Jon Stewart stays bringing the heat on gun crime statistics.

[Cakebatter]

You would have to change the constitution to ban guns, which ain't never going to happen, so Jon Stewart is just blowing smoke. I also don't get his point of blaming Kansas City, Indianapolis, and Milwaukee for Chicago's gun crimes, when those other cities themselves have few gun crimes than Chicago. Anyone crying about guns and drugs, without discussing race is being intellectually dishonest or just spouting propaganda.

 

[Remote]

Training in order to carry not to own.
Hell not to gun registration. That is unconstitutional for the Fed to create a gun registry.

No it isn’t.

 

[Noriega]

Most people buying guns in Indiana are Indiana residents who grew up in Chicago. You can buy a gun in Hammond, Indiana legally and be back in Illinois within 2 minutes. Back in Chicago within a 10.

This is true

Pops grew up in the jects here in chi. Said dudes use to come thru the hood with Alabama , Arkansas , Mississippi plates. Lot of blacks in Chi have family connections down south

Duffel bags in they trunk full of handguns and ammo and sell em. Then hop right back on the highway

 

[Prodyson]

We have tons of laws on the books regarding firearms. Making more is fukking pointless and only provides impediments to non-criminal having firearms. People break these laws not because they are easy to break, but because they don't fear the consequences.

Lynching is an extra judicial murder. It is already illegal!!
Funny you cry about lynching and white supremacy but advocate for more gun laws. Which community was most impacted by these bigoted laws in the past?

Black folks and Liberals advocating more gun laws is insane. They won't disarm the people yall want disarmed.
What additional gun laws do you think will work and make potential criminals suddenly stop in their tracks??

Reading comprehension. I didn’t say anything about making lynching, specifically, illegal. So you clearly missed my point. There are several issues with your position.

1. You treat gun ownership like it’s a necessity for life. I don’t give a damn if it takes a little extra effort to buy a gun, especially if it’s not a basic handgun or shotgun for home protection. Most people don’t beed anything other than one or two pistols. I definitely don’t care if it takes even a year to get approved to get an “assault rifle” or the like. It’s not life or death

2. Yes, criminals do break laws because they are easy to break (amongst other reasons). It’s the same reason why most people speed, but they slow down when they see a cop.

3. It doesn’t matter how many laws there are for anything if they suck and/or can’t be enforced. It doesn’t mean we don’t need new laws. It means we need better ones. The idea that this is justification not to address this problem through legislation is idiocy. The problem is we’re afraid to step out of the box with solutions and keep rehashing the same laws that don’t fix anything. You want to see some things change, start targeting regulations toward manufacturers and military/weapons contractors or how about making the tracking of guns easier. You start putting some of that responsibility on gun manufacturers and contractors and I bet you they’ll figure out a way to curb access to criminals if its going to affect their bottom line… or existence

All that bullshyt you talking is a cop out. And my guess is probably because you have your own personal hard on for guns.

 

[Lexington Steele]

Criminals don't follow the fukking laws. No matter how many stupid fukking gun laws get passed that won't stop people from breaking the law.

Other countries that banned guns are not overrun with outlaws with guns though. They proved gun control worked. America is just full of small dikk energy men who want to be a tough guy by carrying.

 

[The Wolf Among You]

There should be a limit to how many and what kind of firearms the average citizen can purchase and own.
I don’t know how people can disagree with this.

 

[Everythingg]

Allow celebrities and politicians that walk around with armed security to tell you to give your guns away brehs

 

[Sir Richard Spirit]

I grew up in NYC and I was fukking SHOCKED the first time I went to my first gun show in the south. I took one of my brothers and he was like "how the fukk is all this shyt legal?!?" nikkas had kevlar, level 3 armor plates, armored plate carriers, swords, AKs, ARs, 100 round drums, tactical vests, tactical helmets, etc.

At the gun store right up the street from me they're selling a damn gatling gun

Being a gun owner is a way of life for millions of Americans. What is wild to us is completely normal to other people.

 

[saturn7]

No it isn’t.

I believe the SC has ruled national gun registry would be unconstitutional. I have to find the exact text.

There is federal law against it.

