See above.You're not really saying anything though. What argument are you trying to make exactly?
What I've tried to illustrate to you in the past, is that failing to player a limited role player over another limited role player isn't that problem. The makeup of the roster was the problem. I don't see how you can blame Thibs for that, as if it was going to make any notable difference. Ad nauseum - it starts with the front office decision not to sign/trade for proper bench/role playing pieces.
Breh, THAT'S NOT DEFENDING IT. That's explaining to you that it wouldn't have changed shyt because it wasn't the underlying problem. It ran deeper than that, to the point where it wasn't even a problem - such a surface issue which is down the list of priorities on what the Bulls should be changing. I've already made it known that Hinrich shouldn't even be in the league.You were certainly defending Thibs decision to play Hinrich over Snell/Moore, because you claimed it wouldnt have changed the outcome.
And that's fair enough if you believe that, however, that's like worrying about putting a band-aid on a scratch on your arm when you've got a broken leg. It pales in comparison to the REAL problems with this team.Whether thats true or not, it was still a poor decision for Thibs to consistently play Hinrich over those guys