I thought it was fantastic
. I liked it more than Oppenheimer because the last act of Oppenheimer with the trial gets hammy. Additionally, Scorsese as a director is really interested in social contradictions and dynamism. For examples, how can a man as calculated, cunning, refined, and meticulous as Ace in Casino have such a chaotic love-life? How can a group of men that delve into extreme debauchery, criminality, and wanton violence hold so much esteem in our collective consciousness (i.e., mobsters)? How can a man that vehemently states he loves his wife and children, such that, he will swear on his childrenâs lives when his fidelity is questionedâalso be will to slowly poison his wife at the prospect of money? Such a man, even his name manifests a contradiction when you consider his true constitution (i.e., Ernest/Earnest).
Like, M.S. I am also incredibly intrigued by the interplay of social contradictions as social phenomena, so this movie just really resonated with me. This shyt had me legit hating white people during the film too
. Someone said, âOh, the Osage shouldâve known how white people get down.â Listen, history shows that once youâre in close proximity with white peopleâitâs too late. Whatâs the old saying about a rooster in the hen house? Japan kept them out for a longggggggg ass time for a reason.
Lastly, M.S. doesnât really do crazy cinematography or anything, but all the cuts are so precise and sleek. He also just adds little details in his films that creates an added layer of immersion. For instance, Mollie leaving the dude that controls her funds office, and he shows her stepping on his door mat upon her exit. What does that little bit add to the story? Not much, but itâs that fine detail attuned with how people navigate the material world, which flows well as when he transitions into the next scene. Obviously, heâs a fantastic moviemaker.