Jellyfish UFO's captured on military weapons camera

Outlaw

New Hope For the HaveNotz
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
5,785
Reputation
278
Daps
18,510
Reppin
Buzz City, NC :blessed:
If it was an alien of any sort, like some people are suggesting, then you have to answer some odd questions.


Why is it so peculiarly shaped, but none of those shapes do anything? All those weird bumps and parts, but literally not one of them moves in any way the entire time?

Why does the object just float in a straight line the entire time, apparently incapable of changing its course?

Why would it be floating over a military base in the first place? Even if it wanted to observe the base for some strange reason, couldn't it have done that from much further away?



There's literally zero reason to think it's an alien, and several logical reasons to suggest that's a weak explanation. It doesn't "do" anything remarkable the entire time. It's just floating in a line. If it's not somethin stuck to the housing/lens, then it's probably just a bunch of oddly shaped balloons. People in Iraq like their balloons in bunches too.

EID000013.jpg
kit-5-big-balloons-eid-mubarak-moon-and-stars.jpg
3-27-eid-mubarak-decorations-combo-set-with-banner-balloons-original-imagzcp9q8y68jt2.jpeg
71c+KTYF4+L.jpg




Someone made a hypothetical graphic of what a bunch of Eid balloons mashed together might look like:

eidballoons-png.65020
Crazy amount of hubris displayed here.

Why should aliens exponentially more intelligent than you conform into your narrow view on how they should act?
 

↓R↑LYB

I trained Sheng Long and Shonuff
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
44,204
Reputation
13,759
Daps
171,174
Reppin
Pawgistan
Yeah these dudes not some scrubs sitting at home talking about this

Fravors actually pursued it.. had actual eyeballs on it. That shyt was in 2004

And they were told NOT to mention it either. Don’t even bring it up. He reached out to others to get then to discuss it and only one did, a female pilot.. everyone else told him don’t bring that shyt up again

He was actually bugged by Corbell so much he was pissed at him about it.

There was also supposed to be more whistleblowers in that hearing but only those 3 came forward. Mainly because it was a hazard to pilots, hazards to National Security, and because Grusch was there
Rep Burchett said in this interview that during the last hearing people he had lined up were told not to come. He has a new set of witnesses but he's not disclosing them so that they won't be intimidated before the hearing.

 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,696
Daps
203,905
Reppin
the ether
Mick West's opinion on the video after a few days of sifting the data with a bunch of people and running simulations.



Some of the discussion/data: Jellyfish UFO from TMZ's 'UFO Revolution'


summary of his views:

* Satellite imagery suggests the incident occurred in 2017, not 2018 as was claimed by Corbell

* Extremely long focal length of lens (one source says 3000mm) precludes anything on the lens or particularly close to it

* Color of object changes only when background objects also change, so clearly camera settings that are shifting, not temperature. Corbell's claims that the object is changing temperature are false.

* Camera apparently tethered, so object is exhibiting true movement compared to background.

* Using special computer programs to model the movement assuming a fixed tethered blimp camera positioned near tether launch pad, using roof angle to determine height of blimp, and using the line of sight with background objects as a guide to estimate potential positions of object, the best path match appears to be a straight line at 1800 feet elevation moving 10mph.

* This path appears consistent with wind direction from observed flag movement in the video

* This path explains why no one on the ground saw it (too high in the dark)

* The height explains why object shows little jostling or other movements - at that height, the air is simply a mass moving in one direction.

* That path is not certain. It could be closer, smaller, and slower; or further, larger, and faster

* Thermal signature of objects is consistent with balloons

* Second video, claimed by Corbell to be the same object over water, was actually several miles away in the wrong direction and clearly over sand. By appearances, looks like a seperate incident entirely, but it's also consistent with balloons.

* Mick's best guess is that it's a bunch of balloons, perhaps draped with streamers and other decorations

* Object could also be a ultra-atmospheric jellyfish-like lifeform or a transdimensional probe that just happens to look and and act exactly like a bunch of balloons, but this is less likely



I didn't read the thread closely enough to verify the accuracy of everything he says in the video, but the data is there for anyone who wants to look.
 

AngryBaby

All Star
Joined
Oct 13, 2014
Messages
4,346
Reputation
180
Daps
11,933
Mick West's opinion on the video after a few days of sifting the data with a bunch of people and running simulations.



Some of the discussion/data: Jellyfish UFO from TMZ's 'UFO Revolution'


summary of his views:

* Satellite imagery suggests the incident occurred in 2017, not 2018 as was claimed by Corbell

* Extremely long focal length of lens (one source says 3000mm) precludes anything on the lens or particularly close to it

* Color of object changes only when background objects also change, so clearly camera settings that are shifting, not temperature. Corbell's claims that the object is changing temperature are false.

* Camera apparently tethered, so object is exhibiting true movement compared to background.

* Using special computer programs to model the movement assuming a fixed tethered blimp camera positioned near tether launch pad, using roof angle to determine height of blimp, and using the line of sight with background objects as a guide to estimate potential positions of object, the best path match appears to be a straight line at 1800 feet elevation moving 10mph.

