Kim Kardashian issues an apology for Balenciaga

Brehcepticon

Adeptus Brehstartes
Supporter
Joined
Aug 6, 2017
Messages
8,706
Reputation
6,786
Daps
43,570
There is literally nothing this chick won’t do for a dollar!
VONryav.png
 

BobbyWojak

Superstar
Joined
Sep 14, 2019
Messages
8,147
Reputation
1,544
Daps
28,232
You can believe who you want, since there is no consensus on the issue, even among chinese themselves. Even your professor BELIEVES that the quote is apocryphal. He can't say for sure.

Some people attribute it to Confucius; some people don't.

In any case, it wasn't something invented by that website.

There is more contextual evidence that Confucius didn't write that quote, a literal translation is not enough. 'Even among Chinese themselves' fukking Baidu and 'Chinese websites':russ:. At least my source is referencing the actual material in question. By writing, 'you don't know Confucius?' you're implying that the blog's motto is deeper than some ridiculous conspiratorial assertion by Vigilant Citizen, and it isn't. I never said they made up the quote, my point was the quote is a point against them being rational people.

This is the type of content you're attempting to legitimize by defending their use of that misquote.

0xQsHrk.jpg
 
Last edited:

African Peasant

Veteran
Joined
Oct 18, 2014
Messages
19,869
Reputation
3,166
Daps
72,093
There is more contextual evidence that Confucius didn't write that quote, a literal translation is not enough. 'Even among Chinese themselves' fukking Baidu and 'Chinese websites':russ:. At least my source is referencing the actual material in question. By writing, 'you don't know Confucius?' you're implying that the blog's motto is deeper than some ridiculous conspiratorial assertion by Vigilant Citizen, and it isn't. I never said they made up the quote, my point was the quote is a point against them being rational people.

This is the type of content you're attempting to legitimize by defending their use of that misquote.

0xQsHrk.jpg
No, I'm implying that the quote is ATTRIBUTED to Confucius, even among Chinese.

And there is no evidence about the paternity of that quote. Even your Holy PHD professor is saying that he believes that the quote is an apocryphe. There is no definitive answer about it, especially not in a westerner blog. And even your professor admits that you can find thing of similar or close nature in Confucius' more certain writings.

I'm not attempting to legitimize anything. I'm just pointing out the fact that the quote is not some bozo saying as you tried to imply. Talking about symbolism, there are tons of serious studies about it, does not mean you legitimize obscur right wing sites. Get a grip.
 

BobbyWojak

Superstar
Joined
Sep 14, 2019
Messages
8,147
Reputation
1,544
Daps
28,232
No, I'm implying that the quote is ATTRIBUTED to Confucius, even among Chinese.

And there is no evidence about the paternity of that quote. Even your Holy PHD professor is saying that he believes that the quote is an apocryphe. There is no definitive answer about it, especially not in a westerner blog. And even your professor admits that you can find thing of similar or close nature in Confucius' more certain writings.

I'm not attempting to legitimize anything. I'm just pointing out the fact that the quote is not some bozo saying as you tried to imply. Talking about symbolism, there are tons of serious studies about it, does not mean you legitimize obscur right wing sites. Get a grip.
If there is no definitive answer about the origin of a quote, it's common sense to play it safe, not claim a philosopher wrote it like you did earlier. The contextual evidence (his supposed writings) point to this being a misquote more than it does anything else.

agree to disagree
 

African Peasant

Veteran
Joined
Oct 18, 2014
Messages
19,869
Reputation
3,166
Daps
72,093
If there is no definitive answer about the origin of a quote, it's common sense to play it safe, not claim a philosopher wrote it like you did earlier. The contextual evidence (his supposed writings) point to this being a misquote more than it does anything else.

agree to disagree

True. But since the origin of the quote are unclear, despite being tied to Confucius, it can't be used to disqualify people using it. It's not like someone quoting Boosie or Alex Jones dumb ass quote.

Fair enough.
 

thewarrior05

All Star
Joined
Jun 5, 2012
Messages
2,939
Reputation
-1,630
Daps
5,624
Reppin
NULL
There’s Something Terribly Wrong With Balenciaga and the Rabbit Hole Goes Deep

Deeper dive. Not for the faint of heart. One of the images in their campaign didn't have kids in the photo but a hand bag placed on top of documents from a Supreme Court decision. That decision ruled that banning "virtual" child porn was a violation of free speech.

So real child porn is banned but if they use CGI or computer graphics it's legal, if I understood correctly. This case was a victory of sorts for pedos, so what message was Balenciaga trying to send by including it in their ad?
This is 95% of business and Hollywood there is a reason why this world is fukked up
 
  • Dap
Reactions: QBN

YouMadd?

Chakra Daddy
Bushed
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
24,192
Reputation
1,585
Daps
69,864
Reppin
California
412c134bd59e437fadcda8a5a7fc78bf_md.jpg


Kids holding s&m themed teddy bears
And Teddy Bears are symbols for Pedos too...
There’s Something Terribly Wrong With Balenciaga and the Rabbit Hole Goes Deep

Deeper dive. Not for the faint of heart. One of the images in their campaign didn't have kids in the photo but a hand bag placed on top of documents from a Supreme Court decision. That decision ruled that banning "virtual" child porn was a violation of free speech.

So real child porn is banned but if they use CGI or computer graphics it's legal, if I understood correctly. This case was a victory of sorts for pedos, so what message was Balenciaga trying to send by including it in their ad?
Link
 
  • Dap
Reactions: QBN

Rell84shots

Veteran
Joined
Jan 8, 2014
Messages
41,582
Reputation
5,871
Daps
164,357
Reppin
Dallas, TX
But why would they want to use that?
Because these major companies are complete sickos. There's a reason why so many people in Hollywood are fukked up. Feldman & Haim were telling the absolute truth about what goes on. I guarantee you that the Balenciaga corporation has the list of every know pedophile from actors to politicians.
 

richaveli83

Veteran
Joined
Sep 10, 2015
Messages
55,000
Reputation
20,786
Daps
271,085
Reppin
Dallas, Texas but living in Houston, Texas
I truly don't understand why black folks wear this Euro trash designer bullshyt and brag about it like it's great. All that shyt looks goofy and demonic. Not surprised at all they pulled this shyt in the first place,
Someone will actually pay about $1,000 for some garbage like this:
26SNEAKERS1-superJumbo-v3.jpg


Looks like some Payless shoes. :pachaha:
 

Clapsteel O'Neal

put a red dot on your head like a hindu
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
16,557
Reputation
2,994
Daps
42,344
Reppin
NULL
Just looking at those bears I didn’t see anything bdsm. I thought it was some punk rock type shyt. I see how someone could interpret it as bdsm I guess. Im not hip to all these esoteric symbolisms so idk what anything else there could have meant. But that’s why I say it’s a non story because they could have argued a different interpretation than what the public was saying. The reference to the court case can’t be argued that’s pretty blatant and is what legitimized everyone’s outrage to me.
Are you fuccin high?

You think bondage body harnesses are punk rock?

Some of you niccas are legit sheltered
 
Top