Joe Rogan says Black people CAN be racist

[xCivicx]

Lol
I’m talking in circles?

Bruh. I’ve already agreed and stated that white supremacy is racist and completely rooted in racism.

But what you fail to acknowledge and accept is that not all racism is rooted in white supremacy.

Any time that someone feels their race is superior than another is demonstrating racism. Doesn’t matter what race you are. That belief is racist.
Your actions you take afterwards is something else.

Systemic racism is a qualifier of racism. It denotes a system of racism in place but it doesn’t encompass. All of racism.

Once again, racism isnt a feeling it's an act

You can FEEL as gay as you want.

Its sucking dikk that MAKES you gay

Again, what are you not understanding?

 

[xCivicx]

Because apparently I’m speaking to simple minded ppl that are so limited in their views that they can’t seem to grasp larger concepts.

Stick to the sandbox little one.

Ok arrogant and self entitled white male

 

[Hacksaw Jim Thuggin]

anyone can be racist

what is wrong with yall?

do cats wake up looking for something to be upset about?

 

[Big Blue]

I'm gonna keep it a bean and yall gonna hate me for it but yes, blacks can be racist. As some mentioned before, racism is hatred of others simply because of their race.

Now, with that being said, blacks cannot be systemically racist. That is why white racism is always highlighted because they enact their racism on to others for their own well being.

Thank you. It's not that hard.

 

[tonyclifton]

Because the word racist has a equivalence of white superiority when the term is being used by American standards.

Blacks are superior yet we as a race do not denote whites as inferior.

Cool I’m for a discussion. Before we get into it know I agree with y’all.

I guess I didn’t know that word started with that terminology, but at the same time your community turned the n word into a positive, why is it different with the word racism.take power over it. fukk em

To another pint which I never ever talk about on here because a lot of the Coli doesn’t like Mexicans

I believe Mexicans and Indians( feather I guess) to be pure and superior as well.

No lie I do denote white people. They don’t look like us(I know you guys don’t agree with my Mexican shyt but I guess apply it to yourselves), they have odd genetic problems that don’t apply to colored people, even Asians .

They might be the aliens lol

 

[Brolic Scholar]

anyone can be racist

what is wrong with yall?

do cats wake up looking for something to be upset about?

I’ve never skydived before. Imagine me explaining what it’s like to someone that has experienced skydiving for years.







Should that person listen to a word I have to say about something I’ve never experienced?

That’s Joe Rogan and any other cac’s problem here. They have zero experience or knowledge of what they’re talking about. Jumping on a trampoline isn’t skydiving. Being called a name or roasted isn’t racism.

 

[Maschine_Man]

I’ve never skydived before. Imagine me explaining what it’s like to someone that has experienced skydiving for years.







Should that person listen to a word I have to say about something I’ve never experienced?

That’s Joe Rogan and any other cac’s problem here. They have zero experience or knowledge of what they’re talking about. Jumping on a trampoline isn’t skydiving. Being called a name or roasted isn’t racism.

how do you even know what skydiving is?
you can identify what skydiving is, and you can acknowledge that it exists, just because you haven't experienced something doesn't mean you can't identify what it is, or know the principles of it.

now, explaining how someone FELT going skydiving (or experiencing racism) is a different matter altogether. but knowing the definition of what it is, and what it is about doesn't require personal experience.



you guys are turning this around in to some emotional, personal feelings and personal experience type game. it isn't that at all.

No one would (or should) take away your personal experience, or even belittle them by any means, but telling someone they don't know what something is because they haven't personally experienced it is pretty lame.

I'm sure...as a self proclaimed scholar you've read plenty of books, maybe some journals, reports, professional papers. And I'm sure (as most scholars do) haven learned something in those reports that you've never actually experienced. Does that mean you didn't learn them? that you don't know any of those concepts?

 

[blaccbeard]

how do you even know what skydiving is?
you can identify what skydiving is, and you can acknowledge that it exists, just because you haven't experienced something doesn't mean you can't identify what it is, or know the principles of it.

now, explaining how someone FELT going skydiving (or experiencing racism) is a different matter altogether. but knowing the definition of what it is, and what it is about doesn't require personal experience.



you guys are turning this around in to some emotional, personal feelings and personal experience type game. it isn't that at all.

No one would (or should) take away your personal experience, or even belittle them by any means, but telling someone they don't know what something is because they haven't personally experienced it is pretty lame.

I'm sure...as a self proclaimed scholar you've read plenty of books, maybe some journals, reports, professional papers. And I'm sure (as most scholars do) haven learned something in those reports that you've never actually experienced. Does that mean you didn't learn them? that you don't know any of those concepts?

Why do you cacs love to talk in circles and try to be condescending at the same time?

