Joe Rogan Reveals Kamala Harris Campaign Wanted Editorial Control Over His Podcast

Space Cowboy

Christ is King
Bushed
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
4,454
Reputation
927
Daps
15,102
Reppin
CowboysNation
Bro I don’t care about Howard Stern lol. I’m talking about people saying it’s Rogan or nothing. She should’ve hit up as many places as she possibly could… I get that but c’mon. Folks are saying podcasters got the juice now well why act like Rogan was the ONE POD THAT WAS GOING TO MAKE OR BREAK HER? Again I said she probably should’ve went there. There’s a big ass thread on here where people were cussing folks out who said Shannon ain’t got it like we think… well she went on there and got less views than Tyrese :mjlol: I know how popular dudes pod is, I’m saying we have a problem if a podcast is determining elections out here.. I mean the hurricane knocking down a lot of Trump country in the Western NC mountains and them being like Biden/Harris and fema did nothing definitely didn’t help her campaign. I’m guessing a lot of those folks weren’t listening to Joe Rogan since they didn’t have power or internet for days upon days. These folks had to listen to local radio. That’s all they had. You can make all the excuses as to why she lost, it’s whatever at this point. Not going on a podcast is not a good enough excuse.
no one said Rogan or nothing but she needed to do Rogan.
 

LV Koopa

Jester from Hell
Joined
Nov 18, 2014
Messages
8,781
Reputation
1,604
Daps
26,793
Reppin
NYC
You must not keep up with Joe Rogan, This was a relevant talking point maybe in the beginning of 2016. Once Bernie sanders got screwed, Joe basically campaigned against Hillary Clinton, but wasn't fully in camp for Trump. During 2020, when he got called out for saying the N word, comparing black people to monkeys, and spreading misinformation on vaccines, he started to only criticize democrats primarily, but still...he would atleast have on leftist commentators like Jon stewart, David Pakman, Kyle Kulinski, Rhonda Patrick, etc.

Now fast forward to today, and before him recently having on John Fetterman, he hadn't had a leftist commentator on since Bill Maher in September of 2023. Even prior to that, started sparingly having them on. Meanwhile having on everyone else from Tucker Carlson, to Musk, to Peter fukking Thiel, to Dr. Phil to Kid Rock, Patrick Bet David, Ben Shapiro, Matt Walsh and many more trump supporters *exclusively*.

Even positions he used to debate people like Candace Owens on, like climate change, he reversed and is in complete denial of today...

So your idea that Rogan is a Liberal...is incorrect today and for the past few years. This is common consensus.



Her favorability was significantly higher than Trumps in objective reality. Democratic turnout, was simply too low.



She rose in the polls by 3 points after the debate, while Trump was flip flopping about cats and dogs and abortion consensus.



As opposed to 20%(or more) tarrifs that we would end up paying for?



She literally demonstrated an economic plan during the debate, and a healthcare plan; whereas Trump only had """concepts of a plan""" there is no comparison in terms of who actually demonstrated more policy positions.



Trump cancelled more actual appearances and debates than Kamala...and went on podcasts that already leaned in his direction.




We have no evidence what so ever that Joe Rogan cost her the election more than say...Gaza fracturing the base and lower democratic turn out by 13 million vites.



Her policies, and progresive policies in general...are still more popular

Minimum wage increases? More popular

Pro union and labor? More popular

Progressive health care initiatives? More popular

Roe v Wade? More popular

And once again, Trump merely maintained his same support from 2020, in fact lost 3 million votes by comparison. Whereas democratic turnout was low. So considering the popularity of leftist policies, the popular vote had more to do with Trump maintaining his base, and Kamalas not turning out.

As stated before - Rogan is a liberal. Hillary is not a liberal, Bernie Sanders is. He has always been critical of Hillary. No surprise he did not vote for her.
That N word debacle died as fast as it started, no idea how this helps the point you're trying to illustrate. Rogan doesn't only interview politicians you know? He's had plenty of people with leftist views on his platform. Weinstein, Thiel, and Musk who you just named were leftists. These guys were NOT Trump supports. When the Democratic party shifted to taking in far-left views and identity politics, these guys got demonized for calling it out. Like many Americans on the left, they felt the party shifted beneath them. Their views never changed. And calling them Trump supporters actually proves it - Trump is a moderate. Been a Democrat his entire life. He switched parties because he thought he could (rightfully) win the Presidency under the Republican party. Considering the amount of prominent Democrats that also switched (Tulsi, RFK) the rhetoric of the Republican party looking like the old Democrat party seems to be coming true.

