Kevin Samuels Discussion Thread

[ExodusNirvana]

I hope this is once again a clear example of how KS stans are nikkas who need guidance on life or how to be Black.

 

[CoryMack]

That’s the kinda stat where I don’t even waste my time asking for supporting statistics. I just know whoever came up with it is a liar or just don’t know what the hell they’re talking about.

 

[DA_LURKA]

2:00:00
That last call and ending monologue...

 

[Neuromancer]

Only one of my friends kids. my older brothers have 3 a piece (as far as I know.) My sister has one but I think her ex has a few now.

 

[Neuromancer]

I don’t have kids because until recently it would’ve been financially irresponsible for me to do so and I’d prefer to have a kid with the woman I plan on marrying... I know that prolly sounds weird but it is what it is.

It's the right way to do it.

 

[Neuromancer]

It is in modern times and if wrong would cause people to look at Kevin funny but it did happen before:

8,000 YEARS AGO, 17 WOMEN REPRODUCED FOR EVERY ONE MAN
An analysis of modern DNA uncovers a rough dating scene after the advent of agriculture.
FRANCIE DIEP
UPDATED:
JUN 14, 2017
ORIGINAL:
MAR 17, 2015
Melissa Wilson Sayres, a computational biologist at Arizona State University, and a member of a group of scientists who uncovered this moment in prehistory by analyzing modern genes.

Another member of the research team, a biological anthropologist, hypothesizes that somehow, only a few men accumulated lots of wealth and power, leaving nothing for others. These men could then pass their wealth on to their sons, perpetuating this pattern of elitist reproductive success. Then, as more thousands of years passed, the numbers of men reproducing, compared to women, rose again. "Maybe more and more people started being successful," Wilson Sayres says. In more recent history, as a global average, about four or five women reproduced for every one man.

evolve to digest milk, for example, while most ethnic Tibetans have adaptations to deal with the lower oxygen levels at high altitudes. But if Wilson Sayres' team's hypothesis is correct, it would be one of the first instances that scientists have found of culture affecting human evolution.

The team uncovered this dip-and-rise in the male-to-female reproductive ratio by looking at DNA from more than 450 volunteers from seven world regions. Geneticists analyzed two parts of the DNA, Y-chromosome DNA and mitochondrial DNA. These don't make up a large portion of a person's genetics, but they're special because people inherit Y-chromosome DNA exclusively from their male ancestors and mitochondrial DNA exclusively from their female ancestors. By analyzing diversity in these parts, scientists are able to deduce the numbers of female and male ancestors a population has. It's always more female.

"IT WASN'T LIKE THERE WAS A MASS DEATH OF MALES. THEY WERE THERE, SO WHAT WERE THEY DOING?"
So much for what our DNA can tell us. This study, published last week in the journal Genome Research, can't directly account for why the dip occurred. Instead, the team members tried to think through other explanations. "Like was there some sort of weird virus that only affected males across the whole globe, 8,000 years ago?" Wilson Sayres asks—a hypothesis the team found unlikely.

To further test the wealth-and-power idea, the researchers plan to look for other genetic markers that would indicate that something cultural, not physical, kept those early male farmers from reproducing. Team members could also collaborate with anthropologists and archaeologists, to see if they have any clues.

Nature is a harsh taskmaster, but so, it seems, is human culture. Although the popular notion is that farming and settlement cushioned people against "survival of the fittest," this study shows that's not true. Something cultural happened 8,000 years ago that's marked us even today.

Quick Studies is an award-winning series that sheds light on new research and discoveries that change the way we look at the world.

So historical data supports this in some way.

 

[WMG the 2nd]

So this is y'all favorite pastime? Starting shyt for no reason?

Welcome to the coli

 

[KingFreeman]

Number far too low.

 

[360dagod]

18 percent is outrageus but it is probably abnormally high, most of my black male friends have no kids but on the flip side you got dudes like youngboy, future, having like 6-8 baby mamas. A lot of men are double dipping to tripple dipping.

The hypocrisy starts when these kids become teenagers and create dysfunction Partly because the father is nowhere to be found or is dysfunctional himself..

I know a dude who got 3 different bms and wasn't on good terms with 2...

Now those kids will never develop as good as they would have if the father was on at least DECENT terms with the mother...

That deadbeat lifestyle isn't for me at all..

 

[Ezekiel 25:17]

Incel talking points. One Star

 

[Ezekiel 25:17]

I think 18 percent is inaccurate, but still the majority of black men have no kids.

A black pill truth that makes the coli uncomfortable.

Wasn’t it a study that said majority of black men doesn’t have kids

This shyt ain't true either, do folks go outside? The black population is around 45,000,000. Unless we got a bunch of bums having babies, that's only reasonable explanation.

 

[Insensitive]

All this 80/20, chad, tyron, alpha, beta, blue pill, red pill, women hitting the wall, simps, Instagram hoes, only fan hoes, build a thot, dime pieces, etc... does nothing but fill people’s minds up with low vibration, low iq mindsets that keeps people weak and confused.

And most all of it is "CAC" slang.
Straight from 4Cac and Reddit.

 

[Field Marshall Bradley]

This shyt ain't true either, do folks go outside? The black population is around 45,000,000. Unless we got a bunch of bums having babies, that's only reasonable explanation.

The coli switches narratives every week.... and logic gets thrown out the window

 

[Ezekiel 25:17]

Census Bureau Releases First Ever Report on Men’s Fertility

Among men ages 20 to 29, 21.2% of white men, 24.9% of black men, 12.4% of Asian men, and 29.4% of Hispanic men are fathers.


so basically 75% of 20-29 year olds BM don’t have kids. That’s a pretty big age window, but I would like to know if somebody had the numbers for women age 20-29

If you believe this I got a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you.

 

[360dagod]

This shyt ain't true either, do folks go outside? The black population is around 45,000,000. Unless we got a bunch of bums having babies, that's only reasonable explanation.

I know at least 8-10 that are basically deadbeats or had got breeded by some..and that's off the top of my head...

Our women choose poorly bruh...