Won’t matter.Will She be in by Roe V Wade time?
Won’t matter.Will She be in by Roe V Wade time?
Why do you think Manchin (or Sinema) will tank the nominee?So when Manchin tanks the whole thing with a thumbs down then what? That will just embarrass the nominee and the President.
Like No1 said, none of this is relevant to the court's decisions.Will She be in by Roe V Wade time?
That ugly c00n Faulkner said nothing. SMHTomi Lahren Ridicules Idea of Black Woman Joining SCOTUS (mediaite.com)
She said this shyt to Harris Faulkner, a black woman.
Remember when Coli c00ns used to say they wanted to smash Tomi Lahren?
That’s not going to prevent the 10 from selecting along ideology. And where does packing the court end? I’m just curious and not trying to flame anyone by asking that.that's great.
doesn't solve the politization problem long-term. we need to expand the courts.
5 Justices for each party and the 10 choose 3 more.
It does.That’s not going to prevent the 10 from selecting along ideology. And where does packing the court end? I’m just curious and not trying to flame anyone by asking that.
Bro, every judge is ideological. And more importantly, there are not an equal number of liberal and conservative people in America. Giving equal say to a group of people that have lost every popular for damn near 30 years is ridiculous. We have a right wing court because of Senate fukk shyt. Now you want to give these people more outsized power? Bro what type of fantasy land are you living in? You actually think that last pick won’t be highly political and that getting appointed won’t be contingent on guaranteeing that you will vote for a highly partisan person? We almost certainly never fill those final 3 spots. At best we would be stuck 6-6.It does.
If the law/amendment/rule whatever is...
Each Party gets 5 judges, and those 10 judges have to agree on the last 3. That's totally fair. It can't be ideological because that'd just end up in the seats not being filled...