Kim Kardashian issues an apology for Balenciaga

Deltron

The Return
Top Supporter
Supporter
Joined
May 27, 2012
Messages
49,270
Reputation
21,528
Daps
150,177
Reppin
The year 3030
aka she's still gonna rep them and get paid by them. she's only speaking out to cover her on ass until this shyt dies down.

she appreciated their bullshyt apology and blaming/suing the photographer/agency? They really trying to frame it like they didn't realize it was some :sitdown: creeper ass campaign? :childplease:

this billion dollar company didn't check out the campaign before greenlighting it, huh?
 

BobbyWojak

Superstar
Joined
Sep 14, 2019
Messages
8,147
Reputation
1,544
Daps
28,232
There’s Something Terribly Wrong With Balenciaga and the Rabbit Hole Goes Deep

Deeper dive. Not for the faint of heart. One of the images in their campaign didn't have kids in the photo but a hand bag placed on top of documents from a Supreme Court decision. That decision ruled that banning "virtual" child porn was a violation of free speech.

So real child porn is banned but if they use CGI or computer graphics it's legal, if I understood correctly. This case was a victory of sorts for pedos, so what message was Balenciaga trying to send by including it in their ad?
I clicked on that link thinking it was a news outlet, that website is not trustworthy and full of all types of 'hollyweird' conspiracy bullshyt, saying Kanye's trainer was an 'MKULTRA handler' and Doja Cat's satanic rituals what the fukk.

The blog's motto is 'symbols rule the world, not words or laws':what:

Where did you find this nonsense?:russ:
 

SithLawd

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Oct 6, 2014
Messages
6,633
Reputation
969
Daps
35,710
There’s Something Terribly Wrong With Balenciaga and the Rabbit Hole Goes Deep

Deeper dive. Not for the faint of heart. One of the images in their campaign didn't have kids in the photo but a hand bag placed on top of documents from a Supreme Court decision. That decision ruled that banning "virtual" child porn was a violation of free speech.

So real child porn is banned but if they use CGI or computer graphics it's legal, if I understood correctly. This case was a victory of sorts for pedos, so what message was Balenciaga trying to send by including it in their ad?
Fam WTF :gucci::dahell::dahell:
 

L&HH

Veteran
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
53,305
Reputation
5,830
Daps
161,785
Reppin
PG x MD
412c134bd59e437fadcda8a5a7fc78bf_md.jpg


Kids holding s&m themed teddy bears
IMO the teddy bears was light. If it was just that this would be a non-story. It’s the paperwork referencing that court case that really makes this nasty.
 

SithLawd

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Oct 6, 2014
Messages
6,633
Reputation
969
Daps
35,710
I clicked on that link thinking it was a news outlet, that website is not trustworthy and full of all types of 'hollyweird' conspiracy bullshyt, saying Kanye's trainer was an 'MKULTRA handler' and Doja Cat's satanic rituals what the fukk.

The blog's motto is 'symbols rule the world, not words or laws':what:

Where did you find this nonsense?:russ:
Stop deflecting :comeon:
Yahoo news published the same thing

 

Deltron

The Return
Top Supporter
Supporter
Joined
May 27, 2012
Messages
49,270
Reputation
21,528
Daps
150,177
Reppin
The year 3030
IMO the teddy bears was light. If it was just that this would be a non-story. It’s the paperwork referencing that court case that really makes this nasty.
eh...kids holding them shyts is pretty nasty itself...and all the other props related to the shoot...the couyrtpaper is the nastiest but them other shyts is pretty bad too.
 
Top