It's Black History Month in HL brehs....

Deadpool1986

Cook with a Mouth
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
5,043
Reputation
6,765
Daps
18,775
Reppin
#midnightboyz/ #Neggas-Black & White/ #TNT
Sorry if this has already been posted.
Stono Rebellion
The Stono Rebellion (sometimes called Cato's Conspiracy or Cato's Rebellion) was a slave rebellion that commenced on 9 September 1739, in the colony of South Carolina. It was the largest slave uprising in the British mainland colonies prior to the American Revolution.[1]

One of the earliest known organized rebellions in the present United States, the uprising was led by native Africans who were Catholic and likely from the Kingdom of Kongo, which had been Catholic since 1491. Some of the Kongolese spoke Portuguese. Their leader, Jemmy (referred to in some reports as "Cato", and probably a slave belonging to the Cato, or Cater, family who lived just off the Ashley River and north of the Stono River) was a literate slave who led 20 other enslaved Kongolese, who may have been former soldiers, in an armed march south from the Stono River (for which the rebellion is named).

They recruited nearly 60 other slaves and killed 22–25 whites before being intercepted by the South Carolina militia near the Edisto River. In that battle, 20 whites and 44 slaves were killed, and the rebellion was largely suppressed. A group of slaves escaped and traveled another 30 miles (50 km) before battling a week later with the militia. Most of the captured slaves were executed; a few survived to be sold to the West Indies.

In response to the rebellion, the South Carolina legislature passed the Negro Act of 1740 restricting slave assembly, education, and movement. It also enacted a 10-year moratorium against importing African slaves, and established penalties against slaveholders' harsh treatment of slaves. It required legislative approval for manumissions, which slaveholders had previously been able to arrange privately.

Local factors
Since 1708, the majority of the population of the South Carolina colony were slaves, as importation of laborers from Africa had increased in recent decades with the expansion of cotton and rice cultivation. This was what was called the Plantation Generation by the historian Ira Berlin. Given the dramatic increase in importation, most of the slaves were native Africans[2] and many in South Carolina were from the Kingdom of Kongo. Numerous slaves had first been held in the British West Indies before being brought to South Carolina.

The slaves may have been inspired by several factors to mount their rebellion. Accounts of slaves' gaining freedom by escaping to Spanish Florida gave the Carolina slaves hope; the Spanish had issued a proclamation and had agents spread the word about giving freedom and land to slaves who got to Florida. Tensions between England and Spain over territory in North America made slaves hopeful of reaching Spanish territory, particularly the free black community of Fort Mose, founded in 1738. In addition, a malaria epidemic had killed many whites in Charleston, weakening the power of slaveholders. Lastly, historians have suggested the slaves organized their revolt to take place on Sunday, when planters would be occupied in church and might be unarmed. The Security Act of 1739 (which required all white males to carry arms even to church on Sundays) had been passed in August but not fully taken effect; penalties were supposed to begin after 29 September.[3]
 

Deadpool1986

Cook with a Mouth
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
5,043
Reputation
6,765
Daps
18,775
Reppin
#midnightboyz/ #Neggas-Black & White/ #TNT
African background
Jemmy, the leader of the revolt, was a literate slave described in an eyewitness account as "Angolan". Historian John K. Thornton has noted that, because of patterns of trade, he was more likely from the Kingdom of Kongo in west Central Africa, which had long had relations with Portuguese traders.[4] His cohort of 20 slaves were also called "Angolan", and likely also Kongolese. The slaves were described as Catholic, and some spoke Portuguese, learned from the traders operating in the Kongo Empire at the time. The patterns of trade and the fact that the Kongo was a Catholic nation point to their origin there. The Kingdom of Kongo had voluntarily converted to Catholicism in 1491; by the 18th century, the religion was a fundamental part of its citizens' identity. The nation had independent relations with Rome.[4]

Portuguese was the language of trade as well as the one of the languages of educated people in Kongo. The Portuguese-speaking slaves in South Carolina were more likely to learn about offers of freedom by Spanish agents. They would also have been attracted to the Catholicism of Spanish Florida. Because Kongo had been undergoing civil wars, more people had been captured and sold into slavery in recent years, among them trained soldiers. It is likely that Jemmy and his rebel cohort were such military men, as they fought hard against the militia when they were caught, and were able to kill 20 men.[4]

The events of the revolt
On Sunday, 9 September 1739, Jemmy gathered 20 enslaved Africans near the Stono River, 20 miles (30 km) southwest of Charleston. This date was important to them as the Catholic celebration of the Virgin Mary's nativity; like the religious symbols they used, taking action on this date connected their Catholic past with present purpose.[5] The Africans marched down the roadway with a banner that read "Liberty!", and chanted the same word in unison. They attacked Hutchenson's store at the Stono River Bridge, killing two storekeepers and seizing weapons and ammunition.

