Why not always draft the potential superstar? The NBA is a business and Green is marketable with a massive upside. If he didn't pan out no one would really blame Detroit, but if he becomes the next Kobe we'll all look back at detroit like
I’m almost willing to bet Jalen scores no less than 30 against the Pistons. He has that game circled, highlighted, stamped, and emphasized. I think he’s gonna try to embarrass the Pistons. Cade’s gonna have to come out with that same mentality
because they view Cade as that too, just with a higher floor. This was a draft where 4-5 guys are viewed as potential superstars.Why not always draft the potential superstar? The NBA is a business and Green is marketable with a massive upside. If he didn't pan out no one would really blame Detroit, but if he becomes the next Kobe we'll all look back at detroit like
Just like you died on that Wiseman hill, despite there being better fits in the draft?because they view Cade as that too, just with a higher floor. This was a draft where 4-5 guys are viewed as potential superstars.
You're also looking at it the wrong way. Cade was the consensus #1 pick. He's the guy who takes the pressure off Detroit if he doesn't pan out since most people woulda took Cade.
Green is a better fit, but y'all die on that BPA hill.
I would’ve said Portland Batum but his defense isn’t nearly as good as BatumsWho do y'all compare Cades game to as far as strengths, similar style, visual similarities, ect?
Swag said he could end up like ORL Mike Miller.I would’ve said Portland Batum but his defense isn’t nearly as good as Batums
He WAS the fit pick though.Just like you died on that Wiseman hill, despite there being better fits in the draft?
A traditional big man, who can't play like a traditional big man because he's been taught to play on the perimeter his entire life, and who can't shoot. Is that really a fit alongside Draymond, who also can't shoot, is reluctant to even shoot, and plays his best ball at the 5?He WAS the fit pick though.
A bench player you say? That's what Wiseman is going to be this season.If you think adding a bench player is a better fit, then
A traditional big man, who can't play like a traditional big man because he's been taught to play on the perimeter his entire life, and who can't shoot. Is that really a fit alongside Draymond, who also can't shoot, is reluctant to even shoot, and plays his best ball at the 5?
That's the best fit to you?
A bench player you say? That's what Wiseman is going to be this season.
They could've signed a big man in FA on the low that would've provided greater value and impact than Wiseman did last season. I really don't know how anyone could possibly look at Wiseman prior to the draft and believe for one second he was the best fit; not in terms of development (which was going to take a longer than almost every player in the lottery), direction of the league (Wiseman is a dinosaur who's masquerading as someone who can stretch the floor), and fit for the Warriors style of play.As opposed to anyone else who plays the same positions of the guys you're paying max deals to? if Wiseman ain't the future solution, so be it, but then they have no realistic solutions that can win them a title from their bigs. Without that, at best they're a fun exciting team with a fatal flaw they can't fix.
By the time time that Wiseman gets it right (if he ever does), the core of Steph, Klay and Draymond will be done. No matter what you try to tell yourself, he was never the right fit for this team. We've already seen that, if anyone, LaMelo was the right fit, which shouldn't really come as any surprise given he fits right in with the direction the league has been headed over the last half a decade.and they're not a title contender until either he gets right or they get a way better option that isn't out there. If you're arguing that they're in a can't win situation, the evidence is there. 3 lotto picks and all they can do is hope Kenny Atkinson works his magic.
They could've signed a big man in FA on the low that would've provided greater value and impact than Wiseman did last season. I really don't know how anyone could possibly look at Wiseman prior to the draft and believe for one second he was the best fit; not in terms of development (which was going to take a longer than almost every player in the lottery), direction of the league (Wiseman is a dinosaur who's masquerading as someone who can stretch the floor), and fit for the Warriors style of play.
Wiseman struck out in all those three key areas of fit.
And I don't see where you're going with this, considering the Warriors won a title in 2015 when they benched Bogut in the Finals, with Draymond moving to the 5; ran it back in 2016 with a similar big rotation, and were only one shot away from going back-to-back; then had a similar big rotation with KD in three years he was on the team.
By the time time that Wiseman gets it right (if he ever does), the core of Steph, Klay and Draymond will be done. No matter what you try to tell yourself, he was never the right fit for this team. We've already seen that, if anyone, LaMelo was the right fit, which shouldn't really come as any surprise given he fits right in with the direction the league has been headed over the last half a decade.
because they view Cade as that too, just with a higher floor. This was a draft where 4-5 guys are viewed as potential superstars.
You're also looking at it the wrong way. Cade was the consensus #1 pick. He's the guy who takes the pressure off Detroit if he doesn't pan out since most people woulda took Cade.
Green is a better fit, but y'all die on that BPA hill.
Kids not going to footlocker for the Cade 1's
"Y'all got them Cade's in white" - said nobody
meanwhile kids gonna be lining for the JG's