Kim Kardashian issues an apology for Balenciaga

[Gloxina]

This bytch has turned into a paid tool for anti-Ye movement with the powers that be.

Men need to pick wisely when making babies with women.

Who knew?!

-Sex tape
-Playboy with mom’s support
-Image based on sex
-Willing to be pregnant with his child while finalizing a divorce with her then husband

Who could’ve guessed what type of chick she was??


Guess he should’ve chosen better.

 

[Rell84shots]

IMO the teddy bears was light. If it was just that this would be a non-story. It’s the paperwork referencing that court case that really makes this nasty.

If I see a kid holding an S&M bear I'm going to be disgusted.

Kanye need to get his house in order before he speaks on others

He's not in that house anymore, they made sure to keep him far away from them so this is all on Kim.

 

[JoelB]

IMO the teddy bears was light. If it was just that this would be a non-story. It’s the paperwork referencing that court case that really makes this nasty.

eh...kids holding them shyts is pretty nasty itself...and all the other props related to the shoot...the couyrtpaper is the nastiest but them other shyts is pretty bad too.

damn all i knew about was the pics. What paperwork yall talkin bout?

 

[69 others]

did these pedos even apologize on their own behalf

 

[SithLawd]

damn all i knew about was the pics. What paperwork yall talkin bout?

Balenciaga apologises after ‘disgusting’ ads of children holding ‘bondage’ teddy bears spark backlash

Critics also noticed documents from Supreme Court cases on child pornography were used as props in the campaign

news.yahoo.com

Others claimed that a visible portion of the court documents displayed next to the Balenciaga handbag make reference to another Supreme Court case, Ashcroft v Free Speech Coalition. In the 2002 case, the court struck down a portion of the Child Pornography Prevention Act (CPPA) of 1996, deciding that virtual child pornography is protected speech.

 

[BobbyWojak]

Guess he should’ve chosen better.

I mean, yeah, he definitely should have.

 

[JoelB]

Balenciaga apologises after ‘disgusting’ ads of children holding ‘bondage’ teddy bears spark backlash

Critics also noticed documents from Supreme Court cases on child pornography were used as props in the campaign

news.yahoo.com

Others claimed that a visible portion of the court documents displayed next to the Balenciaga handbag make reference to another Supreme Court case, Ashcroft v Free Speech Coalition. In the 2002 case, the court struck down a portion of the Child Pornography Prevention Act (CPPA) of 1996, deciding that virtual child pornography is protected speech.

 

[L&HH]

eh...kids holding them shyts is pretty nasty itself...and all the other props related to the shoot...the couyrtpaper is the nastiest but them other shyts is pretty bad too.

Just looking at those bears I didn’t see anything bdsm. I thought it was some punk rock type shyt. I see how someone could interpret it as bdsm I guess. Im not hip to all these esoteric symbolisms so idk what anything else there could have meant. But that’s why I say it’s a non story because they could have argued a different interpretation than what the public was saying. The reference to the court case can’t be argued that’s pretty blatant and is what legitimized everyone’s outrage to me.

 

[BobbyWojak]

Yahoo news published the same thing

Balenciaga apologises after ‘disgusting’ ads of children holding ‘bondage’ teddy bears spark backlash

Critics also noticed documents from Supreme Court cases on child pornography were used as props in the campaign

news.yahoo.com

Thanks, this is much better

Another shock marketing campaign from euro concept artists, but the conspiracy people will run wild with it.

 

[DaHNIC82]

And that idiot ye built a family with this broad

 

[Unknown Poster]

There’s Something Terribly Wrong With Balenciaga and the Rabbit Hole Goes Deep

Deeper dive. Not for the faint of heart. One of the images in their campaign didn't have kids in the photo but a hand bag placed on top of documents from a Supreme Court decision. That decision ruled that banning "virtual" child porn was a violation of free speech.

So real child porn is banned but if they use CGI or computer graphics it's legal, if I understood correctly. This case was a victory of sorts for pedos, so what message was Balenciaga trying to send by including it in their ad?

This website though...

 

[Ciggavelli]

And that idiot ye built a family with this broad

I think it’s clear Kanye is a bad actor and somebody who is bad at judging people’s character. Trump, Fuentes, Kim, etc.

 

[Standing on business]

And that idiot ye built a family with this broad

 

[BobbyWojak]

But that’s why I say it’s a non story because they could have argued a different interpretation than what the public was saying. The reference to the court case can’t be argued that’s pretty blatant and is what legitimized everyone’s outrage to me.

There's also an ad with a Michael Borremans art book visible in the background, which lends more credence to this being some shock marketing thing, Borremans has a history of controversial paintings portraying children and cherubs. You don't put a book like that in the photo by accident while this teddy bear thing is going on.

 

[Ciggavelli]

There's also an ad with a Michael Borremans art book visible in the background, which lends more credence to this being some shock marketing thing, Borremans has a history of controversial paintings portraying children and cherubs. You don't put a book like that in the photo by accident while this teddy bear thing is going on.

I’m surprised more conspiracy heads haven’t jumped on this yet. It literally falls into their playbook. shyts blatant.