There is literally nothing this chick won’t do for a dollar!
![VONryav.png](https://i.imgur.com/VONryav.png)
There is literally nothing this chick won’t do for a dollar!
How dare this c*nt mention her children while defending some pedo shyt.
You can believe who you want, since there is no consensus on the issue, even among chinese themselves. Even your professor BELIEVES that the quote is apocryphal. He can't say for sure.
Some people attribute it to Confucius; some people don't.
In any case, it wasn't something invented by that website.
Because they probably don’t have an issue with rape of children.But why would they want to use that?
No, I'm implying that the quote is ATTRIBUTED to Confucius, even among Chinese.There is more contextual evidence that Confucius didn't write that quote, a literal translation is not enough. 'Even among Chinese themselves' fukking Baidu and 'Chinese websites'. At least my source is referencing the actual material in question. By writing, 'you don't know Confucius?' you're implying that the blog's motto is deeper than some ridiculous conspiratorial assertion by Vigilant Citizen, and it isn't. I never said they made up the quote, my point was the quote is a point against them being rational people.
This is the type of content you're attempting to legitimize by defending their use of that misquote.
![]()
If there is no definitive answer about the origin of a quote, it's common sense to play it safe, not claim a philosopher wrote it like you did earlier. The contextual evidence (his supposed writings) point to this being a misquote more than it does anything else.No, I'm implying that the quote is ATTRIBUTED to Confucius, even among Chinese.
And there is no evidence about the paternity of that quote. Even your Holy PHD professor is saying that he believes that the quote is an apocryphe. There is no definitive answer about it, especially not in a westerner blog. And even your professor admits that you can find thing of similar or close nature in Confucius' more certain writings.
I'm not attempting to legitimize anything. I'm just pointing out the fact that the quote is not some bozo saying as you tried to imply. Talking about symbolism, there are tons of serious studies about it, does not mean you legitimize obscur right wing sites. Get a grip.
If there is no definitive answer about the origin of a quote, it's common sense to play it safe, not claim a philosopher wrote it like you did earlier. The contextual evidence (his supposed writings) point to this being a misquote more than it does anything else.
agree to disagree
This is 95% of business and Hollywood there is a reason why this world is fukked upThere’s Something Terribly Wrong With Balenciaga and the Rabbit Hole Goes Deep
Deeper dive. Not for the faint of heart. One of the images in their campaign didn't have kids in the photo but a hand bag placed on top of documents from a Supreme Court decision. That decision ruled that banning "virtual" child porn was a violation of free speech.
So real child porn is banned but if they use CGI or computer graphics it's legal, if I understood correctly. This case was a victory of sorts for pedos, so what message was Balenciaga trying to send by including it in their ad?
And Teddy Bears are symbols for Pedos too...![]()
Kids holding s&m themed teddy bears
LinkThere’s Something Terribly Wrong With Balenciaga and the Rabbit Hole Goes Deep
Deeper dive. Not for the faint of heart. One of the images in their campaign didn't have kids in the photo but a hand bag placed on top of documents from a Supreme Court decision. That decision ruled that banning "virtual" child porn was a violation of free speech.
So real child porn is banned but if they use CGI or computer graphics it's legal, if I understood correctly. This case was a victory of sorts for pedos, so what message was Balenciaga trying to send by including it in their ad?
Because these major companies are complete sickos. There's a reason why so many people in Hollywood are fukked up. Feldman & Haim were telling the absolute truth about what goes on. I guarantee you that the Balenciaga corporation has the list of every know pedophile from actors to politicians.But why would they want to use that?
Someone will actually pay about $1,000 for some garbage like this:I truly don't understand why black folks wear this Euro trash designer bullshyt and brag about it like it's great. All that shyt looks goofy and demonic. Not surprised at all they pulled this shyt in the first place,
I wouldn't be surprised if they already know. It's crazy that the whole damn family was able to get on because of that wack ass sex tape.She gone have even bigger problems on her hands when her kids find out how/why she got famous.
Are you fuccin high?Just looking at those bears I didn’t see anything bdsm. I thought it was some punk rock type shyt. I see how someone could interpret it as bdsm I guess. Im not hip to all these esoteric symbolisms so idk what anything else there could have meant. But that’s why I say it’s a non story because they could have argued a different interpretation than what the public was saying. The reference to the court case can’t be argued that’s pretty blatant and is what legitimized everyone’s outrage to me.