Doesn't matter. If that's the case you'd shouldn't be able to rank players highly either if you didn't see them play in real time.You saw them play in real time?
Only if you want to provide a weak argument.Doesn't matter. .
Yeah, but unlike some, I did see them in real time. Those who didn’t don’t qualify.Doesn't matter. If that's the case you'd shouldn't be able to rank players highly either if you didn't see them play in real time.
No, only if I want to discuss all-time greats, before and during my lifetime. Just like anyone else.Only if you want to provide a weak argument.
Yeah, but I did see them in real time. You didn’t, so you don’t qualify.
That’s totally fine, but dudes need to stop complaining about the hot take culture and rhetoric of current NBA talk when they’re actively contributing to it themselves.You must have forgot sports is purely for entertainment and gambling, it’s perfectly acceptable to shyt on peoples career the shyt isn’t impactful to society in anyway
You grown, and you can discuss whoever you want, it just won’t hold any weight over those who experienced the players.No, only if I want to discuss all-time greats, before and during my lifetime. Just like anyone else.
I don't care who you saw, especially since it's extremely unlikely you're 60 years old and saw prime Kareem or 3peat MVP Bird and was old enough to follow. I'm absolutely qualified.
Again, if this the logic, nobody can rank a player in any capacity of they didn't see them.
But a lot of us didAgain, if you never saw a player actually play, how can you rank them? On video tapes and hearsay? Nah, I’ll take the word of eyewitness over hearsay
You just found ways to minimize his rings. He did what he was supposed to do, win those 2 rings. Doesn’t matter the circumstances, he won. Look throughout history of the playoffs and finals, key situations played a part in teams winning. It’s called not making excuses for losing…or winning.
How can I fit the description if I don't have any posts in here calling anybody you named overrated?You grown, and you can discuss whoever you want, it just won’t hold any weight over those who experienced the players.
If you don’t care who I saw, why even respond to me? I didn’t address you, obviously you fit the description and felt a way.
I absolutely saw 3peat MVP Bird, and had a great understanding of the game too. I had a pair of Weapons, not his ugly black and white joints, but Magic’s purple and gold, AND Zeke’s blue and white. I saw the all time greats play MULTIPLE times at the Garden. From Zeke’s first game at the Garden, to KD’s last game at the Barclays.
Again, if you never saw a player actually play, how can you rank them? On video tapes and hearsay? Nah, I’ll take the word of eyewitness over hearsay.
You’re probably reffing yo someone else. I didn’t minimize any rings in my posts.No, I only pointed that out because you tried to minimize the rings of players who played for so-called superteams....and even then I still gave Hakeem his props by saying he was better than KD.
I’ve seen enough of Kareem in real time to make my feelings known. I’m not going back and forth breh. Feel how you feel.How can I fit the description if I don't have any posts in here calling anybody you named overrated?
I responded to you because I find the statement silly regardless of who said it or if I fit the description. I don't care who you saw because it doesn't give your opinion anymore weight than mine, same as my opinion not having any weight with you.
Look how you skip over Prime Kareem when you named him as somebody people shouldn't speak on. So you're being a hypocrite.
Again, if this the logic, nobody can rank a player in any capacity if they didn't see them. You can't rank anyone before the 80s.
You haven't seen enough of him, especially the version of him that built his reputation, to "disqualify" anyone from speaking on him.I’ve seen enough of Kareem in real time to make my feelings known. I’m not going back and forth breh. Feel how you feel.