Raising a flag, the slaves proceeded south toward Spanish Florida, a well-known refuge for escapees. On the way, they gathered more recruits, sometimes reluctant ones, for a total of 80. They burned seven plantations and killed 20–25 whites along the way. South Carolina's Lieutenant Governor William Bull and four of his friends came across the group while on horseback. They left to warn other slaveholders. Rallying a militia of planters and slaveholders, the colonists traveled to confront Jemmy and his followers.

The next day, the well-armed and mounted militia, numbering 20–100 men,[citation needed] caught up with the group of 80 slaves at the Edisto River. In the ensuing confrontation, 20 whites and 44 slaves were killed. While the slaves lost, they killed proportionately more whites than was the case in later rebellions. The colonists mounted the severed heads of the rebels on stakes along major roadways to serve as warning for other slaves who might consider revolt.[6] The lieutenant governor hired Chickasaw and Catawba Indians and other slaves to track down and capture the slaves who had escaped from the battle.[7] A group of the slaves who escaped fought a pitched battle with a militia a week later approximately 30 miles (50 km) from the site of the first conflict.[4] The colonists executed most of the rebellious slaves; they sold other slaves off to the markets of the West Indies.

Aftermath
Over the next two years, slave uprisings occurred independently in Georgia and South Carolina, perhaps inspired, as colonial officials believed, by the Stono Rebellion. Conditions of slavery were sufficient cause. Planters decided they had to develop a slave population who were native-born, believing they were more content if they grew up enslaved. Attributing the rebellion to the recently imported Africans, planters decided to cut off the supply and enacted a 10-year moratorium on slave importation through Charleston. After they opened it up to international trade again, they imported slaves from areas other than the Congo-Angolan region.[8]

In addition, the legislature passed the Negro Act of 1740 to tighten controls: it required a ratio of one white to ten blacks on any plantation. It prohibited slaves from growing their own food, assembling in groups, earning money, or learning to read. In the uncertain world of the colony, several of the law's provisions were based on the assumption that whites could effectively judge black character; for instance, whites were empowered to examine blacks who were traveling outside a plantation without passes, and to take action.[9] The legislature also worked to improve conditions in slavery; it established penalties for masters who demanded excessive work or who brutally punished slaves (these provisions were difficult to enforce, as the law did not allow slave testimony against whites.) They also started a school to teach slaves Christian doctrine.[10] At the same time, the legislature tried to prevent slaves from being manumitted, as the representatives thought that the presence of free blacks in the colony made slaves restless. It required slaveholders to apply to the legislature for permission for each case of manumission, which had formerly been arranged privately. South Carolina kept these restrictions against manumission until slavery was abolished after the American Civil War.

The legislature's action related to manumissions likely reduced the chances that planters would free the mixed-race children born of their (or their sons') liaisons with enslaved women, as they did not want to subject their sexual lives to public scrutiny.[11] Such relationships continued, as documented in numerous sources. For instance, by 1860 the 200 students at Wilberforce University in Ohio, established for blacks, were mostly mixed-race children of wealthy southern planter fathers.[12]

Now named the Stono River Slave Rebellion Site, the Hutchinson's warehouse site where the revolt began was declared a National Historic Landmark in 1974.[13] A South Carolina Historical Marker has also been erected at the site.
 

J-Nice

A genius is the one most like himself
Supporter
Joined
Aug 5, 2013
Messages
3,630
Reputation
3,160
Daps
12,237
198_331.jpg


In 1490, an African guard, Sidi Badr, seized power in Bengal and ruled for three years before being murdered. Five thousand of the 30,000 men in his army were Ethiopians. After Sidi Badr’s assassination, high-level Africans were driven out and migrated to Gujarat and the Deccan. In the Deccan sultanate of Bijapur, Africans formerly enslaved—they were called the “Abyssinian party”—took control. The African regent Dilawar Khan exercised power from 1580 and was succeeded by Ikhlas Khan. The Abyssinian party dominated the Bijapur Sultanate and conquered new territories until the Mughal invasion in 1686.
 

