People's lives are on the line every fukking day. Read the response and note the context. It wasn't about policy, it was about a VP pick to appeal to the left. My response was to say, the left who are vocal on twitter but who don't translate it into a vote?
Let go of the red mist and read. Nina Turner could be VP. It doesn't stop Biden from pushing draconian policies if he wanted to.
I read the context. Champion was saying Rice doesn't excite him because of her moderate political leanings. You responded saying a leftist would have no use besides exciting twitter leftists who don't vote. My point is that the ideology itself is the biggest factor/value. Biden could probably run the board if he chose Jeff Flake or Mitt Romney as his running mate, but what are you expecting a White House with that ideological makeup to actually...you know...do? That seems to be what's missing from a lot of these VP discussions...the actual performance of the job. People don't seem to be looking beyond the election, as if the point of a Presidential Administration is to simply be elected as opposed to actually governing. Biden will be captain of the ship regardless of who he picks as his VP, but personnel is policy. Having voices in the room is critical.
The pro-Rice contingent keeps boosting her FP credentials, I'd like to know what actual FP policies they're hoping she would push Biden on. What policies are the pro-Kamala contingent hoping she will guide Biden towards? What actual policies and actions do you hope a Biden-X White House will enact? A lot of people just want to go back to sleep like they were during the Obama years, trusting the nice-looking man/woman to handle things. That's not how government is supposed to work, and it's a recipe to get another Trump in 4 years.