Jellyfish UFO's captured on military weapons camera

[Mook]

We got 4k video cameras in our pockets and this what the military camera is supposedly capable of?

 

[Professor Emeritus]

We got 4k video cameras in our pockets and this what the military camera is supposedly capable of?

Object appears to either be fairly insubstantial and not emiting much energy, or not in focus. That's probably as well as the camera can do under those circumstances.

There are plenty of situations where military cameras can do far better, but then it would be too obvious what the object was, and then it would be a non-story. It's the same reason that the majority of UFO sightings occur at night, and the same reason that Bigfoot photos/videos are always blurry. Anything that was in-focus and clearly detailed would no longer be able to be passed off as alien anymore. The entire phenomena is eternally caught in the "low information zone", where the only things talked about are those where there isn't enough info to confirm it but not enough to conclusively debunk it either. And that's how it will always be - the low information zone is not going to go away.

 

[Mook]

Object appears to either be fairly insubstantial and not emiting much energy, or not in focus. That's probably as well as the camera can do under those circumstances.

There are plenty of situations where military cameras can do far better, but then it would be too obvious what the object was, and then it would be a non-story. It's the same reason that the majority of UFO sightings occur at night, and the same reason that Bigfoot photos/videos are always blurry. Anything that was in-focus and clearly detailed would no longer be able to be passed off as alien anymore. The entire phenomena is eternally caught in the "low information zone", where the only things talked about are those where there isn't enough info to confirm it but not enough to conclusively debunk it either. And that's how it will always be - the low information zone is not going to go away.

Epstein is the trump card here and really exposed these fools. a real deal conspiracy was played out right in front of the world and nothing happened.

 

[Dzali OG]

Where u hear this from?

I really can't remember where I read this from, it was over 15 years ago when I first heard this. There are various youtubes tho. I'll see if I can link one I just watched like last week.







I think these include some info.

I need to find another youtube I recently saw where they were talking about biological organisms which accompany hurricanes and tornadoes. Organisms which can be a hundred feet long but their bodies have the consistency of jellyfish or lighter. Enabling them to live in the air.

 

[Lord Beasley]

We got 4k video cameras in our pockets and this what the military camera is supposedly capable of?

this allegedly occurred in 2017. But tell me how the shyt can make out features of the individuals walking, yet the supposed jellyfish is blurry this video doesn't prove shyt

 

[AngryBaby]

The obvious issue being that spider skins are produced 2 billion times every second, while not a single alien has ever been verified even once.

If you can't factor base rate probabilities into your reasoning, you will always have faulty reasoning. The ONLY way that an alien could be "just as plausible" as a spider skin or balloons is if the evidence for alien was literally billions of times stronger than the evidence for a mundane object.





I don't know give a shyt about "Trust me bro" evidence. Show me the actual evidence and then I'll factor it in. I've already proven that Jeremy Corbell and others are lying about one aspect of the video, why should I believe them about anything else?

The fact that all of you still refuse to admit the settings are changing, and not the object's temperature, is wild.

But yet the object in question is significantly lighter and darker than everything in the background. And your only explanation for that is that it MUST be something on the camera or something more transparent. Despite the fact that it can only be seen on infrared. If it were balloons or a spider, itwould be able to be seen in regular camera settings.

You dont think they even viewed this through regular settings?

 

[AngryBaby]

this allegedly occurred in 2017. But tell me how the shyt can make out features of the individuals walking, yet the supposed jellyfish is blurry this video doesn't prove shyt

It's caught on an infrared camera

 

[Lord Beasley]

But yet the object in question is significantly lighter and darker than everything in the background. And your only explanation for that is that it MUST be something on the camera or something more transparent. Despite the fact that it can only be seen on infrared. If it were balloons or a spider, itwould be able to be seen in regular camera settings.

Just because the camera is only in infrared doesn't mean it can only be seen in those modes. Where the hell did you get that assessment?


Y'all are pulling stuff out of your ass here. The camera is attached to a stationary balloon. That could've been anything from birdshyt to bugsplatt

 

[AngryBaby]

Considering that these IR cameras are literally designed to look past bugs, and splatter, and mud, and actual objects on the camera like tape or something stuck on it... so the thing that the IR is designed to not look at, it apparently looked at this one time. Even though it doesn't even track like a spider skin, or move like a spider skin falling lol. Now if you said a balloon, now that would make sense and a likely candidate. But you said a spider skin. So unfortunately that goes in the same bucket as the alien theory.



You do give a chit about "trust me bro" evidence because when those threads are posted here, it's a guarantee that you're right up in the thread letting your feelings known lol. Lets be honest... you didn't prove anything. You read it from MetaBunk and just copy/pasted from there.

But like I said you're in luck! There is growing support for evidence to be released to the public, and the ICIG and Congress are aware of certain things that we previously weren't in this subject, thanks to Grusch. I know you're very uninformed on him and that topic

So @Professor Emeritus was fukking wrong. And we spent hours in here explaining why the spider dirt thing made no sense.

And I was right that they vetted that type of information.

 

[AngryBaby]

Just because the camera is only in infrared doesn't mean it can only be seen in those modes. Where the hell did you get that assessment?


Y'all are pulling stuff out of your ass here. The camera is attached to a stationary balloon. That could've been anything from birdshyt to bugsplatt

They literally said it could only be seen in infrared. So your position literally just has to be " i dont believe that" lol well okay then

And the post above shows they are aware of the concept of a smudge or bugs on the camera and IR looks past that.

 

[Lord Beasley]

They literally said it could only be seen in infrared. So your position literally just has to be " i dont believe that" lol well okay then

And the post above shows they are aware of the concept of a smudge or bugs on the camera and IR looks past that.

I'm not believing the words of fukking liars, you're right. The OG video has no words, you're believing commentary from a proven liar

 

[GoldenGlove]

It's 2024 and we still have blurry, dark, indistinguishable and trash UFO photos.

 

[AngryBaby]

I'm not believing the words of fukking liars, you're right. The OG video has no words, you're believing commentary from a proven liar

Theres been video of video experts and people on the base telling you it not a bug or a smudge....

Im just saying it isnt that. Why do you want to believe it's a smudge so badly? Theres more opinions from the base weighing against that.

Why did you ignore the militray guy saying that IR looksa past smudges or bugs and tbey get that all the time?

 

[Lord Beasley]

Theres been video of video experts abd people on the base telling you it not a bug ir a smudge....

Im just saying it isnt that. Why do you want to believe it's a smudge so badly? Theres more opinions from the base weighing against that.

Why did you ignore the militray guy saying that IR looksa past smudges or bugs and tbey get that all the time?

Birdshyt is a possibility too. I don't know wtf it is, but it's certainly not a UAP. Y'all act like video experts have concrete evidence and military nikkas don't lie for attention just like any other human.

I want proof of aliens I believe exist, just like you, but this ain't it breh

 

[AngryBaby]

Birdshyt is a possibility too. I don't know wtf it is, but it's certainly not a UAP. Y'all act like video experts have concrete evidence and military nikkas don't lie for attention just like any other human.

I want proof of aliens I believe exist, just like you, but this ain't it breh

I never said it was an alien, but I just dont believe its something on the lens based on the IR and the video itself. Its moving independent from the reticle, the reticle is moving all around and the thing is somewhere else.

I think deep down you know that if it ISNT a smudge or balloons, then its bizarre. Thats why so many people want it to be a smudge lol

A spider dangling from a web...idk...i think there'd be movement or sway. And they even said IR looks past that.