Changing a position doesn't mean your entire political ideology changes. Even using climate change as an example, plenty of people on the left are the loudest voices denigrating the climate change movement for the grift that it is. In fact, a Liberal would most likely be the person to spot the hypocrisy of the ESG programs.

The comment regarding her earning less than 2% of the vote was in regard to her popularity among Democrats. Comparing her favorability to Trump is irrelevant, especially as she just lost to him.

Kamala did indeed rise in the polls post-debate. For a week. When news of ABC's fact checking fiasco started making the rounds outside of traditional media, her campaign panicked. Their own internal numbers revealed she was in trouble as voters felt Trump was unfairly criticized.

Yes, we will pay for tariffs. We are paying for tariffs on good now. Under Trump and under Biden's admin who not only kept some but even expanded on a number of them. We can talk in depth about why a government would want to implement tariffs. We can talk about Europe's tariffs on American auto or China's companies stealing American IP after forcing them to partner with their companies to do business in Hong Kong. The tariff implementation is part of a larger strategy to address complaints from American companies about our government not fighting back on countries imposing tariffs on us. Add in the outsourcing of American jobs and you see why both administrations were invested in doing so.

Kamala Harris never demonstrated an economic plan. Saying you will give people housing credits is not a plan. Even funnier is that the Trump campaign originally stated it and her campaign adopted it. Trump can definitely be criticized for saying he had concept of a plan. However, he did outline many times his plan included reducing government spending by focusing on the corrupt agencies stealing taxpayer dollars. When Kamala was asked about her idea to tax unrealized gains and she tried to explain it, she lost many voters. It showed she had no clue about how investments work. She got grilled by Democrats even worse than the Republicans.

Trump campaigned for 90 days straight in multiple states, did the appearance with the NABJ, several podcasts, and still had time to answer media questions. What appearances did he commit to and then cancel? The guy was everywhere. His VP was everywhere. The criticism was that Kamala Harris was hiding from the media. Again, this was coming from her own party. No one believes Trump was avoiding anyone.

I never argued that her missing out on Joe Rogan's podcast cost her the election. I stated how it came across to the public. I'm sure it did not cost her the election because at that point she was under 30% to win the election on Polymarket and her odds were falling by the day. By the time the Rogan interview came around she was effectively dead in the water and no one except people in a bubble thought she had any chance. The Rogan interview was a hail mary to get her back in the race. So you're correct - arguing it cost her the election is silly. It was over at that point.

Her policies, and progresive policies in general...are still more popular

Minimum wage increases? More popular

Pro union and labor? More popular

Progressive health care initiatives? More popular

Roe v Wade? More popular

And once again, Trump merely maintained his same support from 2020, in fact lost 3 million votes by comparison. Whereas democratic turnout was low. So considering the popularity of leftist policies, the popular vote had more to do with Trump maintaining his base, and Kamalas not turning out.

This is pure cope. Minimum Wage wasn't even seriously a discussion point this election. Labor unions didn't endorse her so how can you credibly say it was a popular policy? What is "progressive health care"? Roe vs Wade isn't a policy. The ruling that stripped Roe vs Wade was a court case initiated by Democrats that resulted in the SC saying the Constitution does not guarantee reproductive rights to the Federal Government.

Trump did not "merely maintain his support" from 2020. He increased across all demographics of the electorate. The reason the Democrats are in a panic is because they lost everything. In California 9 counties flipped from blue to red. In NYC, the margin for Trump was less than his margin in Texas and Florida. He gained support in 4 of the boroughs, exception being Staten Island. The fastest growing demographic, Latinos, voted overwhelmingly for Trump. All of the border towns in Texas flipped red. California lost an EC vote and Texas and Florida gained some. Democrats lost the Senate, House, EC, popular vote, and most state legislatives.

Instead of screaming about things on The Coli that don't really matter, you should go outside of this bubble and really find out what's going. To even say something in the face of what's going on shows you really do not have a handle on what is currently occurring in this country. He's the first Republican president to have a mandate in almost 40 years. That says a lot about how majority of this country is feeling right now. Educate yourself.
 

