Is Star Wars Attack Of The Clones unfairly hated on because of how trash Episode I was?
- Thread starter Combat Carl
- Start date
Combat Carl
Yeah n!gga
So you'd rather watch two hours of Jar Jar Binks shucking and jiving and farting over the creation of the Clone Army and, Anakin slaughtering the sand people, and Mace Windu morphing into Jules Winfield?
Attack of the Clones is the worst fukking one.
Revenge of the Sith at least had a cool premise and story but it still has the terrible dialogue, wooden acting and just overall shytiness that plagued the rest of the prequel trilogy.
TheGodling
Los Ingobernables de Sala de Cine
A better question would be if Revenge Of The Sith is undeservedly overrated because of how trash the first two episodes were, because it is.
Combat Carl
Yeah n!gga
That movie would of still been great if it was a stand alone film.
So you'd rather watch two hours of Jar Jar Binks shucking and jiving and farting over the creation of the Clone Army and, Anakin slaughtering the sand people, and Mace Windu morphing into Jules Winfield?
I don't see myself having any desire to watch either of those first two prequel movies ever again. 3-4 cool scenes (which both of them have) do not make up for the remaining 2 hours and 15 minutes of
Attack Of The Clones suffers from wooden acting. Natalie Portman and Hayden Christensen both really suffered from the bad dialogue.
Revenge Of The Sith is ok, DESPITE the bad dialogue Natalie and Hayden tried their bests
Revenge Of The Sith is ok, DESPITE the bad dialogue Natalie and Hayden tried their bests
Looking back, this film was NOT as bad as alot of brehs made it out to be. The lightsaber duels were on point and the end battle scene was pretty well done as well. Of course the obvious flaw of the film was George Lucas' trash writing skills with Anakin and Padme's boring ass love story and wooden acting.
I just feel that brehs really didnt give the film a chance because of how utterly
AOTC was a solid 6/10 film to me
Real talk, the original Star Wars trilogy may be iconic, but the prequel Trilogy is better. Episode III is the best movie of the entire series.
Last edited:
#2 is one of the worst movies EVER made. #3 has to be ATLEAST the second best in the trilogy. They really needed someone like han to swag out though.
Whoa whoa..never ever ever heard anything like this so I'm not going to flame you or any immature shyt like that, I'm interested in your opinion breh...
Combat Carl
Yeah n!gga
They basically should of just started the trilogy with Attack of the Clones, had the middle film be all of that Clone Wars shyt that they have shoved down our throats for the past six years, and had Revenge of the Sith the last film.
Sonny Corinthos
Superstar
Man ROTS is that unadulterated puff tho, I'll never forget seeing that shyt in the theater good memories
Attack of the Clones is good but forgettable as hell, I honestly start my Star Wars viewing with Sith and forget the other two prequel joints, however if I was bored one day and it was on TNT id watch it
Attack of the Clones is good but forgettable as hell, I honestly start my Star Wars viewing with Sith and forget the other two prequel joints, however if I was bored one day and it was on TNT id watch it
The prequels never bothered me...
same but i was never a star wars nerd
i remember seeing episode 1 in the theatre as a little kid, and i enjoyed myself even though I had no idea the premises of the story etc.
Episode I is 
WTF were they thinking bad
Episode II is just bad
Episode III is very good
I went through all six films recently with RiffTrax. Had forgotten basically everything about Episode I & II. Their reputations are well-deserved. Acting is atrocious, casting choices are just as bad.
WTF were they thinking badEpisode II is just bad
Episode III is very good
I went through all six films recently with RiffTrax. Had forgotten basically everything about Episode I & II. Their reputations are well-deserved. Acting is atrocious, casting choices are just as bad.