J-Nice

A genius is the one most like himself
Supporter
Joined
Aug 5, 2013
Messages
3,630
Reputation
3,160
Daps
12,237
razia.jpeg

Jamal-ud-Din Yaqut

Jamal-ud-Din Yaqut (also Jamaluddin Yakut) was an African Siddi slave-turned-nobleman who was a close confidante of Razia Sultana, the first female monarch of the Delhi Sultanate in India, and who is speculated to have been her lover. Razia Sultana's patronage made him an influential member of the court, provoking racial antagonism amongst the nobles and clergy, who were both primarily Turkish and already resentful of the rule of a female monarch.

Ethnic background

Jamal-ud-Din Yaqut lived during the time of the Sultan Iltutmish and then Razia Sultan, sometime from 1200 to 1240 CE, when he was slain in a revolt against Razia Sultan.[1] Yaqut was a habshi. Habshi's were enslaved Africans of East African descent frequently employed by Muslim monarchs in India for their reputed physical prowess and loyalty and as such were an important part of the armies and administration of the Delhi Sultanate.

Biography

Yaqut rose in the ranks of the Delhi court, and found favour with the first female monarch of the Mamluk dynasty, Razia Sultana. Yaqut soon became a close advisor and was widely rumoured in the court and amongst the nobles to be the queen's lover. Contemporary historians were also conflicted in their assessment — many including Ibn Battuta record that their relationship was illicit and too intimate in public, but others assert that Yaqut was just a close advisor and friend. A particular incident that provoked the rumours was when Yaqut was observed sliding his arms under the queen's armpits to hoist her onto a horse, which was seen as a flagrant act of intimacy. His power and influence grew through his close relationship with Razia Sultana, who appointed him to the important post of superintendent of the royal stables, giving a loyalist an important post and challenging the power of the Muslim nobles and orthodox leaders. She awarded him the honorific title Amir-al-Khayl (Amir of Horses) and later the much higher Amir al-Umara (Amir of Amirs), much to the consternation and outrage of the Turkish nobility. Already resented for being a woman ruler by the Muslim nobles and clerics, Razia's proximity to an Abyssinian slave (considered racially inferior to the Turkish nobles who ruled the Sultanate) alienated the nobility and clerics and soon provoked open rebellion and conspiracy.

A rebellion led by Malik Altunia, the governor of Bhatinda (Punjab) broke out against Razia and Yaqut; fearing a siege, Razia and Yaqut chose to go out of Delhi to engage the rebels. Forces loyal to Razia and Yaqut were routed by Altunia; Yaqut was killed and Razia was imprisoned until she married Altunia; however, both Razia and Altunia were subsequently killed in battle against Razia's brother Bahram Shah, who had usurped the throne of Delhi in Razia's absence.

Modern influence

The speculated relationship between the slave Yaqut and the queen Razia has become famous and a part of folklore in India. The character of Jamal-ud-Din Yaqut was played by the Indian actor Dharmendra in the 1983 Hindi film Razia Sultan, whose plot was centred around the love story of Yaqut and Razia, who was portrayed by the actress Hema Malini.
 

CASHAPP

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Aug 12, 2012
Messages
26,392
Reputation
-2,494
Daps
48,120
@Marvel @2Quik4UHoes @Elle Driver I'm on Sankofa online store now and going through the books again and once again I'm looking at the "Stolen Legacy" book(btw if your ever at that store again try to ask if they could do their best to keep adding more books online for those who can't go to D.C. easily)

Anyway....I wanted to ask if "Stolen Legacy" is a good source of material to learn from.....are there books on there that you would say are what 2Quik usually refers to as things that make Afrocentric beliefs be so easily parodied sometimes? Like any Amos Wilson "Magic Negro baby" moments....or are most of the books pretty much reputable to look at
 

