Is California as expensive as people say it is?
- Thread starter AntiHero
- Start date
The "scenery" in downtown Atlanta is about as basic as you can get...
and theres this...
but but but
So SF's quality of life is greater AND it's falling at the same time?
schedule an appointment at the center for disease control, i think you have meningitis
West Coast Avenger
West Coastin & Smokin
but but but
So SF's quality of life is greater AND it's falling at the same time?
schedule an appointment at the center for disease control, i think you have meningitis
Notice the negative 5 arrow while Atlanta has improved on this index for the past few years. The South is underdeveloped, while San Fran is as developed as it can be. San Fran is stagnate and Atlanta will surpass it in no less than 10 years.
Ultimate Warrior
All Star
***snorts 99seconds ***
Entire westcoast is expensive, example the new develop area where I stay
300k-600k
asking price, if you a first home buyer it gets a lil better
apartments 1 bedroom in my area 725 utilities included, thats at one of places i wanted to goto 1nce i saw the size of it, thought fukk it i could come out cheaper just getting a house and sign up for homeshield fukk a maintanace man.
The south is way cheaper. But I rather deal with west coast/pacific nw weather vs the emotional weather in the south, 1 tornado was enough for me
Entire westcoast is expensive, example the new develop area where I stay
300k-600k
asking price, if you a first home buyer it gets a lil better
apartments 1 bedroom in my area 725 utilities included, thats at one of places i wanted to goto 1nce i saw the size of it, thought fukk it i could come out cheaper just getting a house and sign up for homeshield fukk a maintanace man.
The south is way cheaper. But I rather deal with west coast/pacific nw weather vs the emotional weather in the south, 1 tornado was enough for me
Tommy Knocks
retired
I'm sorry but there is no comparing SF to ATL. ATL might have rich old history, but SF is the most progressive liberal and open minded city in America. It's an artists haven, with fantastic scenery. The vibe of the people, weather, scenery, mentality, culture is well worth the price. ATL I found a lot of segregation, but in SF, the weirder you look the more popular you are. It's crazy how open minded those people were.
dabestkeptsecret
Superstar
@ CDC, might as well have mentioned how its delta's biggest airport hub at how this thread turned into ATL vs San FranAt this point in my life i'd prob live in atl over san fran for the better nightlife and the chicks
San fran may have higher rated restaurants but that southern cooking in atl is too
I guess san fran would be appealing if you're involved with technology, need good public transportation, and like being on the water.
had no idea a good apt in san diego was around 1200.
I'm paying way more out here in dc
Last edited:
That's not open-minded it called hobo-chic, trust fund, neo-liberal yuppies living on daddies money in a playground for rich people. It's what NYC is turning into and the reason I left. Ironically, there are tons of San Fran kids moving to NYC and I don't think that it's a coincidence. San Fran hasn't produced anything of artistic significance in ages. Like I said, San Fran is in it's twilight years and will continue to stagnate as there isn't much more growth for that city, while the South, specifically Atlanta, has tons of growth to do, especially once the region turns Blue.
Notice the negative 5 arrow while Atlanta has improved on this index for the past few years. The South is underdeveloped, while San Fran is as developed as it can be. San Fran is stagnate and Atlanta will surpass it in no less than 10 years.
lmao this is what you've been saying in this thread
atlanta is better than san francisco
BUT
san francisco has a higher quality of life
AND
atlanta needs 10 years to catch up to san francisco's level
do you see how idiotic everything you've said in here is? #centerfordiseasecontrol
but yea SF is 100% developed and nothing will improve ever again. there are over 40 construction developments underway but uoenoit
new skyscrapers under construction:
proposed downtown SF arena for the Golden State Warriors:
meanwhile in atlanta:
Tommy Knocks
retired
The fact that it's still growing and the fact that SF is already grown, should tell you something. I don't know what the future holds but I'm talking about right now.
And I'm not goin to speak on SF art, I'll just let you look that up yourself.
btw. trust fund, neo-liberals yuppies are open minded, yes. so are the other folks living in the city. The point is, they are open minded. I dont know what your beef is with trust fund kids and yuppies and hipsters but I dont have one.
And yet, it has fallen down the list of great cities for the past few years...
Rich technocratic fantasies proposed by San Fran billionaires doesn't mean it will happen. Tons of industry is moving to Atlanta just because it's significantly cheaper. It's already set in motion. Keep living out that twilight.
They are parasites. Read up on the New York gentrification thread if you need to be clued in on how these maggots destroy art, history, working classes, etc
Rich technocratic fantasies proposed by San Fran billionaires doesn't mean it will happen. Tons of industry is moving to Atlanta just because it's significantly cheaper. It's already set in motion. Keep living out that twilight.
They are parasites. Read up on the New York gentrification thread if you need to be clued in on how these maggots destroy art, history, working classes, etc
Notice the negative 5 arrow while Atlanta has improved on this index for the past few years. The South is underdeveloped, while San Fran is as developed as it can be. San Fran is stagnate and Atlanta will surpass it in no less than 10 years.