Those shows stay true to their worlds & environments. BB crossed over that bridge at some point.
Nothing difficult about writing that story tidbit about the teddy bear falling out of the sky. They justed introduced a piece of the ending at the beginning of the season. Only the audience is in the blind about the meaning and are wowed by the revelation later. The story itself was fine though. But how are you comparing a single scene to a whole season story arc?
If the premise is a school teacher becomes a drug lord, what bridge did they cross over? The show wasn't realistic from day 1. Season 5 of "The Wire" crossed a bridge with that serial killer shyt, and that's a show that's supposed to be real.
And actually they had the end of the season in mind before they wrote one scene of that season. They literally constructed the entire season around the image of a pink teddy bear falling out of the sky. It's the only season they "wrote backwards". Why? They just wanted to be creative. In hindsight it's easy to say "well, that doesn't sound impressive" because we see the finished product.
A show like "The Wire" never has to do anything like that. And I didn't mean to compare an arc to one scene, I'm saying there's no reason for "The Wire" or "Mad Men" to think outside of the box for anything because they strive for realism. They never have to say "ok, let's disassemble Etch-A-Sketches and make thermite" or "let's build a battery out of nuts and blots because we're stuck in the desert". Both of which ironically are completely realistic situations and 100% scientifically accurate.
I love both shows I just don't understand awarding points for realism.
Fred.