In your heart, in your SOUL, you know it should be Lesnar vs Bryan WM 31

[MushroomX]

If not Bryan, who? There is no clear concise name mentioned as of yet.

Won't be Roman Reigns If Cena keyfabe got fukked up that hard, no way you can put Roman Reigns as a challenger unless he beats Cena... The fans will cheer for Bryan heavily at WM. So no matter what Bryan WILL get a featured spot. The only logical one is Lesnar for the title, because you know how bad the crowd will heckle any match that won't have Bryan for the title when he is active. He is at the Stone Cold Prime level, he will be in the discussion and that's a fact.

 

[StatUS]

Bryan vs. Lesnar would be the deal if he comes back in time.

 

[MushroomX]

Bryan vs. Lesnar would be the deal if he comes back in time.

Oh he will be back in time, Daniel Bryan will be like any high performance athlete. He eats a high diet of proteins so his recovery will be faster. I said it before, but look at Bryan's body, he is yoked up severely like a pitbull.

 

[Maizeandbluekid]

I know WWE is insistent on pushing Roman Reigns for WrestleMania 31, but I just thought of something: since Brock Lesnar will most likely be the champion going into WM 31, only to drop it to someone... why not Daniel Bryan?

Because with Brock in the mix, in addition to Cena, Reigns, Batista when he returns & maybe even Orton (Wild Card is Cesaro), these are potential for multiple programs over the months from now till Mania. And you would have to think that Daniel Bryan is in that picture, as well. But since the fans love Bryan so much, and we never really got a chance to experience a full-blown length title run from him, let him take as much time as needed to recover from his injury. And if Bryan is going to be out longer, why not just shelve him for the rest of the year?

That way, at Royal Rumble, when it's so highly expected that Reigns will win it, out comes Daniel Bryan as a surprise entrant (#30 for obvious reasons), shocks everyone & wins the Rumble.

It sets up a true David and Goliath matchup for the main event of WrestleMania 31: Brock Lesnar, The Conqueror, The Beast Incarnate, The 1 in 21-1, puts the title on the line against the ultimate underdog and super fan favorite, Daniel Bryan. And if Bryan is the one Brock puts over at the end, it makes Bryan even more incredible, considering that he beat the guy that beat Triple H, beat John Cena, beat CM Punk, and ended The Streak en route to becoming champion.

And I know people will complain about Bryan winning the title at WM 2 years in a row, but didn't Austin do that? What about Cena, Taker? And don't even get me started on Hogan. Plus, it also shows how much WWE is investing in and on Daniel Bryan to get him another chance to run with the ball as THE top guy in wrestling not named Cena.

As for looking for an opponent for Reigns... why not John Cena himself? I think it's more likely Cena puts over Reigns than he would have done for Wyatt, especially if Reigns is still babyface by then.

 

[BodeineBrazy]

Dude tried to say Bryan was never as over as HBK or Hart when he had fans actively shytting on the ROYAL RUMBLE purely because he wasn't in it. Then had fans hijack main event segments until he was in the ME of Wrestlemania. Hell, Bryan is so over his wife was in the second main event of SUMMERSLAM. Trolls don't even try to hide the fact that they're trolls on this site. Just embarrassing.

yo im reading this shyt like dudes cant seriously believe what they are writing. Dude is clear cut the most over wrestler in the world right now.

I ask this... who is more over than D Bry right now?

 

[Tha_Mac]

In all honesty I think WWE booked themselves into a corner they way they had Brock beat Cena. That was way too dominating and imo there's is ABSOLUTELY nobody who can beat him. Daniel Bryan is not the guy to knockoff Brock, neither is Roman Reigns. I think Cena is the only guy who can defeat Brock by redeeming himself ala the Rock at WM 28 & 29.

 

[dh86]

In all honesty I think WWE booked themselves into a corner they way they had Brock beat Cena. That was way too dominating and imo there's is ABSOLUTELY nobody who can beat him. Daniel Bryan is not the guy to knockoff Brock, neither is Roman Reigns. I think Cena is the only guy who can defeat Brock by redeeming himself ala the Rock at WM 28 & 29.

Daniel Bryan is the best wrestler there is, if he can't have a match realistically beating Brock, then no one in the company can.

 

[Tha_Mac]

Daniel Bryan is the best wrestler there is, if he can't have a match realistically beating Brock, then no one in the company can.

I agree Dbry is the best wrestler but the way Brock took Cena out there's no one who should beat Brock. Like I said WWE went overboard with the way he beat Cena. There's no way that Bryan can stand up to THAT type of beating.

 

[FBGPlank]

i wouldn't be mad if it was bryan , if he's down with brock winning

 

[Spiritual Stratocaster]

As a Daniel Bryan fan...I'd rather Bryan beat Brock than fukking Roman Reigns...the thought of Brock losing to a fukking spear??

However I think Brock should demolish Bryan,mainly because it keeps Brock solidified as a true beast destroying everyone on the roster.

He'll probably end up losing to Cena, or Batista though.

 

[R=G]

If the payoff is Cena beating Brock in 3 years? Then Lesnar was a huge waste of time. Cena is an abomination at this point. No one wants to see him face Reigns or Batista again.

 

[dh86]

Mania is the last match of brocks contract. Want him retiring as champ?

 

[GoddamnyamanProf]

Just because you ARE a character... doesn't mean you HAVE character.

Yeah I know. Apply that to my previous statement if it helps you; its still true.

 

[GoddamnyamanProf]

In all honesty I think WWE booked themselves into a corner they way they had Brock beat Cena. That was way too dominating and imo there's is ABSOLUTELY nobody who can beat him. Daniel Bryan is not the guy to knockoff Brock, neither is Roman Reigns. I think Cena is the only guy who can defeat Brock by redeeming himself ala the Rock at WM 28 & 29.

Thinking like this never makes any sense.

First, it assumes that you buy into the WWE's kool aid that Cena is the best. "If Cena cant do it no one can! " Not only is Bryan a better wrestler than Cena but even in terms of kayfabe he also beat him for the title already, clean(!) After Warrior beat Hogan, should Warrior have never lost again since anyone being better than Hulk was impossible?

But the biggest issue is that this thinking is predicated on your opinion that its not believable or realistic, when the fact is that real sporting contests have upsets all the time, a hell of a lot more often than in WWE. Just because guy A beats guy B, that doesnt mean guy C cant lose to B and beat A. The Spurs can beat the Heat on Sunday, then turn around and get blown out by the Bucks two days later.

 

[Killer Instinct]

Who they choose to dethrone Lesnar, I don't know.
However, they really, really should be careful to not fukk this up.
A rub from Lesnar at this point will be - and is - a career maker if they choose the right guy.