Firearms Owners’ Protection Act (FOPA), 1986 Under 18 U.S.C. §926, the Attorney General is authorized to prescribe the rules and regulations necessary to carry out the GCA. Section 6 of FOPA amended §926 to prohibit a registry of firearms, firearms owners, or firearms transactions. The pertinent language of §926 reads

"No such rule or regulation prescribed after the date of the enactment of the Firearms Owners' Protection Act may require that records required to be maintained under this chapter or any portion of the contents of such records, be recorded at or transferred to a facility owned, managed, or controlled by the United States or any State or any political subdivision thereof, nor that any system of registration of firearms, firearms owners, or firearms transactions or dispositions be established.

Nothing in this section expands or restricts the Secretary’s [Attorney General’s] authority to inquire into the disposition of any firearm in the course of a criminal investigation. "

Statutory Federal Gun Registry Prohibitions and ATF Record Retention Requirements
(P.L. 99-308, May 19, 1986, 100 Stat. 449, 459.)"

 

[Lexington Steele]

Allow celebrities and politicians that walk around with armed security to tell you to give your guns away brehs

Yes, every individual should have an armed security team. And each security team member needs their own security team, and so on. Their guns should also have their own guns, just in case, better safe than sorry.

 

[saturn7]

Black folks on the pro gun-control team are insane.

https://www.thecoli.com/threads/the-official-ados-discussion-thread.691792/post-48406258

 

[saturn7]

Reading comprehension. I didn’t say anything about making lynching, specifically, illegal. So you clearly missed my point. There are several issues with your position.

1. You treat gun ownership like it’s a necessity for life. I don’t give a damn if it takes a little extra effort to buy a gun, especially if it’s not a basic handgun or shotgun for home protection. Most people don’t beed anything other than one or two pistols. I definitely don’t care if it takes even a year to get approved to get an “assault rifle” or the like. It’s not life or death

2. Yes, criminals do break laws because they are easy to break (amongst other reasons). It’s the same reason why most people speed, but they slow down when they see a cop.

3. It doesn’t matter how many laws there are for anything if they suck and/or can’t be enforced. It doesn’t mean we don’t need new laws. It means we need better ones. The idea that this is justification not to address this problem through legislation is idiocy. The problem is we’re afraid to step out of the box with solutions and keep rehashing the same laws that don’t fix anything. You want to see some things change, start targeting regulations toward manufacturers and military/weapons contractors or how about making the tracking of guns easier. You start putting some of that responsibility on gun manufacturers and contractors and I bet you they’ll figure out a way to curb access to criminals if its going to affect their bottom line… or existence

All that bullshyt you talking is a cop out. And my guess is probably because you have your own personal hard on for guns.

Guns exist in this world and aren't going anywhere. Yes they are a necessity for life. You live in Wonder Land.
Individuals have a God given right to self-defense.

Who the fukk are you to tell people what they need or should have?? You sound like a dictator.

The laws can be enforced. The DA's/Prosecutors have to have the will to do so.
Guns already have serial numbers and tracked from manufacturer to seller. FFL's keep records and are often audited by the ATF. Typical Liberal bullshyt, blame the companies who are not doing anything illegal instead of the people WHO CHOOSE to break the law.

Again what new gun laws do you propose that would actually achieve what you want (that haven't already been struck down for being un-constitutional)?

 

[Everythingg]

Yes, every individual should have an armed security team. And each security team member needs their own security team, and so on. Their guns should also have their own guns, just in case, better safe than sorry.

Nice sidestep.

Imagine allowing someone that runs around with armed security everywhere telling people that can’t do that to give up their guns? Not gonna happen

 

[Lexington Steele]

Nice sidestep.

Imagine allowing someone that runs around with armed security everywhere telling people that can’t do that to give up their guns? Not gonna happen

I'm not sidestepping anything, I'm just calling you a big dummy.

 

[↓R↑LYB]

Certain states require a specific amount of firearm training before you can buy a handgun or conceal carry. The training must come from a licensed/certified company or trainer.

Really? Never heard of that. The laws in GA are way more lax. Out here you can open carry in the damn airport



Plus we passed constitutional carry last year. You no longer need a permit to carry concealed in the state.

And if it wasn't for the federal ban, I'm sure GA would allow the sale of automatic weapons, grenades, flash bangs, and all types of shyt