 

[Maschine_Man]

Why do you cacs love to talk in circles and try to be condescending at the same time?

why is it that simple ppl have to resort to name calling when they can't understand basic concepts like logic and reasoning?

 

[blaccbeard]

why is it that simple ppl have to resort to name calling when they can't understand basic concepts like logic and reasoning?

You're right, no need for the name calling, i'll rephrase. Why do you WHITE FOLKS love to talk in circles and try to be condescending at the same time? Is that better?

 

[Maschine_Man]

You're right, no need for the name calling, i'll rephrase. Why do you WHITE FOLKS love to talk in circles and try to be condescending at the same time? Is that better?

if you've read through this whole thread I've broken down my position a few times, and ppl haven't been able to clearly understand. Making it necessary for me to break it down even more.

I didn't start out condescending, but when ppl aren't clearly understanding basic principles (like established proven sources ie. dictionary definitions) with no rebuttal of facts, proof or any simple reasoning then it may come off as condescending to others that do understand these concepts because it looks petty.

I've never gone in circles with any point I've made. I've tried to understand what ppl are saying, then gave my point.

others calling me out for going in circles because they fail to understand the basic rules of logic, in an example like
"All white supremacy is racist, but not all racism is white supremacy" clearly don't understand the logical basics of deductive reasoning which is why I also gave the chicken/bird reference for more clarification.


then ppl were saying that I can't understand or know a concept because I've never felt it or experienced it. again, another fallacy.


call it what you want.

 

[blaccbeard]

if you've read through this whole thread I've broken down my position a few times, and ppl haven't been able to clearly understand. Making it necessary for me to break it down even more.

I didn't start out condescending, but when ppl aren't clearly understanding basic principles (like established proven sources ie. dictionary definitions) with no rebuttal of facts, proof or any simple reasoning then it may come off as condescending to others that do understand these concepts because it looks petty.

I've never gone in circles with any point I've made. I've tried to understand what ppl are saying, then gave my point.

others calling me out for going in circles because they fail to understand the basic rules of logic, in an example like
"All white supremacy is racist, but not all racism is white supremacy" clearly don't understand the logical basics of deductive reasoning which is why I also gave the chicken/bird reference for more clarification.


then ppl were saying that I can't understand or know a concept because I've never felt it or experienced it. again, another fallacy.


call it what you want.

All i got from this wall of text is that you are indeed a cac, so i was right the first time. Now shut the fukk up cac and stop speaking on black issues.

 

[Maschine_Man]

All i got from this wall of text is that you are indeed a cac, so i was right the first time. Now shut the fukk up cac and stop speaking on black issues.

It's a shame you think being educated is a cac thing.

maybe if you would have pursued more education in your life you wouldn't be so overwhelmed by words...

 

[Brolic Scholar]

@Maschine_Man

Joe Rogan said black people can be racists. Getting my back to my skydiving analogy what racism could Joe Rogan have possibly experienced outside of name calling, which I argue isn’t racism at all but bigotry, but for the sake of this example I’ll move past that.

If Joe Rogan is comparing the racism that black people experience to the bullshyt name calling that he has experienced or has seen or heard others experience from black people, he’s comparing an ant bite to a shark attack.

That’s OUR problem with whites saying that we can be racists too. Ok, then what? Is it stopping whites from doing... ANYTHING? fukk no. So why are they looking for sympathy or even drawing the comparison? What’s the point?

 

[Maschine_Man]

@Maschine_Man

Joe Rogan said black people can be racists. Getting my back to my skydiving analogy what racism could Joe Rogan have possibly experienced outside of name calling, which I argue isn’t racism at all but bigotry, but for the sake of this example I’ll move past that.

If Joe Rogan is comparing the racism that black people experience to the bullshyt name calling that he has experienced or has seen or heard others experience from black people, he’s comparing an ant bite to a shark attack.

That’s OUR problem with whites saying that we can be racists too. Ok, then what? Is it stopping whites from doing... ANYTHING? fukk no. So why are they looking for sympathy or even drawing the comparison? What’s the point?

does racism only exist between whites and blacks?

can black ppl not be racist to the asian nail shop owner or the arab convenience store worker?

can that mentally ill kid that got tortured by black kids because he was white feel racism?



another fallacy you make is that you think all white ppl are some big monolith. you think those rich white ppl that have all the power and make all the money give a fukk about poor whites (or even middle class whites?)
they ain't trying to help them. they ain't trying to reach down to them.

you think when Hillary and the gang were talking about deplorable they were talking about black folk or POC?

naw,


my point is, don't make generalizations about all white ppl when its really only the top 1-2% that actually hold any power to do anything.

jimbob down the street ain't got any power to do anything to anyone.