Israel–Hamas War: 10/7/2023 - Present

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
51,805
Reputation
7,926
Daps
148,724


TikTok Says It's Not the Algorithm, Teens Are Just Pro-Palestine​

In a blog post, the company denied allegations that it has been promoting pro-Palestine content in an effort to sway American opinion.

By Jules Roscoe
November 13, 2023, 3:23pm


1699906780434-gettyimages-1775223881.jpeg

IMAGE CREDIT: PACIFIC PRESS VIA GETTY IMAGES

TikTok has come under GOP fire in recent weeks after the app showed an apparent spike in pro-Palestine content after the IDF began its bombing campaign of Gaza following Hamas’s Oct. 7 attack. Republican politicians have publicly claimed that the company is intentionally promoting pro-Palestine content with the goal of “brainwashing our [American] youth” into supporting Hamas.


But the proliferation of pro-Palestine content on TikTok isn’t due to the app’s algorithm, the company stated in a press release on Monday. Rather, it claimed that teenagers simply tend to support Palestine more.
“Attitudes among young people skewed toward Palestine long before TikTok existed,” the release stated. “Support for Israel (as compared to sympathy for Palestine) has been lower among younger Americans for some time. This is evidenced by looking at Gallup polling data of millennials dating as far back as 2010, long before TikTok even existed.”

The data linked by the release states that sympathy toward Israel is “solidly positive” among older generations, but that millennials were “evenly divided,” with 42 percent sympathizing more with Palestine and 40 percent sympathizing more with Israel.

1699905968579-net-sympathy-for-israelis-in-middle-east-situation-by-generation.png

NET SYMPATHY FOR ISRAELIS IN MIDDLE EAST SITUATION, BY GENERATION. CREDIT: GALLUP.

TikTok admitted that the data in the poll covering Gen Z is slight. “There are too few adult members of Generation Z (aged 18-22) in the recent poll to report, but the limited available data suggests their views on this question are similar to millennials’,” the Gallup data states. Around three in four adult TikTok users are between the ages of 18 and 34.

In an essay penned for the Free Press, Representative Mike Gallagher of Wisconsin wrote that TikTok was “controlled by America’s foremost adversary, one that does not share our interests or our values: the Chinese Communist Party (CCP),” and that the “rampant pro-Hamas propaganda on the app should serve as a wake-up call to Americans” to ban it. (Congress has made efforts to ban TikTok before, and former president Donald Trump threatened on more than one occasion to do so. All attempts thus far have been unsuccessful.)

Gallagher wrote that promoting “pro-Hamas” content is something the CCP would do, because two Chinese web platforms that have mapping capabilities do not label Israel on their maps, and that this form of censorship should come as “no surprise.”

The company wrote in the release that its algorithm does not “take sides,” but operates in a positive feedback loop—the more of a certain type of content a user interacts with, the more of that type of content they will be shown.
“TikTok does not ‘promote’ one side of an issue over another,” the release read. “In the U.S., we have given our third-party Trusted Technology Provider access to TikTok source code to understand if the system is acting as TikTok intends…On TikTok, the videos people view, like, and share inform the recommendation algorithm about content they might find relevant. Using these signals, the recommendation algorithm creates a prediction score to rank videos to potentially recommend.” The effective thrust of TikTok’s blog post, then, is that young people are seeing more pro-Palestine content on the app because that’s what they’re engaging with.

The post also denied allegations that the company was intentionally boosting pro-Palestine hashtags to get more views.
“Blunt comparisons of hashtags is severely flawed and misrepresentative of the activity on TikTok,” the release stated. “Hashtags on the platform are created and added to videos by content creators, not TikTok. Millions of people in regions such as the Middle East and South East Asia account for a significant proportion of views on hashtags. Therefore, there’s more content with #freepalestine and #standwithpalestine and more overall views. It is easy to cherry pick hashtags to support a false narrative about the platform.”

The release also noted that simply counting the number of videos associated with a hashtag was not “sufficient context” for understanding the platform. Though the #standwithIsrael tag is associated with fewer videos than #freePalestine, the release said, it has 68 percent more views per video in the U.S.

Additionally, the release states, the #freePalestine tag is much older than #standwithIsrael. “Some hashtags are newer (e.g. #standwithIsrael) while others are more established (e.g. #freePalestine),” the release stated. “The vast majority (9 in 10) of videos tagged #standwithIsrael were posted in the last 30 days in the US. A difference in views and posts is expected.”

In a brief search of the top 20 videos under each tag, Motherboard found that the oldest video that appeared under #freepalestine was from September 20, 2022, while the oldest video that appeared under #standwithisrael was from October 8, 2023.

TikTok wrote in the post that it was “rapidly and robustly responding” to content surrounding the Israel-Hamas war, stating it had removed 925,000 videos “in the conflict region” which it deemed to violate its community guidelines, “including content promoting Hamas.” The post also stated that the company had hired moderators fluent in Hebrew and Arabic to help parse content related to the war. It noted that the app had seen a “spike” of fake accounts being created after the conflict began, which it was working to remove.

