Just posting facts. Not taking a side
IF ZONE DEFENSES COME IN, STARS MAY GO OUT
The subject was defense in the NBA, and Michael Jordan was speaking, although more about offense, especially his. We know few defenses could do anything about that.
But there was one that might be bothersome, the zone defense. It was the topic du jour at last month's All-Star Game, and Jordan was making an impassioned plea before the competition committee that had gathered to consider rules changes to enliven the NBA game. Jordan spoke passionately. If teams were able to play zone defenses, he said, he never would have had the career he did.
So now, perhaps the Michael Jordan era finally is over. A select committee on rules recommended last week that the NBA eliminate illegal-defense guidelines, which effectively would allow teams to play any defense, including a zone. The proposals also include a defensive three-second rule to prevent teams from stationing a big center, like Dikembe Mutombo, at the basket all game.
Other recommendations: reducing from 10 seconds to eight seconds the time required for the ball to be advanced to the frontcourt, limiting fouls on incidental contact and allowing the ball to be touched while on the rim, as it is in international play. The league's board of governors is expected to endorse the recommendations in April and put them into use for next season.
But coaches such as Miami's Pat Riley, who long has relied on a two-man post-up game, say times are changing.
"I think the philosophy now is about versatility, quickness, mobility, stretching the game," Riley said. "The philosophy has transcended getting a big man.
"This is the game of the 21st Century."
All stanning, agendas, hate aside what exactly is the argument against a 6'9, 250, top 1% athlete with a top 1% IQ dominating an era without zones where he's as big as if not bigger than most bigs as far as weight? What exactly was the late 80s, early 90s NBA gonna do with a 6'10 guy with an automatic J all the way out to 30 feet who is also as big or bigger than most bigs as far as weight? KD isn't know as an athlete but how many guys during that time were more athletict than him...and how many were 6'10 without shoes? Handchecking would certianly have an impact (see:2005) however it didn't stop inferior players from putting up numbers...go check 6'5, 210, dominant in the post, Adrian Dantley's stats from the 80s and then tell me what Bron or KD wouldn't do.
The hardest part of discussions like these is you are comparing myths to men. We are comparing shyt we saw through rose colored glasses and some shyt many of us didn't even see to shyt we see with all the knowledge, understanding, and bitterness/agendas that come with being an adult. We all grew up on Mike, he was a living legend. Most of us didn't see his struggles or the league prior to his dominance. As kids, we took the likes of the Knicks, Pacers, Suns, Jazz seriously when in reality the likes of the pre-Kawhi Raptors or CP3 Clips were head and shoulders over those teams. I say that to say, Zeke, Lambeer and the other Pistons (or other old heads) didn't view Mike like we do. Not only did they not grow up on "Like Mike" commercials they were kicking his ass...he was little brother to them. No matter what you do, you will always be little brother to a big brother. So they may have kinda the opposite thing going on...difference of course being their basketball knowledge/experience shyts all over ours. That doesn't mean we can't disagree though.
Also there is the fundamental attribution error. Mike's getting his ass kicked by the Pistons and Celtics wasnt' a result of him not having heart or not being a winner, he just didn't have enough help. Conversely the 6 rings was the result of his indomininable will and GOATness and had nothing to do with expansion and having by far the best running mate and coach and amazing injury luck. I understand this thought process all too well, because I used to have it. Mike is better than Bron and KD, as an individual basketball player....he also had it better than them in regards to things outside of his control during his prime. The latter doesn't take away from the former and if you think it does, maybe thou art protesting too much and you aren't as sold on MJ being GOAT as you say.