guarded by old broken Sabonis, 6'9" 215lb Brian Grant, skinny-ass Vlade, Scott Pollard, 37yo Robinson, Duncan, and 6'7" Ben Wallace. So obviously the array of guys who can keep prime Shaq under control is broader than y'all claiming. (Unless you want to say that Shaq would have dominated if Kobe didn't shoot them out....which is only true for some of those matchups.)