I both love and loathe threads like this. The man was unquestionably African, in appearance, parentage and origin. However, most people here want to know whether he was
black, which makes no sense given that
- The Ancient Romans had no modern concept of race familiar to the modern day layperson. Did they notice phenotypic features and differences? Of course, but the Romans were more likely to classify someone due to national origin other than ethnic/racial origin.
- This very website cannot come to a concrete definition of what black means, given that Severus was of Berber and Phoenician origin, this becomes doubly tricky since I have seen opinions on This site stating that Berbers and Semites are not black
- Being black is as much of a social and political question as much as one of mere phenotype, similarly people are posting pictures looking to infer genotype info from phenotype, a major no no to anyone remotely familiar with Anthropology
The man was a person of color to borrow a popular designation. Even if we cannot nail down Severus as being black or black in the way The Coli means, he wss still a man of color, a man of Africa who rose to prominence as head of one of history's greatest Empires. Just as there have been many undeniably black people whose names have been lost to history has done the same. Why must we emulate the eurocentric nutters who claim every prominent civilization is White? We have a proud history; Africa has many great empires and thrown up many heroes in World history, plus, we of all people can claim a direct kinship tie to the first modern humans to roam and civilize the planet. We don't need to claim the history of others in order to exalt or acknowledge our own.