Bloomberg - Are you a robot?
www.bloomberg.com
Every economist isn't going to have the same reaction to data and statistics provided and it's disingenuous to sit here and say otherwise. It's why bringing politics into the discussion is corny as shyt as these of discussions happen on a daily basis in the real world outside of The Coli.
I never said the vast majority of them did. You asked for receipts from economists and I gave them to you. Once again, different people are going to have different interpretations of data and statistics that are provided to them and may even ask what's all behind them.The vast majority have no issues with the number. I'm not going with a fringe narrative of the Fed juking the stats. You need more people.
Is the rate calculated in the same manner that is has been under previous administrations?I never said the vast majority of them did. You asked for receipts from economists and I gave them to you. Once again, different people are going to have different interpretations of data and statistics that are provided to them and may even ask what's all behind them.
I know that because I do the shyt on a daily basis for a living and have to explain it, so other posters on this site asking that simple question isn't MAGA at all.
It's more to data and statistics than raw calculations as there are different factors and circumstances that tell the story behind the numbers.Is the rate calculated in the same manner that is has been under previous administrations?
Oh ok. So nothing to really brag about then. Got it.
Yep. Once you run out of unemployment benefits, you are no longer counted as unemployed. The unemployment rate stat is completely worthless. Go look up a chart of the Workfoce Participation Rate. Its lower than anytime since the early 70s. I bet the true unemployment rate is around 25%.
I would imagine most people with common sense dont pay too much attention to these numbers.
no matter whose in office they inflate/deflate the stats to look good
NahWould lowering interest rates remedy the problem?
Disingenuous questions meant to discredit the numbers is magaSimply stating the metrics being measured when we had people in here who were discussing incorrect things that go into them, is maga now
So, if they permanently unemployed, how do they live in major cities? Welfare?