Formerly Black Trash

Philosopher, Connoisseur, Future Legend
Joined
Aug 2, 2015
Messages
54,158
Reputation
-2,729
Daps
140,661
Reppin
Na
As stated before - Rogan is a liberal. Hillary is not a liberal, Bernie Sanders is. He has always been critical of Hillary. No surprise he did not vote for her.
That N word debacle died as fast as it started, no idea how this helps the point you're trying to illustrate. Rogan doesn't only interview politicians you know? He's had plenty of people with leftist views on his platform. Weinstein, Thiel, and Musk who you just named were leftists. These guys were NOT Trump supports. When the Democratic party shifted to taking in far-left views and identity politics, these guys got demonized for calling it out. Like many Americans on the left, they felt the party shifted beneath them. Their views never changed. And calling them Trump supporters actually proves it - Trump is a moderate. Been a Democrat his entire life. He switched parties because he thought he could (rightfully) win the Presidency under the Republican party. Considering the amount of prominent Democrats that also switched (Tulsi, RFK) the rhetoric of the Republican party looking like the old Democrat party seems to be coming true.

Changing a position doesn't mean your entire political ideology changes. Even using climate change as an example, plenty of people on the left are the loudest voices denigrating the climate change movement for the grift that it is. In fact, a Liberal would most likely be the person to spot the hypocrisy of the ESG programs.

The comment regarding her earning less than 2% of the vote was in regard to her popularity among Democrats. Comparing her favorability to Trump is irrelevant, especially as she just lost to him.

Kamala did indeed rise in the polls post-debate. For a week. When news of ABC's fact checking fiasco started making the rounds outside of traditional media, her campaign panicked. Their own internal numbers revealed she was in trouble as voters felt Trump was unfairly criticized.

Yes, we will pay for tariffs. We are paying for tariffs on good now. Under Trump and under Biden's admin who not only kept some but even expanded on a number of them. We can talk in depth about why a government would want to implement tariffs. We can talk about Europe's tariffs on American auto or China's companies stealing American IP after forcing them to partner with their companies to do business in Hong Kong. The tariff implementation is part of a larger strategy to address complaints from American companies about our government not fighting back on countries imposing tariffs on us. Add in the outsourcing of American jobs and you see why both administrations were invested in doing so.

Kamala Harris never demonstrated an economic plan. Saying you will give people housing credits is not a plan. Even funnier is that the Trump campaign originally stated it and her campaign adopted it. Trump can definitely be criticized for saying he had concept of a plan. However, he did outline many times his plan included reducing government spending by focusing on the corrupt agencies stealing taxpayer dollars. When Kamala was asked about her idea to tax unrealized gains and she tried to explain it, she lost many voters. It showed she had no clue about how investments work. She got grilled by Democrats even worse than the Republicans.

Trump campaigned for 90 days straight in multiple states, did the appearance with the NABJ, several podcasts, and still had time to answer media questions. What appearances did he commit to and then cancel? The guy was everywhere. His VP was everywhere. The criticism was that Kamala Harris was hiding from the media. Again, this was coming from her own party. No one believes Trump was avoiding anyone.

I never argued that her missing out on Joe Rogan's podcast cost her the election. I stated how it came across to the public. I'm sure it did not cost her the election because at that point she was under 30% to win the election on Polymarket and her odds were falling by the day. By the time the Rogan interview came around she was effectively dead in the water and no one except people in a bubble thought she had any chance. The Rogan interview was a hail mary to get her back in the race. So you're correct - arguing it cost her the election is silly. It was over at that point.



This is pure cope. Minimum Wage wasn't even seriously a discussion point this election. Labor unions didn't endorse her so how can you credibly say it was a popular policy? What is "progressive health care"? Roe vs Wade isn't a policy. The ruling that stripped Roe vs Wade was a court case initiated by Democrats that resulted in the SC saying the Constitution does not guarantee reproductive rights to the Federal Government.

Trump did not "merely maintain his support" from 2020. He increased across all demographics of the electorate. The reason the Democrats are in a panic is because they lost everything. In California 9 counties flipped from blue to red. In NYC, the margin for Trump was less than his margin in Texas and Florida. He gained support in 4 of the boroughs, exception being Staten Island. The fastest growing demographic, Latinos, voted overwhelmingly for Trump. All of the border towns in Texas flipped red. California lost an EC vote and Texas and Florida gained some. Democrats lost the Senate, House, EC, popular vote, and most state legislatives.

Instead of screaming about things on The Coli that don't really matter, you should go outside of this bubble and really find out what's going. To even say something in the face of what's going on shows you really do not have a handle on what is currently occurring in this country. He's the first Republican president to have a mandate in almost 40 years. That says a lot about how majority of this country is feeling right now. Educate yourself.
Rogan is not a liberal in 2024.