Marvel

Psalm 149:5-9
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
8,804
Reputation
813
Daps
15,171
Reppin
House of Yasharahla
@Marvel @2Quik4UHoes @Elle Driver I'm on Sankofa online store now and going through the books again and once again I'm looking at the "Stolen Legacy" book(btw if your ever at that store again try to ask if they could do their best to keep adding more books online for those who can't go to D.C. easily)

Anyway....I wanted to ask if "Stolen Legacy" is a good source of material to learn from.....are there books on there that you would say are what 2Quik usually refers to as things that make Afrocentric beliefs be so easily parodied sometimes? Like any Amos Wilson "Magic Negro baby" moments....or are most of the books pretty much reputable to look at

There are many books...what kind are you looking for? Social? Historical? Biographies?
 

CASHAPP

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Aug 12, 2012
Messages
26,392
Reputation
-2,494
Daps
48,120
There are many books...what kind are you looking for? Social? Historical? Biographies?

nothing specific really...as long as its gonna teach me more and more about our people's history...another member ages ago already recommended "King Leopold's Ghost" to me I think it was @Type Username Here and that would help because I was one of those who had limited history on what happened in the Congo until you guys mentioned him....

of course at the top of the list are the usual suspects I have been waiting to get for a while like Assata's biography

but if you have your own collection you would recommend that's good also....I think I need to focus more on social and historical though and not biographies as much like most people in general gravitate more towards....the former would teach me more than the latter
 

Marvel

Psalm 149:5-9
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
8,804
Reputation
813
Daps
15,171
Reppin
House of Yasharahla
nothing specific really...as long as its gonna teach me more and more about our people's history...another member ages ago already recommended "King Leopold's Ghost" to me I think it was @Type Username Here and that would help because I was one of those who had limited history on what happened in the Congo until you guys mentioned him....

of course at the top of the list are the usual suspects I have been waiting to get for a while like Assata's biography

but if you have your own collection you would recommend that's good also....I think I need to focus more on social and historical though and not biographies as much like most people in general gravitate more towards....the former would teach me more than the latter

I haven't read this yet but I heard its a must

 

2Quik4UHoes

Why you had to go?
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
63,424
Reputation
18,480
Daps
236,004
Reppin
Norfeast groovin…
@Marvel @2Quik4UHoes @Elle Driver I'm on Sankofa online store now and going through the books again and once again I'm looking at the "Stolen Legacy" book(btw if your ever at that store again try to ask if they could do their best to keep adding more books online for those who can't go to D.C. easily)

Anyway....I wanted to ask if "Stolen Legacy" is a good source of material to learn from.....are there books on there that you would say are what 2Quik usually refers to as things that make Afrocentric beliefs be so easily parodied sometimes? Like any Amos Wilson "Magic Negro baby" moments....or are most of the books pretty much reputable to look at

Usually, I check the reviews to see how I may like it. But in terms of books, its like I told you before breh it's al about the questions you got. Me, I got too many questions to answer so I just start slow and build up from that. I have lots of books I ain't read yet cuz I haven't had a chance to get to them. Here's how I've gone about it more recently tho, my amazon wish list is broken into categories and from there they break down into sub-categories according to the book(s). So since I don't know as much as I can know about Africa for instance, I focus on those books first and pick the top scholars and work my way down until it's more or less a useless book I don't need. I have a path I'm going on from Africa to Asia, Asia to either Europe or the Americas, then Australia to finish. Even with that I've barely scratched the surface of my amazon wishlist.

I don't use the wishlist just to buy books, but to read reviews and organize the questions I may have. Try to focus on one question at a time, and used books to knock them questions out gradually and before you know it you've answered your question and gained a bunch of extra knowledge you ain't even think of. I'll recommend some favorite books of mine:

Christopher Columbus & The Afrikan Holocaust by John Henrik Clarke
The Black Jacobins by C.L.R. James
African Civilization Revisited by Basil Davidson
Any book by Cheikh Anta Diop.

I'm reading Live from Death Row right now, that shyt is just :to: :snoop:

Edit: My bad I forgot, as far as Stolen Legacy goes that's your call breh. What's more important is what you take from it. Remember, just cuz it's in a book don't mean it's always 100. That's the fun tho, you get to figure out how true it may be. Just be mindful you know, knowledge is power but that power comes from your relationship with that knowledge.
 
Top