Appoint federal judges who are less likely to interpret the law this way.
She will do NOTHING...
same way she aint do nothing for mitrice richardson...
Kamala has given us NO REASON to believe she would do anything different. What evidence do you have to support that supposition
@Professor Emeritus?
They only care about themselves and how they're directly benefiting from it. They refuse to see the forest from the trees. Some of the gains and tangibles they want they won't actually get to enjoy but their descendants will benefit. But they want it for themselves and damn everything else if its not that way.
Bullshyt. The ones directly benefitting are the Democratic trojan horses. There is no money in pro-blackness.
I could argue that what we're seeing rn is a fight between in the
individualistic, Boule, pro-Kamala class and everybody else. There are a lot of black voters, like myself, who think that
communal pain is what gets us mad enough to demand change.
A good example of individual vs communal pain is the 14th amendment, where slavery is taken from a communal concern to an individual one. Interestingly, taking the individualistic approach, we have more bm in prison that were ever in slavery. The same Boule negro lawyers who fought these cases in the early 20th c no longer fight these cases like they're fighting for their lives...
bc they're not. I recently watched a video where t
he author of The New Jim Crow, Michelle Alexander, explained the prejudices
she brought to her job as an ACLU civil rights lawyer and had to overcome.
Them Boule nikkas is compromised.
www.markey.senate.gov
nypost.com