At time of writing, the #freepalestine tag has 25.5 billion views, and #standwithisrael has 440.4 million views.
 

Orbital-Fetus

cross that bridge
Supporter
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
40,288
Reputation
17,645
Daps
146,064
Reppin
Humanity
I wonder if sentiment amongst the youth has changed so much that it could affect military readiness. Other than recruiting that is. I mean to say; what if Marines get sent into Gaza and collectively decide that this doesn't feel right to them and simply refuse to fight? I know it seems like a far out possibility but if you asked me five years ago if there would be this kind of global public backlash against Israel I wouldn't have believed it either. We are at a tipping point and I could imagine GI's straight up just saying "No".

helmet
 

Jimmy from Linkedin

All Star
Supporter
Joined
Oct 10, 2017
Messages
2,307
Reputation
1,556
Daps
6,963
Reppin
Managing Director at Breh & Breh, Inc
I wonder if sentiment amongst the youth has changed so much that it could affect military readiness. Other than recruiting that is. I mean to say; what if Marines get sent into Gaza and collectively decide that this doesn't feel right to them and simply refuse to fight? I know it seems like a far out possibility but if you asked me five years ago if there would be this kind of global public backlash against Israel I wouldn't have believed it either. We are at a tipping point and I could imagine GI's straight up just saying "No".

helmet
I think we are seeing this the world over in general. "The kids these days" type stuff has been said all the way back to Socrates and Aristotle, if not further back, but last year or two years ago there was a series of vids on tiktok asking the troops why they joined the army. Most of the responses (from all folks of color) was either 1 (in hindsight) I don't know why 2 to get out of previous environment 3 to go to school for "free."

We are seeing it in Russia as well with a bunch of the youth surrendering or just being overall ill-equipped to fight. Propaganda aside we are also seeing it again in the general fitness of Americans. Why bother fighting? Isn't that what politics is for? Only boomers in their lead-water-brained minds want to fight. Otherwise it's a bunch of people who have been so disenfranchised economically that they think that wars aren't started and finished with paperwork.

It is scary to consider that indeed it is only those who are the most bloodthirsty of the human species will be the ones who will want to go on the offensive. I think generally the human species is prepared to fight on defense if it has to come to that. Otherwise.... :flabbynsick:
 

Orbital-Fetus

cross that bridge
Supporter
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
40,288
Reputation
17,645
Daps
146,064
Reppin
Humanity
Only boomers in their lead-water-brained minds want to fight.
Speaking as a gen x'er who lived the mid 70's - early 90's in the Bronx, boomers do not have a monopoly on lead headedness. I'm certain that I've lost some IQ points from exhaust alone before lead was taken out. I don't think it was in the paint we had but I wasn't on the paint chip tip as a kid anyway. The water in NYC is renowned worldwide but that exhaust is what probably did it to me once I hit ground level. Living high up probably helped too but then there was always planes just over head going to and fro Laguardia. Did jet fuel ever use lead? I'm sure they did.
 

Jimmy from Linkedin

All Star
Supporter
Joined
Oct 10, 2017
Messages
2,307
Reputation
1,556
Daps
6,963
Reppin
Managing Director at Breh & Breh, Inc
Speaking as a gen x'er who lived the mid 70's - early 90's in the Bronx, boomers do not have a monopoly on lead headedness. I'm certain that I've lost some IQ points from exhaust alone before lead was taken out. I don't think it was in the paint we had but I wasn't on the paint chip tip as a kid anyway. The water in NYC is renowned worldwide but that exhaust is what probably did it to me once I hit ground level. Living high up probably helped too but then there was always planes just over head going to and fro Laguardia. Did jet fuel ever use lead? I'm sure they did.

Separate from EPA’s endangerment finding, in support of the objective to remove lead from aviation gasoline, in early 2022, the FAA and industry announced the program “Eliminate Aviation Gasoline Lead Emissions” (EAGLE). This program aims to achieve a lead-free aviation system no later than 2030. The FAA has approved the use of a 100 Octane unleaded fuel (G100UL) that can be widely used by piston-engine fleet, that is not yet commercially available. The FAA has also approved for use a lower octane fuel (UL 94), currently available at approximately 35 airports in the U.S., and the FAA is working to expand and streamline the process for eligible aircraft to use this fuel. 
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
51,805
Reputation
7,926
Daps
148,724
Imagine wiping away a 12 year old boys entire family and then talking about they deserved it because "they didn't condemn Hamas". And then wonder why that same kid would go on to fight for Hamas :francis:

Israel are Hamas biggest recruiters:ufdup:

the fanatics on boths sides need each other, they've both taken part in silencing or killing moderates or leftists on their side.
 
Top