* This path appears consistent with wind direction from observed flag movement in the video

* This path explains why no one on the ground saw it (too high in the dark)

* The height explains why object shows little jostling or other movements - at that height, the air is simply a mass moving in one direction.

* That path is not certain. It could be closer, smaller, and slower; or further, larger, and faster

* Thermal signature of objects is consistent with balloons

* Second video, claimed by Corbell to be the same object over water, was actually several miles away in the wrong direction and clearly over sand. By appearances, looks like a seperate incident entirely, but it's also consistent with balloons.

* Mick's best guess is that it's a bunch of balloons, perhaps draped with streamers and other decorations

* Object could also be a ultra-atmospheric jellyfish-like lifeform or a transdimensional probe that just happens to look and and act exactly like a bunch of balloons, but this is less likely



I didn't read the thread closely enough to verify the accuracy of everything he says in the video, but the data is there for anyone who wants to look.



Strange how some people can look at something inuitively, and tell it isn't something attached to the housing or a smudge. And others take quite a long time to get to that same point lol

Sigh...2 days...and was right all along.

Anywho...

The only dangerous game Mick West is playing, is that he's giving one specific answer to what this is. Balloons.

Well alot more people are aware of balloon behavior and physics so it opens this up to more scrutiny. So if its found out that it can't be balloons, and its determined that it is not a smudge or somethjng on the housing. Then he doesn't know. Which again is alot of work just to come to same spot certain people already could see intuitively lol.

I have questions about the Balloon scenario though,

- how close were they to civilization? Were there any birthdays or parties that day?

-the movment is still stiff even for a balloon bunch. Which is why alot of skeptics chose a smudge over balloons because they intuitively understand that balloons wouldnt move THAT stiffly with wind and having individual parts.

I do appreciate the distinction of interdimensional object versus space object though. Certain aspects of that fall more in line with Grusch's assertions.

@Professor Emeritus could consider responding to things that he deems... fair lol

Just posting claims and not engaging in discussion about said claims is an act of preserving biases. Might as well not post
 

O.T.I.S.

Veteran
Joined
Sep 15, 2013
Messages
74,042
Reputation
15,615
Daps
284,894
Reppin
The Truth
Strange how some people can look at something inuitively, and tell it isn't something attached to the housing or a smudge. And others take quite a long time to get to that same point lol

Sigh...2 days...and was right all along.

Anywho...

The only dangerous game Mick West is playing, is that he's giving one specific answer to what this is. Balloons.

Well alot more people are aware of balloon behavior and physics so it opens this up to more scrutiny. So if its found out that it can't be balloons, and its determined that it is not a smudge or somethjng on the housing. Then he doesn't know. Which again is alot of work just to come to same spot certain people already could see intuitively lol.

I have questions about the Balloon scenario though,

- how close were they to civilization? Were there any birthdays or parties that day?

-the movment is still stiff even for a balloon bunch. Which is why alot of skeptics chose a smudge over balloons because they intuitively understand that balloons wouldnt move THAT stiffly with wind and having individual parts.

I do appreciate the distinction of interdimensional object versus space object though. Certain aspects of that fall more in line with Grusch's assertions.

@Professor Emeritus could consider responding to things that he deems... fair lol

Just posting claims and not engaging in discussion about said claims is an act of preserving biases. Might as well not post
Bruh please stop giving this guy attention
 

AngryBaby

All Star
Joined
Oct 13, 2014
Messages
4,346
Reputation
180
Daps
11,933
Pentagon comments on jellyfish vid



They seem pretty annoyed that it leaked lol and could have easily dismissed this as balloons to save an embarassment, yet they didnt do that....

Makes me think its not balloons lol
 

O.T.I.S.

Veteran
Joined
Sep 15, 2013
Messages
74,042
Reputation
15,615
Daps
284,894
Reppin
The Truth
Pentagon comments on jellyfish vid



They seem pretty annoyed that it leaked lol and could have easily dismissed this as balloons to save an embarassment, yet they didnt do that....

Makes me think its not balloons lol

They need to process the release

Usually they own up to leaks though. Everyone with a brain can see thats not no balloons, and lying might bring out more shyt.. like the full video
 

WaveCapsByOscorp™

2021 Grammy Award Winner
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
18,979
Reputation
-426
Daps
45,142
funny thing, was walking around town yesterday, listening to some audiobooks and the thought crossed my mind, what if one of those jellyfish mfers been following me around town this WHOLE time?

:pachaha:
 

AngryBaby

All Star
Joined
Oct 13, 2014
Messages
4,346
Reputation
180
Daps
11,933
funny thing, was walking around town yesterday, listening to some audiobooks and the thought crossed my mind, what if one of those jellyfish mfers been following me around town this WHOLE time?

:pachaha:

Well thats why i find it funny when its argued that people that arent trying to immediately debunk it, are people that REALLY want this to be real.

No, actually its fukking scary the implications of what it would mean if this were something...intelligent and not human made, abd not visible to the human eye. I actually don't want that to be real lol. But I will tell you when a benign debunk theory doesnt make sense.
 
Top