ITS OVER: 2015-16 Chicago Bulls Season Thread

Win Total in Playoffs

  • 16 #OptimisticBullsFan

  • 12

  • 8

  • 4

  • Fire GARPAX


Results are only viewable after voting.

Brozay

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
62,839
Reputation
7,081
Daps
180,203
Snell & Moore are both clearly better than Hinrich

I dont know what else there is to say

Would have playing/developing them in the rotation all season pushed us past CLE? I dunno, who gives a shyt?

It was still a horrible decision by Thibs to consistently trot out Hinrich over those guys

Im not even sure what argument @Gil Scott-Heroin is trying to make
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
83,633
Reputation
8,748
Daps
225,705
Blah blah blah nikka.
Just as I thought - you don't have any evidence behind these lies. Cause I never said that Hinrich should be playing over Snell/Moore
There will be no spinning after you get this work.
There's no spinning shyt. I already fukkin provided evidence that contradicted what you believe I posted.
Trust, the bullshyt you spew might work on others, I'm not going.
STFU nikka. :mjlol:

I NEVER ONCE SAID THAT I WAS FINE WITH HINRICH PLAYIN OVER SNELL AND MOORE. I already quoted what I said last season that Hinrich shouldn't even be in the league.

AGAIN, I'LL ASK YOU, WHY ARE YOU LYING?
but I'm pretty sure both Moore and Snell will debunk your sentiment that they "ain't shyt" this season
They ain't shyt in that they're both bench/role players. Regardless of what happens this season - what I said about their abilities last season doesn't translate over to being the same. Clearly Moore and Snell were bench pieces last season. How could anyone argue otherwise?
 

Brozay

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
62,839
Reputation
7,081
Daps
180,203
Just as I thought - you don't have any evidence behind these lies. Cause I never said that Hinrich should be playing over Snell/Moore

There's no spinning shyt. I already fukkin provided evidence that contradicted what you believe I posted.

STFU nikka. :mjlol:

I NEVER ONCE SAID THAT I WAS FINE WITH HINRICH PLAYIN OVER SNELL AND MOORE. I already quoted what I said last season that Hinrich shouldn't even be in the league.

AGAIN, I'LL ASK YOU, WHY ARE YOU LYING?

They ain't shyt in that they're both bench/role players. Regardless of what happens this season - what I said about their abilities last season doesn't translate over to being the same. Clearly Moore and Snell were bench pieces last season. How could anyone argue otherwise?

You're not really saying anything though. What argument are you trying to make exactly?

You were certainly defending Thibs decision to play Hinrich over Snell/Moore, because you claimed it wouldnt have changed the outcome. Whether thats true or not, it was still a poor decision for Thibs to consistently play Hinrich over those guys
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
83,633
Reputation
8,748
Daps
225,705
Snell & Moore are both clearly better than Hinrich

I dont know what else there is to say
:snoop:

That's not the issue. Last season they were all BENCH PIECES (even arguable to be lucky to get any minutes in the league).
Would have playing/developing them in the rotation all season pushed us past CLE? I dunno, who gives a shyt?

It was still a horrible decision by Thibs to consistently trot out Hinrich over those guys

Im not even sure what argument @Gil Scott-Heroin is trying to make
=
If Noah/Taj have to be on the floor, and are the main ones responsible for the starting offense not running fluidly; the cumulative effect that leads to this thought dependence on playing a role player other another role player clearly isn't the problem here. Hell if playing Hinrich over Snell/Moore was an ACTUAL problem for this Bulls team, can't you see that ultimately it wouldn't mean a thing because it would have little-to-no influence on this team's chances of winning - because they'd already be in a position of winning.

Thibs has been taking unnecessary flak for how the Bulls have been performing. A lot of this shyt that has been expected of him is unreasonable.
My argument is that failing to play Snell/Moore over Hinrich wasn't the problem with this Bulls team, and it's silly to think otherwise. It wasn't going to change the outcome of that series - both of those players didn't have the ability (from whatever margin they have over Hinrich) to push the Bulls over the Cavs.
 

Jesus H. Christ

I died for your sins
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
16,627
Reputation
3,858
Daps
60,137
Has Kirk even played yet


Good

giphy.gif
 

El Jefe

Superstar
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
8,215
Reputation
784
Daps
16,771
Reppin
NULL
His lack of playmaking for a guy who needs the ball in his hands is just astounding. He misses so many open guys

Im more worried about Pau though, hes not going to fit into this offense. Im highly concerned about him

2 of my main concerns

Snell & Moore are both clearly better than Hinrich

I dont know what else there is to say

Would have playing/developing them in the rotation all season pushed us past CLE? I dunno, who gives a shyt?

It was still a horrible decision by Thibs to consistently trot out Hinrich over those guys

Im not even sure what argument @Gil Scott-Heroin is trying to make

I get the sentiment some what but tryin to say Moore n em ain't better then kirk naah

And thibs cost Us that series against the cavs ..there is no its n buts about it
 

Brozay

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
62,839
Reputation
7,081
Daps
180,203
@Gil Scott-Heroin

I still dont see your point. If you agree that Snell/Moore > Kirk, then how can you defend Thibs playing Kirk over them all season, regardless of how marginal the improvement is, there is still improvement and its making the team better

Its indefensible IMO
 
Top