If you think he is, you don't not understand white ppl
 

AngryBaby

All Star
Joined
Oct 13, 2014
Messages
4,371
Reputation
205
Daps
12,062
As stated before - Rogan is a liberal. Hillary is not a liberal, Bernie Sanders is. He has always been critical of Hillary. No surprise he did not vote for her.

First off bernie is a social democratic leftist to be specific, whereas democrats are generally called liberals. Joe abandoned liberalism around the time of the Spotify deal and Texas. Again, this is common consensus.


That N word debacle died as fast as it started, no idea how this helps the point you're trying to illustrate.

Lol What? I was outlining that around that time, Joe Rogan changed course lol and that, along with the vaccine backlash, was major catalyst. My god man. Reading comprehension.

Rogan doesn't only interview politicians you know? He's had plenty of people with leftist views on his platform. Weinstein, Thiel, and Musk who you just named were leftists.

Dude, do you not understand that what I stated was, that Joe Rogan was not having on *anyone* who opposed Trump in the last year and 2 months? Thiel, Musk, weinstein etc, actively support Trump. Thus abandoning their "leftist" label. You don't support the most far right policies and president, and then still claim to be on "the left".

Again, astoundingly, Joe Rogan did not have any anti-trump voice on the podcast for over a fukking year. He NEVER did that before. Kyle Kulinski, David Pakman, Destiny, Mehdi Hasan, Roland Martin ASKED to go on in the recent year. Nothing. He doesn't even bring Rhonda Patrick on anymore. He has cultivated a complete echo chamber.

He also compared Tim Walz to Kim Jung Un. So what a surprise that they weren't keen on going on.
 

AngryBaby

All Star
Joined
Oct 13, 2014
Messages
4,371
Reputation
205
Daps
12,062
These guys were NOT Trump supports. When the Democratic party shifted to taking in far-left views and identity politics, these guys got demonized for calling it out. Like many Americans on the left, they felt the party shifted beneath them. Their views never changed.

Wow, you really are using every right wing Rogan Bro talking point eh? First of all, if you suddenly shift your positions to being anti-minimum wage increases, anti-climate change initiatives, anti-pro choice, anti increased taxation on the wealthy, then you do NOT hold the same positions.



And calling them Trump supporters actually proves it - Trump is a moderate. Been a Democrat his entire life. He switched parties because he thought he could (rightfully) win the Presidency under the Republican party. Considering the amount of prominent Democrats that also switched (Tulsi, RFK) the rhetoric of the Republican party looking like the old Democrat party seems to be coming true.

Lmao this guy...can't be serious. Again, what is left leaning about Trump and his policies?

He believes climate change is a hoax

Isn't pro-choice

Doesn't believe in higher taxes on the rich.

Doesn't support higher minimum wage

Wants to repeal obamacare

Abd his only major legislation last term was a tax cut for corporations and Billionaires...

Which part is left leaning? Republicans can't even maintain the same support from previous Republicans.
 

AngryBaby

All Star
Joined
Oct 13, 2014
Messages
4,371
Reputation
205
Daps
12,062
Changing a position doesn't mean your entire political ideology changes. Even using climate change as an example, plenty of people on the left are the loudest voices denigrating the climate change movement for the grift that it is. In fact, a Liberal would most likely be the person to spot the hypocrisy of the ESG programs.

Lmao yo who's man's is this? Why is Climate change a grift, when big oil has a larger influence on big money? Wouldn't Exxon stand to gain more by not acknowledging climate is affected by emissions?

The comment regarding her earning less than 2% of the vote was in regard to her popularity among Democrats. Comparing her favorability to Trump is irrelevant, especially as she just lost to him.

Kamala did indeed rise in the polls post-debate. For a week. When news of ABC's fact checking fiasco started making the rounds outside of traditional media, her campaign panicked. Their own internal numbers revealed she was in trouble as voters felt Trump was unfairly criticized.

Correction, Trump supporters felt he was "unfairly crticized" stop making it seem as though it was the average voter. It wasn't.

