India may be renamed as Bharat in special session of Parliament on September 18.

Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
52,902
Reputation
23,506
Daps
247,496
Reppin
St louis
Y4ivqUn.gif

they should name it ShyitPalms.



UKVu0t8.gif
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,666
Daps
203,872
Reppin
the ether
:comeon:

Cmon breh.

The whole reason why there’s a billion and a half of them is because they exist in the Himalaya’s rain shadow. That, combined with a relatively flat landmass and year round warm weather makes for favorable crop growing conditions.


But you claimed that their 'favorable climate' is promising for them going forward. It's the opposite - they're going to collapse under their own weight and literally every aspect of global warming (higher temps, worse storms, more inconsistent rain, higher sea level) is already starting to fukk them over heavy.
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,666
Daps
203,872
Reppin
the ether
Bharat means India in hindi
Bharat was the original name


Original name of what? Bharat wasn't the name of the whole region, just a part. South Indians never called themselves "Bharat", neither did northeast Indians, neither did Muslims. It's only been used generally since 1950, while India had been used for far longer.
 

NoirDynosaur

Yurrrrrrrrrr
Joined
Jun 15, 2018
Messages
5,989
Reputation
2,137
Daps
20,215
Reppin
Planet Earth
probably the hindu name, india is some shyt the greeks came up with.

So where does the name ‘Bharat’ come from?​

The roots of “Bharat”, “Bharata”, or “Bharatvarsha” are traced back to Puranic literature, and to the epic Mahabharata. The Puranas describe Bharata as the land between the “sea in the south and the abode of snow in the north”.

Social scientist Catherine Clémentin-Ojha explained Bharata in the sense of a religious and socio-cultural entity, rather than a political or geographical one. ‘Bharata’ refers to the “supraregional and subcontinental territory where the Brahmanical system of society prevails”, Clémentin-Ojha wrote in her 2014 article, ‘India, that is Bharat…’: One Country, Two Names (South Asia Multidisciplinary Academic Journal).

Bharata is also the name of the ancient king of legend who was the ancestor of the Rig Vedic tribe of the Bharatas, and by extension, the progenitor of all peoples of the subcontinent.


Writing in January 1927, Jawaharlal Nehru alluded to the “fundamental unity of India” that has endured from “the remote past”: “a unity of a common faith and culture. India was Bharata, the holy land of the Hindus, and it is not without significance that the great places of Hindu pilgrimage are situated in the four corners of India — the extreme South overlooking Ceylon, the extreme West washed by the Arabian Sea, the East facing the Bay of Bengal and the North in the Himalayas.” (Selected Works Vol. 2)

By the time of the early Mughals (16th century), the name ‘Hindustan’ was used to describe the entire Indo-Gangetic plain. Historian Ian J Barrow in his article, ‘From Hindustan to India: Naming Change in Changing Names’ (Journal of South Asian Studies, 2003) wrote that “in the mid-to-late eighteenth century, Hindustan often referred to the territories of the Mughal emperor, which comprised much of South Asia”.

From the late 18th century onwards, British maps increasingly began to use the name ‘India’, and ‘Hindustan’ started to lose its association with all of South Asia. “Part of the appeal of the term India may have been its Graeco-Roman associations, its long history of use in Europe, and its adoption by scientific and bureaucratic organisations such as the Survey of India,” Barrow wrote.


“The adoption of India suggests how colonial nomenclature signalled changes in perspectives and helped to usher in an understanding of the subcontinent as a single, bounded and British political territory,” he added.

TLDR: India was a remixed version given by British colonizer. India is going back to their roots

 

daemonova

hit it, & I didn't go Erykah Badu crazy, #yallmad
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
43,825
Reputation
3,500
Daps
72,301
Many countries already have their own name that they use for internal use, ex:

China = Zhongguo
Japan = Nippon
Greece = Hellas
Finland = Suomi
Armenia = Hayastan
Egypt = Miṣr

Does this mean they will rename their country Bharat while retaining the English name of India for international use, or they will insist other countries to refer to them solely as Bharat like how Persia rename itself as Iran and Burma rename itself as Myanmar?
Germany = Deutschland
 

Low End Derrick

Veteran
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
16,739
Reputation
5,861
Daps
73,360
But you claimed that their 'favorable climate' is promising for them going forward. It's the opposite - they're going to collapse under their own weight and literally every aspect of global warming (higher temps, worse storms, more inconsistent rain, higher sea level) is already starting to fukk them over heavy.

Give a fukk about them going forward. :mjlol:I'm talking about the present. One of the reasons why they're productivity powerhouse now is due to their favorable climate.
 
Top