The company is majority white, and still has that ingrained culture of white nerds who flood online spaces who try to apply technocratic viewpoints to social interactions to pretend that minorities aren't qualified to work with him.
James Damore dumbass Manifesto got him fired, now thinks KKK names are cool.
Stop gas lighting black people, cac.
I know how you all communicate better than you think. I hear all the dog-whistles.
Its the same spewing of fake-facts, misinterpreted data, and disingenuous statistics to create some half-assed narrative that justifies him thinking his conservative views matter.
On top of that, he got too comfortable at work.
All the free food, perks, events, and resources made him think that google cared about his opinion.
They don't.
Not all roles in tech are created equal, breh.
Yes. If you're hiring software engineer, computer scientist, IC designer, etc., skill is skill and hiring decisions should be made to acquire the best talent.
But, there are many other roles at these tech companies that aren't as mission critical.
I've worked in tech, breh. I've seen a bunch of lazy ass cacs and asians who pull down good money for doing very little value-added work.
Our recruiting efforts were pulling those lesser talents from the same schools as our elite talent.
My argument would be that tech companies should continue to recruit at the elite schools for the mission critical talent. Stanford, MIT, Cal Tech, Berkeley, Carnegie Mellon, Georgia Tech, etc.
But, for the non-mission critical roles, expand the recruiting to include schools with larger minority representation, including HBCUs.
Inferior versus superior talent really comes down to the role you're trying to fill as a recruiter.
If I'm a recruiter at Nvidia trying to find a chip designer, you're damn right I'm going to Stanford, Berkeley, MIT, etc. to find them.
If I'm looking for a person to do technical sales, does that person really have to come from Stanford, Berkeley, MIT, etc.? I'd argue that the skills needed to succeed in that role can be honed and acquired anywhere.
But, at these top tech companies, they work to fill all roles with the same homogenous talent from the same 5-10 schools.
And those 5-10 schools aren't very diverse. That's the fundamental problem.
Tech isn't 100% customer facing like management consulting. For management consulting, they are justified in sourcing from top MBA programs, solely. Being able to consistently put Harvard, Stanford, MIT, etc. MBAs in front of clients is part of the story they sell to potential clients.
Do you care if the power management block in your iPhone is designed by a Stanford IC designer or one from Arizona State or one from Alabama State? You just want it to work.
Last edited:
come back when you can address the memo that was written and not just make shyt up based on your own "stereotypes" or feelings
Go read the memo. Its straight out of right-wing web forums that try to use academic arguments to find reasons to put minorities in their place on the white man pyramid.
come back when you can address the memo that was written and not just make shyt up based on your own "stereotypes" or feelings
its hard enough to get those jobs.
Then you got weirdo white guys who sit on these right wing forums eating up this garbage with these weak fake-academic arguments about how women and minorities are "genetically" predispositioned from contributing to society in the eyes of white men who just wanna work in piece.
The real problem is that all that free beer at work got him fukked up.
He thought google was this open place where anyone can talk about anything they want.
The thing is, its not some liberal place either. They don't give a fukk about your thoughts. They want you to work, and thats it.
Dude get too comfortable thinking he was back in college.
speaking of stereotypes and all these pre-conceived notions of what silicon valley is or looks like.
The majority of the top companies in silicon valley were either founded or have CEO's that are minorities....or female.
Google
Microsoft
Yahoo
IBM
Youtube
Pinterest
InfoSys
the list goes on.
The majority of the top companies in silicon valley were either founded or have CEO's that are minorities....or female.
Microsoft
Yahoo
IBM
Youtube
InfoSys
the list goes on.
LOL,
it isn't, stop being so dishonest. You'll get your daps bruh, no need to pander to the lowest common denominator by peddling bullshyt.
you could get paid to defend crypto white supremacists, you know.
NOT FOUNDED.
They may have gotten minority CEOS, but the boards are white, the founders are white, and the execs are white.
A CEO is a face.
Dog-whistles don't have quotes
all this "women are genetically disposed to..." bullshyt.
Keep it to your personal blog.
yea, thats what I thought.
you can't back up your claims because they are baseless. Quote the memo where he is saying what you re saying. Or let it go.
and you've showed your cards, cac.