Yes, we will pay for tariffs. We are paying for tariffs on good now. Under Trump and under Biden's admin who not only kept some but even expanded on a number of them. We can talk in depth about why a government would want to implement tariffs. We can talk about Europe's tariffs on American auto or China's companies stealing American IP after forcing them to partner with their companies to do business in Hong Kong. The tariff implementation is part of a larger strategy to address complaints from American companies about our government not fighting back on countries imposing tariffs on us. Add in the outsourcing of American jobs and you see why both administrations were invested in doing so.



Kamala Harris never demonstrated an economic plan. Saying you will give people housing credits is not a plan. Even funnier is that the Trump campaign originally stated it and her campaign adopted it. Trump can definitely be criticized for saying he had concept of a plan. However, he did outline many times his plan included reducing government spending by focusing on the corrupt agencies stealing taxpayer dollars. When Kamala was asked about her idea to tax unrealized gains and she tried to explain it, she lost many voters. It showed she had no clue about how investments work. She got grilled by Democrats even worse than the Republicans.

Trump campaigned for 90 days straight in multiple states, did the appearance with the NABJ, several podcasts, and still had time to answer media questions. What appearances did he commit to and then cancel? The guy was everywhere. His VP was everywhere. The criticism was that Kamala Harris was hiding from the media. Again, this was coming from her own party. No one believes Trump was avoiding anyone.

He cancelled 60 minutes, one for CNN and the second debate with kamala. Because he got his ass wooped.

I never argued that her missing out on Joe Rogan's podcast cost her the election. I stated how it came across to the public. I'm sure it did not cost her the election because at that point she was under 30% to win the election on Polymarket and her odds were falling by the day. By the time the Rogan interview came around she was effectively dead in the water and no one except people in a bubble thought she had any chance. The Rogan interview was a hail mary to get her back in the race. So you're correct - arguing it cost her the election is silly. It was over at that point.



This is pure cope. Minimum Wage wasn't even seriously a discussion point this election. Labor unions didn't endorse her so how can you credibly say it was a popular policy?

Real wage increases are happening already, and were the focal point of how you combat the price gouging. As just doing a "price cap" isn't going to happen under either administration. Economists look at inflation as how the price of a good relates to the percentage of your income. So, raising wages, I.E. minimum wage, has always been a democratic focal point. And maintaing the increase of real wages (that is happening under this admin btw) was the primary goal of Harris economic philosophy. Whereas Trump simply wants to add more tarrifs, in which the corporations won't pay for. We will. Further raising the cost of goods.

What is "progressive health care"? Roe vs Wade isn't a policy. The ruling that stripped Roe vs Wade was a court case initiated by Democrats that resulted in the SC saying the Constitution does not guarantee reproductive rights to the Federal Government.

Obama care and any expansions to it, Trump wants to repeal.

The rest I already explained are fundamental principles and legislations that are generally more popular amongst the general populace. None of which are republican ideals.

Again in regards to unions, it doesn't matter if they didnt "endorse". Thats for a variety of of reasons.

Through a series of executive orders signed in 2018, Trump decimated the power of federal unions, weakening their ability to bargain contracts and curtailing the amount of time union representatives can spend helping members with their complaints.

He is very anti-labor.


Instead of screaming about things on The Coli that don't really matter, you should go outside of this bubble and really find out what's going. To even say something in the face of what's going on shows you really do not have a handle on what is currently occurring in this country. He's the first Republican president to have a mandate in almost 40 years. That says a lot about how majority of this country is feeling right now. Educate yourself.
What's occurring in this country is a rise of populism fueled by misinformation aimed at people who don't understand how economics work. And literally think Trump is the reason the economy was good his first few years.

Trump's only major legislation was a tax cut for billionaires and corporations, putting us into a 7.8 trillion dollar deficit; that cut alone outspent CHIPS, American Rescue Plan, inflation reduction act, and student loan forgiveness combined. Now notice which pieces of legislation actually impact the people.

Also during Trump's previous term, average wages fell by $1000 by 2019.[/Quote]
 

CHICAGO

Vol. 9: Trapped
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
56,206
Reputation
12,116
Daps
377,082
Reppin
CHICAGO
She’s the Vice President of the United States. He’s a hack comedian, pretend fighter, and a podcast host who says the n-word and calls black people monkeys.

The fact she even entertained him was more than he deserves. The fact he thought she WOULDN’T ask for editorial privilege shows why he was too stupid to interview her anyway.

:mjlol:IF THE FORMER PRESIDENT/PRESIDENT ELECT
CAN DO THE SHOW UNEDITED
THE VP CAN DO THE SHOW UNEDITED

:devil:
:evil:

 
Top