Jesus may have been from Nigeria....

[LionofJudah]

Actually, it does lol.

but you're so much of a "Hebrew-Israelite" stan that you're not gonna let up off your false belief.

You're completely delusional.

Cool, that's probably why you should stop following me around after five months and just do you.

 

[jalamanta]

1 star

 

[MostReal]

Czar you still haven't answered the question. What line does the 'Negroes' supposedly come from since its not HAM?

IMO all the brothers were black but that's another discussion.

 

[LionofJudah]

Czar you still haven't answered the question. What line does the 'Negroes' supposedly come from since its not HAM?

IMO all the brothers were black but that's another discussion.

His obsession with trying to disprove me backed his ass into a corner. LOL Trying to mix Hamitic Hypothesis in with the Zondervan definition of Ham knowing damn well they aren't talking about that.

 

[Czar]

Czar you still haven't answered the question. What line does the 'Negroes' supposedly come from since its not HAM?

IMO all the brothers were black but that's another discussion.

Ham bruh. I made that very clear in here.

Reading comprehension seems to fail you again.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negro





Negros=Hamites. Until Eurocentric writers decided they wanted to change the meaning to claim the accomplishments of the Hamites (i.e Egyptians) and wala.

But don't take my word for it...

http://www.cui-zy.cn/Recommended/Nature&glabolization/HamticAfrica.pdf

Well it sure as hell isn't Shem. Read the entry for him in that Dictionary if you don't believe me. It doesn't say "Shem is the father of the Negros".

And in order for you to understand why it says "Ham is the progenitor of the dark races; not the Negroes, but the Egyptians, Ethiopians, Libyans and Canaanites" in the Zondervan Dictionary.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamitic#Hamitic_hypothesis

In the mid-19th century, the term Hamitic acquired a new meaning as a few European writers claimed to identify a distinct "Hamitic race" that was superior to "Negroid" populations of Sub-Saharan Africa. The theory arose from early anthropological writers, who linked the stories in the Bible of Ham's sons to actual ancient migrations of a supposed Middle-Eastern sub-group of the Caucasian race.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caucasian_race#Physical_anthropology

Skin color amongst Caucasoids ranges greatly from pale, reddish-white, olive, through to dark brown tones.

^Refer to this


The Spanairds and Portuguese made it very clear who they thought "the negros" were.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negro

Around 1442 the Portuguese first arrived in sub-Saharan Africa while trying to find a sea route to India. The term negro, literally meaning "black", was used by the Spanish and Portuguese as a simple description to refer to people. From the 18th century to the late 1960s, "negro" (later capitalized) was considered to be the proper English-languageterm for certain people of sub-Saharan African origin.

 

[Czar]

@iLLaV3 What I wanna know is....

nothing more than variations of black folks skin breh...thanks anyway

anybody who got skin like that got some 'black' in them...so yes I believe that. I already told you...all those folks...including YOU are black in my eyes

According to him

Ole girl and boy are mega black, lol.

except those people don't have dark skin...fail again

care to explain this?

I don't see any woolly hair breh the bible denoted color of skin & hair texture as descriptions...so that's what I go by

Why do you contradict yourself so much?

 

[MostReal]

@iLLaV3 What I wanna know is....




Why do you contradict yourself so much?

I haven't contradicted myself at all. The bible described the characters they were specifically talking about as such. It doesn't mean that the rest of Israel didn't look like different shades of black folks

 

[Blackking]

Question... do you consider these people to be black?

Cause according to @iLLaV3 they're not, since they don't have "woolly hair"

First off, We are the most diverse people on the planet. my sons don't have wooly hair.. their mom's don't..(1 from cuba, 1 is a mixed irish jamican, and 1 is an ethicity that i won't mention cuz i dissed it too much on here) - they are all black.

That lil girl in that pic is less white washed than I am... her roots are less removed from African than most african americans. She comes from some of the first people out of Africa. So to me she is black - plus she's darker than half of AA.

2) you find all sorts of traits in Africa. take away skin color you find many 'asian' looking people native to Africa.

3) The obvious is usually the case. When we set up all these rules then we start to make up classifications for original people that are not needed.
Around 6 or 7 thousand years ago human's started to develop the ability to have light and white skin.... this is just a reaction that will go away relatively soon - In the mean time we don't need to divide up all the brown people on Earth, they are mostly black. Some Eurasians are white.

We have different cultures, but u can't post pics of people darker than half of african americans and expect people to not call them black.

and yea - wooly hair gives you even more of a clue that someone has african roots.

 

[UpAndComing]

if it could be proven, which it can't, that would be the end of christianity

white and even many black ppl would instantly stop believing in christianity.


nigerians are said to be hustlers and conmen there is some truth to this...

Watch the news like a sheep instead of learning about a culture brehs

 

[GetInTheTruck]

First off, We are the most diverse people on the planet. my sons don't have wooly hair.. their mom's don't..(1 from cuba, 1 is a mixed irish jamican, and 1 is an ethicity that i won't mention cuz i dissed it too much on here) - they are all black.

That lil girl in that pic is less white washed than I am... her roots are less removed from African than most african americans. She comes from some of the first people out of Africa. So to me she is black - plus she's darker than half of AA.

2) you find all sorts of traits in Africa. take away skin color you find many 'asian' looking people native to Africa.

3) The obvious is usually the case. When we set up all these rules then we start to make up classifications for original people that are not needed.
Around 6 or 7 thousand years ago human's started to develop the ability to have light and white skin.... this is just a reaction that will go away relatively soon - In the mean time we don't need to divide up all the brown people on Earth, they are mostly black. Some Eurasians are white.

We have different cultures, but u can't post pics of people darker than half of african americans and expect people to not call them black.

and yea - wooly hair gives you even more of a clue that someone has african roots.

That Indian girl is more African than African Americans? Listen to yourself, my god.

 

[ltheghost]

Listen we have been told by Fox News that Jesus is WHITE and so is Santa Clause. That should let you know all you need to know about the truth!!!

Meanwhile on Fox News...They are reporting the end of the world.........look at the ticker.