They both used each other to further their own goals. The studio didn't need Hill they could have cast someone else in that role. Just because he got cast in it doesn't mean they gotta up his pay. If that's what they were willing to pay for it then it is what it is.Can yall nikkas please stop writing this over and over? We understand the logic behind his decision. It still doesn't absolve the studio from being greedy soulless muthafukkas. The studio heads may think Jonah Hill isn't a serious actor but, he's still relatively high profile to the movie going audience. People know who he is. $60,000 is disgusting. If they threw $300,000 to $400,000 at him, thats respectable, then you can say, "he took a paycut to better his career". $60,000 isn't a paycut. Its disrespectful as hell. Thats the salary you pay that nikka who starred in Napoleon Dynamite.
Denzel is fukking Denzel and that movie was a vehicle for him to star in. Terrance couldn't pull a move like that. He don't sell tickets on his name alone and in Iron Man 2 it was clear RDJ was the star. on top of that it's Iron Man and he was a secondary character in it.Nah, I'm with Terrance Howard. Howard didn't ask for a raise for Iron Man 2. They wanted him to take a paycut. how you gonna ask an actor who helped make a film a huge success to take a paycut for the sequel. Yeah, he could've swallowed his pride, but that was the right move. Hindsight it wrecked his career a bit, but somethings you gotta stand tall for.
They tried to get Denzel to take a 4 million dollar paycut from 20 mill to 16 million for that Tony Scott Train movie. Denzel's agent hit the studio with the the . You know what the studio did? They paid Denzel his 20 million.
This was the right move for Jonah. He proved himself and will never have to do this again.
whats wrong with Gravity?
They both used each other to further their own goals. The studio didn't need Hill they could have cast someone else in that role. Just because he got cast in it doesn't mean they gotta up his pay. If that's what they were willing to pay for it then it is what it is.
If you walk into Walmart and accept a minimum wage job knowing its minimum wage the fact that Walmart is a billion dollar corporation has jack shyt to do with what you get paid.
Can yall nikkas please stop writing this over and over? We understand the logic behind his decision. It still doesn't absolve the studio from being greedy soulless muthafukkas. The studio heads may think Jonah Hill isn't a serious actor but, he's still relatively high profile to the movie going audience. People know who he is. $60,000 is disgusting. If they threw $300,000 to $400,000 at him, thats respectable, then you can say, "he took a paycut to better his career". $60,000 isn't a paycut. Its disrespectful as hell. Thats the salary you pay that nikka who starred in Napoleon Dynamite.
Moneyball came out a little over a decade ago.
Moneyball: The Art of Winning an Unfair Game is a book by Michael Lewis, published in 2003, about the Oakland Athletics baseball team and itsgeneral managerBilly Beane. Its focus is the team's analytical, evidence-based, sabermetric approach to assembling a competitive baseball team, despite Oakland's disadvantaged revenue situation. A film based on the book starring Brad Pitt was released in 2011.