Jesus may have been from Nigeria....

[LionofJudah]

@LionofJudah

Can you come in here and verify that God hates Africa/Africans?

And can you also show everyone how Africans aren't actually black people? Lol

I never said that, and I damn sure never stated Africans aren't Black because that would be stupid. Do you EVER stop lying?

 

[LionofJudah]

Czar be showing up like the police.

He's a dirty Khazar pretending to be a Jew, while pretending to be a former Hebrew Israelite, while pretending to be Black to spread his lies. What's funny is people are waking up to his lies and disinformation, and I knew this about him the first time he quoted me.

 

[Czar]

He's a dirty Khazar pretending to be a Jew, while pretending to be a former Hebrew Israelite, while pretending to be Black to spread his lies. What's funny is people are waking up to his lies and disinformation, and I knew this about him the first time he quoted me.

Riiiiiiiight

I'ma "Khazarian", "Edomite", "Agent"... and every other lie you can think of.

Meanwhile in reality land, I'm black and you're a c00n.

I used to be just like you until I got outta that lie.

 

[Czar]

I never said that, and I damn sure never stated Africans aren't Black because that would be stupid. Do you EVER stop lying?

Lol you can't be serious @LionofJudah

Biblically speaking, not really. Ham is the progenitor (father) of the dark races, which are the Africans. Negroes however, are not descendants of Ham, we are descendant of Shem. From Zondervan Bible Dictionary-

The Negro in America being African is one of the greatest lies that has ever been told. Now, Israel (some, maybe even most) lived in Africa for centuries so they probably did mix with Africans to an extent. The seedline is carried through the father though, so if the father was an Israelite and the mother was an African, the child is an Israelite. If it's vice versa, then no. But, we were commanded from Yahawah (God) to not mix with them, or anyone else. We were supposed to stay within the 12 tribes. There were certain times Yahawah allowed us to take wives of other nations, but we are supposed to stay holy (separate).

Deuteronomy 7:1-6

As far as whether the Chaldeans were Africans, I'd have to check because I don't know off-hand.

1. You grabbed someone else's FB pic of the Zondervan Bible Dictionary
2. That Dictionary ironically uses the Hamitic Hypothesis

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamitic#Hamitic_hypothesis

In the mid-19th century, the term Hamitic acquired a new meaning as a few European writers claimed to identify a distinct "Hamitic race" that was superior to "Negroid" populations of Sub-Saharan Africa. The theory arose from early anthropological writers, who linked the stories in the Bible of Ham's sons to actual ancient migrations of a supposed Middle-Eastern sub-group of the Caucasian race.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caucasian_race#Physical_anthropology

Skin color amongst Caucasoids ranges greatly from pale, reddish-white, olive, through to dark brown tones.

Then again, you really don't bother researching the stuff being said by these clowns.




And you wonder why we don't get along.

 

[Czar]

This is the typa c00nery you support @LionofJudah

 

[LionofJudah]

Now, out of everything you just quoted, show me where I said Africans aren't Black, or that I said God hates them. Plus, nowhere in the Zondervan does it subscribe to a Hamitic Hypothesis. It simply says NEGROES ARE NOT HAMITIC. Try again.

@LionofJudah

Can you come in here and verify that God hates Africa/Africans?

And can you also show everyone how Africans aren't actually black people? Lol

 

[Czar]

Now, out of everything you just quoted, show me where I said Africans aren't Black, or that I said God hates them.

Biblically speaking, not really. Ham is the progenitor (father) of the dark races, which are the Africans. Negroes however, are not descendants of Ham, we are descendant of Shem. From Zondervan Bible Dictionary-

The Negro in America being African is one of the greatest lies that has ever been told.

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Negro
Ne·gro(n

gr

)
n. pl. Ne·groes Often Offensive
1. A Black person. See Usage Note at black.
2. A member of the Negroid race. Not in scientific use.
[Spanish and Portuguese negro, black, Black person, from Latin niger, nigr-, black; see nekw-t- in Indo-European roots.]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negro

The word negro denotes 'black' in the Spanish and Portuguese, derived from the ancient Latin word, niger, 'black', which itself ultimately is probably from a Proto-Indo-Europeanroot*nekw-, 'to be dark', akin to *nokw- 'night'.p

Or are you forgetting the term Negro was used by the Spaniards & Portuguese for Africans. Since they didn't use it for the Jews living in their countries.


