Its no leadership issue. We need to stop say it isIt very apparent that the lack of leadership was the biggest weakness of BLM. 6-7years of nothing. No legislation, no policy, not even a simple charity program. We had the whole world marching for us only for it to be subverted by anarchists and class reductionists. Yanking down Ulysses S. Grant statue proved that this is no longer about black issues. Just class and the right symbolism. This movement has died and morphed into occupy wallstreet pt.2
The issue is not a "lack of leadership." While several national figureheads pushing the agenda across the board would definitely help to publicize and keep the messaging consistent - that is not the issue.It very apparent that the lack of leadership was the biggest weakness of BLM. 6-7years of nothing. No legislation, no policy, not even a simple charity program. We had the whole world marching for us only for it to be subverted by anarchists and class reductionists. Yanking down Ulysses S. Grant statue proved that this is no longer about black issues. Just class and the right symbolism. This movement has died and morphed into occupy wallstreet pt.2
This is just untrue. Openly a lie. Ferguson wasn't even the largest of the uprisings at that time - but I've been seeing more and more people use it to try and attack Black Lives Matter.Its no leadership issue. We need to stop say it is
BLM was frauds since day one. They came to Ferguson and co opted those black people movement in that area
The issue is not a "lack of leadership." While several national figureheads pushing the agenda across the board would definitely help to publicize and keep the messaging consistent - that is not the issue.
There has been plenty of legislation - opened federal and state investigations - the inclusion of "liberal" piecemeal policies on local and state levels has been helpful.
What exactly did you expect the movement and the organization associated with it to do? The issue with criticising the movement and organization is that those who are doing the criticism don't have an inkling of what is "necessary" so they wax poetic. The movements were not "subverted" by anarchists and class reductionists. You'd have to be an avid subscriber to Fox News and Breitbart to believe that load of pure, uncut bullshyt.
The movement was a series of uprisings concerning systemic anti-Black racism. There is no straightforward path to ending that. Especially not with moderate politicians too scared to do anything - and right-wing politicians mobilizing to stop any progress.
The movement is composed of Black people nationwide - and right now the push is for the abolition of the police, prisons, and the redirecting of funds into the social services vital to the communities that are being overpoliced. I know full well you, just like virtually everybody else, would have claimed that was lunacy 2 years ago - yet it is gaining massive traction and budget cuts are already being instituted.
.
You're looking at media representations and mistaking them for BLM -specific statements.Lack of leadership is a main issue dude. BLM doesn't even know how to define itself, one week its advocating for LGBT, then women, anticapitalism, POC, Black and Brown, BIPOC(where did this term even come from?) and then Black people. The phrase "Black Lives Matter" already encompasses women and LGBT, there doesn't need to be further division as it takes away from the main focus. Theyre also so obsessed with "allies" that no ground rules are gone over with them and they tend to tag it up with their own shyt. Allies are suppose to be there for support because they believe what's happening is truly wrong, not to plug their issues or ideals into our movement. Not only that, like I said before BLM has been around for 7 years with no significant goals accomplished. No pictures of events, no breakdown of their funds, no viewable organizational board, and they only started "verifying" chapters the last month or so which still hasn't stopped randoms from making their own marches. The BLM movement is always going to be tied to the BLM org, there no way to separate the two unless BLM org renames itself. Colin Kaepericks org has done way more in less time and has the proof to show it. Look at his site and BLM, you can see the difference clear as day
The movement is suppose to have clear concise goals and a path to get there through legislation lobbying etc. "Defund the Police" was a random phrase that somehow globbed together a shaky platform that I doubt most cities will support in its current state despite you saying so. What social programs will the funds go to? Do new social programs need to be made? Will the funding be yearly? How will we measure the results to make sure it's working? I have not seen these questions answered by the Defund platform. There needs to be radical criminal justice reform but BLM wants everything tied to the police which is frustrating. Plenty of things can be its own separate issue. You have to be strategic with voters.
You are right, there is not a straight forward path to end systemic racism, but we can push for legislation for our best interest like everyone else does. BLM doesn't seem to know how to do that.
You're looking at media representations and mistaking them for BLM -specific statements.
Check the national-website - it is an organization for the rights of "all" Black people - and that includes Black women, Black LGBT people, and poor Black people.
You can't run a proper rights organization without being anti-capitalist. And too many chauvinists have tried to make the organization about Black men only - you can see it right here on this site - knee-jerk reactions of anyone supports Black LGBT people, or Black women.
Allyship is a necessity - we're a small group in the US. Do you think Israel is empowered just by Jewish people - or is its Evangelical Christian allyship the bulk of the funding?
Again, literally just check out the site.
Police abolition and prison abolition have been a part of the movement for years - they just reached mainstream support at the same time. And I'm not here to cry and "doubt" my nikka - I'm here to work until the change actually comes. And this is a movement, and an organization - its not an electoral body - "voters" are not the main focus.
Agent.The issue is not a "lack of leadership." While several national figureheads pushing the agenda across the board would definitely help to publicize and keep the messaging consistent - that is not the issue.
There has been plenty of legislation - opened federal and state investigations - the inclusion of "liberal" piecemeal policies on local and state levels has been helpful.
What exactly did you expect the movement and the organization associated with it to do? The issue with criticising the movement and organization is that those who are doing the criticism don't have an inkling of what is "necessary" so they wax poetic. The movements were not "subverted" by anarchists and class reductionists. You'd have to be an avid subscriber to Fox News and Breitbart to believe that load of pure, uncut bullshyt.
The movement was a series of uprisings concerning systemic anti-Black racism. There is no straightforward path to ending that. Especially not with moderate politicians too scared to do anything - and right-wing politicians mobilizing to stop any progress.
The movement is composed of Black people nationwide - and right now the push is for the abolition of the police, prisons, and the redirecting of funds into the social services vital to the communities that are being overpoliced. I know full well you, just like virtually everybody else, would have claimed that was lunacy 2 years ago - yet it is gaining massive traction and budget cuts are already being instituted.
This is just untrue. Openly a lie. Ferguson wasn't even the largest of the uprisings at that time - but I've been seeing more and more people use it to try and attack Black Lives Matter.
Check out "From #BlackLivesMatter to Black Liberation" by. Keeanga Yahmatta-Taylor.
The issue is not a "lack of leadership." While several national figureheads pushing the agenda across the board would definitely help to publicize and keep the messaging consistent - that is not the issue.
There has been plenty of legislation - opened federal and state investigations - the inclusion of "liberal" piecemeal policies on local and state levels has been helpful.
What exactly did you expect the movement and the organization associated with it to do? The issue with criticising the movement and organization is that those who are doing the criticism don't have an inkling of what is "necessary" so they wax poetic. The movements were not "subverted" by anarchists and class reductionists. You'd have to be an avid subscriber to Fox News and Breitbart to believe that load of pure, uncut bullshyt.
The movement was a series of uprisings concerning systemic anti-Black racism. There is no straightforward path to ending that. Especially not with moderate politicians too scared to do anything - and right-wing politicians mobilizing to stop any progress.
The movement is composed of Black people nationwide - and right now the push is for the abolition of the police, prisons, and the redirecting of funds into the social services vital to the communities that are being overpoliced. I know full well you, just like virtually everybody else, would have claimed that was lunacy 2 years ago - yet it is gaining massive traction and budget cuts are already being instituted.
This is just untrue. Openly a lie. Ferguson wasn't even the largest of the uprisings at that time - but I've been seeing more and more people use it to try and attack Black Lives Matter.
Check out "From #BlackLivesMatter to Black Liberation" by. Keeanga Yahmatta-Taylor.