Juice WRLD Lost Millions After Sting took 85% of Lucid Dreams

pawdalaw

Superstar
Joined
Jan 13, 2013
Messages
8,568
Reputation
2,199
Daps
28,057
Reppin
Fayetteville
There is a Steely Dan interview on YouTube where they basically ether them, saying: "these guys lifted ou r song and said Uptown Baby, Uptown baby. And had a hit record. Thank you Tariq and peter Guns" shyt was funny as hell.
 

mobbinfms

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 10, 2012
Messages
37,397
Reputation
15,445
Daps
93,870
Reppin
TPC
There needs to be a balance between protecting artists (in this case I’m referring to Sting) and not stifling the creativity of other artists (Juice Planet).

For decades now a large part of music has been sampling. Sometimes it’s very creative ( :havdahell: )in this instance it’s not.

In 96 the idea of Nas rapping over a Sting sample was pretty out there, but this song is not creative.

Still, they need to change the laws. Artists should be able to take what they want and the sampled artist should get a set percentage. For something like this, Sting should get half. For something where there are multiple samples at work, all the samples artists should split 50%.
 

FaTaL

Veteran
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
103,822
Reputation
5,150
Daps
207,257
Reppin
NULL
There needs to be a balance between protecting artists (in this case I’m referring to Sting) and not stifling the creativity of other artists (Juice Planet).

For decades now a large part of music has been sampling. Sometimes it’s very creative ( :havdahell: )in this instance it’s not.

In 96 the idea of Nas rapping over a Sting sample was pretty out there, but this song is not creative.

Still, they need to change the laws. Artists should be able to take what they want and the sampled artist should get a set percentage. For something like this, Sting should get half. For something where there are multiple samples at work, all the samples artists should split 50%.
Naw, some samples demand a higher percentage
 

spliz

SplizThaDon
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
62,596
Reputation
9,587
Daps
208,629
Reppin
NY all day..Da Stead & BK..
Let’s be real, he never thought it would blow up like it did

So he was

:manny:

There’s also a good chance he didn’t realize it had a sample in it
Which is why it wouldve been easy to clear that shyt. Lol. Cause Sting wouldnt have had a gauge on how popular the song wouldve gotten. This is how nikkas get fukked over. Once u dont clear a sample. The person u sampled can ask for ANYTHING they want. And if the song is successful. They high ball the fukk outta u.
 

Maude

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Mar 4, 2014
Messages
4,617
Reputation
3,220
Daps
19,715
Reppin
The Midwest
There needs to be a balance between protecting artists (in this case I’m referring to Sting) and not stifling the creativity of other artists (Juice Planet).

For decades now a large part of music has been sampling. Sometimes it’s very creative ( :havdahell: )in this instance it’s not.

In 96 the idea of Nas rapping over a Sting sample was pretty out there, but this song is not creative.

Still, they need to change the laws. Artists should be able to take what they want and the sampled artist should get a set percentage. For something like this, Sting should get half. For something where there are multiple samples at work, all the samples artists should split 50%.

Mobb these cats lazy, they need to learn how to hide these samples better if they gonna use them and not clear them.
Personally if you take something I created without my permission and profit off it, i'm coming for everything.
If producers come through the correct channels then artist sampled should get a flat rate paid for by the labels
 
Top