As for hating Africans.... You've openly stated that everyone who isn't a natural born Israelite is going into slavery or is gonna be destroyed. Or do you need me to pull up those quotes as well?

 

[LionofJudah]

Or are you forgetting the term Negro was used by the Spaniards & Portuguese for Africans. Since they didn't use it for the Jews living in their country.


As for hating Africans.... You've openly stated that everyone who isn't a natural born Israelite is going into slavery or is gonna be destroyed. Or do you need me to pull up those quotes as well?

Again, the Zondervan who is made by Biblical scholars, also claim the Negroes are NOT Hamitic. There's only three people who could have been the progenitors of the Negroes, Ham, Shem, or Japheth. If we eliminate Ham, there's only Shem and Japheth left. Japheth (who you claim is white people which is a lie) is out of the question (they are really the Asians). The ONLY one that is left is Shem, who the chosen seed of Israel comes from. You're cutting yourself bringing up these posts. You actually linked wikipedia pages (which clearly say Ham's definition was changed to make a Hamitic Hypothesis by CAUCASIANS) to discredit Biblical scholars. You're a liar.

And please post the scriptures regarding slavery. Those I did make and the Bible says it, so it's going to come to pass. You can try to turn Blacks on this board against me, but you don't realize I don't give a fukk. The Most High is ONLY DEALING WITH ISRAEL.

 

[Czar]

Now, out of everything you just quoted, show me where I said Africans aren't Black, or that I said God hates them. Plus, nowhere in the Zondervan does it subscribe to a Hamitic Hypothesis. It simply says NEGROES ARE NOT HAMITIC. Try again.

Biblically speaking, not really. Ham is the progenitor (father) of the dark races, which are the Africans. Negroes however, are not descendants of Ham, we are descendant of Shem. From Zondervan Bible Dictionary-

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamitic#Hamitic_hypothesis

In the mid-19th century, the term Hamitic acquired a new meaning as a few European writers claimed to identify a distinct "Hamitic race" that was superior to "Negroid" populations of Sub-Saharan Africa. The theory arose from early anthropological writers, who linked the stories in the Bible of Ham's sons to actual ancient migrations of a supposed Middle-Eastern sub-group of the Caucasian race.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caucasian_race#Physical_anthropology

Skin color amongst Caucasoids ranges greatly from pale, reddish-white, olive, through to dark brown tones.

 

[Czar]

Again, the Zondervan who is made by Biblical scholars...

...Who use the Hamitic Hypothesis.

What part of that are you NOT getting?

 

[LionofJudah]

...Who use the Hamitic Hypothesis.

What part of that are you NOT getting?

Okay, so if you're going to claim that, then YOU have to tell us who they claim Negroes come from because they've already stated it's not Ham. I'll give you a hint, the available choices are Japheth and Shem.

 

[Czar]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamitic#Hamitic_hypothesis

In the mid-19th century, the term Hamitic acquired a new meaning as a few European writers claimed to identify a distinct "Hamitic race" that was superior to "Negroid" populations of Sub-Saharan Africa. The theory arose from early anthropological writers, who linked the stories in the Bible of Ham's sons to actual ancient migrations of a supposed Middle-Eastern sub-group of the Caucasian race.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caucasian_race#Physical_anthropology

Skin color amongst Caucasoids ranges greatly from pale, reddish-white, olive, through to dark brown tones.

 

[Czar]

Okay, so if you're going to claim that, then YOU have to tell us who they claim Negroes come from because they've already stated it's not Ham. I'll give you a hint, the available choices are Japheth and Shem.

Or are you forgetting the term Negro was used by the Spaniards & Portuguese for Africans. Since they didn't use it for the Jews living in their countries.

 

[Czar]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negro

Around 1442 the Portuguese first arrived in sub-Saharan Africa while trying to find a sea route to India. The term negro, literally meaning "black", was used by the Spanish and Portuguese as a simple description to refer to people. From the 18th century to the late 1960s, "negro" (later capitalized) was considered to be the proper English-language term for certain people of sub-Saharan African origin.

 

[Northern Son]

Question... do you consider these people to be black?

Cause according to @iLLaV3 they're not, since they don't have "woolly hair"

That's just semantics. Black as in "negro" in the west just means sub-Saharan African, unless you're willing to accept Koreans, Chinese, Japanese and albinos as white people.

They're not black people.