respectable. I have no argument other than aesthetics and brand loyalty.
respectable. I have no argument other than aesthetics and brand loyalty.
Skylar was a rookie last year bruh, a bad one at that. shyt takes time and as you can clearly see she is starting to make an impression on the game
UA needs to step away from basketball. No one will ever take down Nike or Addidas
bron four and Jordan I's in foam were better than the penny foams.
even the Barkley foams kill the penny foams.
maybe you have to much nostalgia/brand loyalty for the penny foams...
art barr
serious question - what rock do you live under?
ny is not known for football.
so, that is completely understandable.
personally, basketball shoe wise.
as far, as company's tha don't have a retro.
us actually makes a function and cosmetically pleasing basketball shoe line.
if I was to rock a pair.
it would be for hooping in.
yet, that curry pe has the same styling as the nike hyperposite.
so, I don't know why people hate on ua's in this thread from a fashion perspective.
when, hyperposite's were a sought after hypebeast casual wear j.
not much difference between these and those curry's at all.
plus, us has their material game down.
where they not making bobo's and actually have a grasp in what is popping cosmetically incomparison to nike.
art barr
Kevin Durant's representation, Roc Nation Sports, informed Nike on Wednesday that he has a deal on the table with Under Armour worth between $265 million and $285 million over 10 years, sources told ESPN.com.
The deal includes Under Armour stock and other incentives such a community center built in his mother's name whose exact worth will not be known for some time.
Nike, which saw its signature business related to the Oklahoma City Thunder forward grow to roughly $175 million at retail this past season, will now have the right to match, which is a condition of Durant's current contract with the brand. Durant can still choose Nike if they don't match, but can't legally choose Under Armour if they do.