i could make some flake joke but just fukk him too
Kavanaugh SCOTUS Thread! Senate Confirms by 50-48 Vote Margin; Kavanaugh Sworn-In
- Thread starter Paper Boi
- Start date
You mean to tell me this fekkit Clarence would vote against issues that affect his race?!
Honestly, this should be common fukkin sense. fukk that Heitkamp bytch and any dumb ass Dem that agrees with her
clarence is uncle ruckus. he feels he's a white man suffering from revitiligo.You mean to tell me this fekkit Clarence would vote against issues that affect his race?!
He had that @DEAD7 view that hardship will get people off of their ass.
Huellz Santana
Shocking
throw out a minority woman candidate after taking an L with a cac woman candidate democrat brehs
Obama was right of hillary, but he was young, charismatic, affable, articulate, scandal free, and came on the back of Bush.
He also lost those southern states he won in 08 in 2012
Huellz Santana
Shocking
see this the shyt I'm talmbout. black people did their part. WE are the not the reason Trump won. we knew what was at stake.
Pull Up the Roots
Veteran
This is one of the women supposedly being considered. Amy Coney Barrett:
Some Worry About Judicial Nominee’s Ties to a Religious Group
"... her membership in a small, tightly knit Christian group called People of Praise never came up at the hearing, and might have led to even more intense questioning.
Some of the group’s practices would surprise many faithful Catholics. Members of the group swear a lifelong oath of loyalty, called a covenant, to one another, and are assigned and are accountable to a personal adviser, called a “head” for men and a “handmaid” for women. The group teaches that husbands are the heads of their wives and should take authority over the family.
Current and former members say that the heads and handmaids give direction on important decisions, including whom to date or marry, where to live, whether to take a job or buy a home, and how to raise children.
Legal scholars said that such loyalty oaths could raise legitimate questions about a judicial nominee’s independence and impartiality. The scholars said in interviews that while there certainly was no religious test for office, it would have been relevant for the senators to examine what it means for a judicial nominee to make an oath to a group that could wield significant authority over its members’ lives.
“These groups can become so absorbing that it’s difficult for a person to retain individual judgment,” said Sarah Barringer Gordon, a professor of constitutional law and history at the University of Pennsylvania. “I don’t think it’s discriminatory or hostile to religion to want to learn more” about her relationship with the group ... "
People of Praise - Wikipedia
88m3
Fast Money & Foreign Objects
The New York Times Opinion Section
8 hrs ·
Why shouldn't President Trump get to appoint a new Supreme Court justice? Because people under the cloud of investigation do not get to pick the judges who may preside over their cases.
NYTIMES.COM
Opinion | A Better Reason to Delay Kennedy’s Replacement
Presidents under the cloud of investigation should not get to pick the judges who may preside over their cases.
88m3
Fast Money & Foreign Objects
The New York Times Opinion Section
5 hrs ·
Donald J. Trump prepares to nominate a Supreme Court justice...
