Just Finish Marathoning the Harry Potter Movies.

MidniteJay

無敵
Supporter
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
24,666
Reputation
5,849
Daps
65,743
took years but i finally did it :heh:

My Thoughts....
  • Harry got to be the most sorry ass hero i've seen in to date. spend a decade in a school that teaches you how to use magic and only know 3 spells brehs :snoop:
  • And worst of all, this weak nikka ass nikka cuffed Ron Weasly's dusty ass lil sister. He should of gone get Hermoine, that wierd blonde chick, or even that asian chick:mjlit:, anything but her.
  • Draco was even more sorry than Harry, I thought he was going to have a naruto vs sasuke type rivarly but all this guy was whiny cowardly wannabe lil bully. Didn't do anything gangsta, he was just a nuisance. :scust:
  • Ron was and is a worthless bum, him getting them hermoine cheeks was obviously a charity gift.:mjlol:
  • Voldermort was a decent villain, could of done more:yeshrug:

Dap and Rep because that was one of the most irritating things that stood out to me while reading the books as a kid and I ended up not liking dude after finishing. :martin: I'd go so far to say that even though he died it was really Dumbledore that defeated Voldemort. His private meetings with Dumbledore, wasted. Spend all that time on some blast from the past shyt when he could have been learning how to fight. :hhh:

Agreed with Ronald Weasely. If you gonna make you main protagonist trash at least make his right hand mane a non lame and competent dude. Ron should have been bout that action like his twin brothers. Stayed catching Ls and only became a prefect because Dumbledore didn't want to destroy his friendship to Harry because of the shine he was getting. Guess what happened to the dude in the epilogue? Harry is his boss when he becomes head of the Aurors department. Harry also becomes Minister of Magic a position Hermione also gets. Where's Ron after that? Running his Twin brother's joke shop. :laff:

Draco is a waste. Could have had the perfect redemption arc to show that Slytherin's weren't all literally snake ass bytches. :snoop:

Voldemort could have been a GOAT villain but he's brought down by the fact that he got bodied by an unimpressive Harry.

Low key trash story telling.
 
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
65,764
Reputation
28,667
Daps
392,207
Reppin
Ft. Stewart, Ga
I know this goes without saying but the books really makeup for pretty much all the criticisms you have about the movies

-Harry is more “heroic” in the books and is portrayed as a more compassionate person. You get the feeling that even without the “boy who lived” title he’d still be a pretty popular and well liked student.

-Ron is WAYYYYYYYYYYY better in the books than the movies. He’s more competent, smart, and brave. Even though he takes L’s he still gets a few legit W’s in the books so that you don’t think of him as a wasted sidekick (plus he’s funny as hell)

-The Ron/Hermione relationship is better fleshed out in the books so that you get a sense of why Hermione would be attracted to him vs Harry. It builds organically from Book 3 onwards.

-What the films got RIGHT were Snape/Dumbledore/Voldemort/Hermione and pretty much all the background characters.
 

MartyMcFly

What's up doc, can we rock?
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
59,888
Reputation
9,212
Daps
161,047
Reppin
P.G. County
I know this goes without saying but the books really makeup for pretty much all the criticisms you have about the movies

-Harry is more “heroic” in the books and is portrayed as a more compassionate person. You get the feeling that even without the “boy who lived” title he’d still be a pretty popular and well liked student.

-Ron is WAYYYYYYYYYYY better in the books than the movies. He’s more competent, smart, and brave. Even though he takes L’s he still gets a few legit W’s in the books so that you don’t think of him as a wasted sidekick (plus he’s funny as hell)

-The Ron/Hermione relationship is better fleshed out in the books so that you get a sense of why Hermione would be attracted to him vs Harry. It builds organically from Book 3 onwards.

-What the films got RIGHT were Snape/Dumbledore/Voldemort/Hermione and pretty much all the background characters.

Yup. And Harry in the books is less angry than the movies but in the movies his anger makes sense. The books do get dark but not as dark as the movies so he can be more compassionate and “heroic” on the page. The movies really hit on that theme of Voldemort and Harry being similar if not for their upbringing and the people around them
 

Soymuscle Mike

Formerly known as Vincenzo Corleone
Supporter
Joined
Jun 6, 2012
Messages
11,590
Reputation
4,823
Daps
57,818
Reppin
Sweetlake City
The books also do a better job explaining why the other relationships didn't work and Ginny did.

Harry was basically bros before hoes and Ginny was enough of a ride or die chick to get that.
 

obarth

R.I.P Char
Poster of the Year
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
16,849
Reputation
9,176
Daps
83,838
Reppin
Pawgs with dragons
catching balls ran in Harry's bloodline
full
 

Kinguno

The Immortal
Joined
Jan 11, 2017
Messages
14,988
Reputation
1,284
Daps
32,549
Reppin
New York
Dumbledore fukked Harry up by not raising him and that whole thing of his Mom's family hating him because he was a horcrux was wack

Potter's dad side entire family died but they were an important magical family so Harry ain't got no Wizard cousins?

Tom Riddle JR wasn't even that bad

The revision of Snape probably the worse yes man almost got killed by the either the whomping williow or Rupin in werewolf mode but he was such a p*ssy and simp one girl you liked and never talked to had a whole life and you never even had a girlfriend.

Hagrid a waste of height

Harry Potter was basically a billionaire why would he grow up and get a job man could have brought a team, sold wands, sold robes, gamble, and smoke cigars until his turned yellow like a beef patty. You know like :mjlit:

Butterbeer is lit worth going to Orlando

Harry related to so much greats and never knowing his history :wow:

Love is powerful and Tom killed so "many" people so nobody really loved them like that they thought they were Harry
 

FlyRy

Superstar
Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
30,794
Reputation
3,205
Daps
62,406
Yup. And Harry in the books is less angry than the movies but in the movies his anger makes sense. The books do get dark but not as dark as the movies so he can be more compassionate and “heroic” on the page. The movies really hit on that theme of Voldemort and Harry being similar if not for their upbringing and the people around them
I remember Harry being pretty angry in the books, but I only ever read them once.
 
Top