Edit: This was redundant, so I'm removing my own video.
Last edited:
Literally every point you made here is false.
1. Stop trying to avoid what I have already presented and trying to move on. I'll get to this video, but only after you have provided me with a model that explains the phenomenon we see in reality, i.e., seasons, day night cycle, 24 hours of night/day in Antarctic and Arctic, etc.
2. You don't know what a sidereal day and solar day are. Multiple people in the thread (including me) have showed you that you don't know the difference between these two concepts. You confuse a sidereal day with a solar day. You are just repeating already debunked Flerf talking points.
3. This is gibberish. You don't even know what you're trying to say. Planes continue to retain the momentum imparted upon them by the spin of the Earth. This is baby's first physics lesson:
Inertial frame of reference - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
4. Here is water curving:
5. I'll do you one better-- here is an image and video of water AS A BALL, which is also evidence of water curving:
6. Theories are how facts are explained, genius. You don't know what words mean.
Dictionary.com | Meanings & Definitions of English Words
The world's leading online dictionary: English definitions, synonyms, word origins, example sentences, word games, and more. A trusted authority for 25+ years!www.dictionary.com
7. You haven't posted a SINGLE item that debunks the Heliocentric model. It is embarrassing that you believe you have.
And finally, you have NOT explained the seasons. Just saying something is not an explanation-- YOU NEED TO PROVIDE EVIDENCE OF THAT ASSERTION.
This requires a testable model. This is why we keep asking you for a model. In order for a statement about nature to have any power, it must come with a model that can be tested. You admit your model doesn't exist, therefore YOU HAVE NOT EXPLAINED THE SEASONS
You at best have a hypothesis, but one that is easily disproved by observation and math.
Again, you're nitpicking. Ngt described the earth like this, not to idiots, to other intellectualsAnother basket of bullshyt and lies.
YOU SAID NASA OFFICIALLY STATED THAT WAS THE SHAPE OF THE EARTH. Stop fukking lying.
Give me a link of NASA referring to the Earth in the way Neil did.
Neil is literally the first and only human that has referred to the Earth as "pear-shaped", because he is a science communicator, and is trying to dumb it down for speds like you that can't understand basic things like what an oblate spheroid is.
Everyone to say it after him is repeating what he said because it's a good approximation and visual for the lay person.
Every other institution of science refers to it as an oblate spheroid. It's sad that you don't understand the dumbed down version.
And the crescent moon photo was a photo of a crescent moon. The Moon moves, you idiot-- by the time it's a waxing crescent, it has MOVED. It is NOT the same thing or even the same position as a New Moon, because if it was IT WOULD BE A NEW MOON.
Jesus.
You're definitely never getting to that video because you know you have no answer for it
YOU dont understand the difference between a sidereal and solar day. Im not confusing them. Im saying that they are 2 different lengths of time, so they will quickly cause a time disparity, over time. You posted my quote explaining this but instead of focusing on the math in that quote, you tried to nitpick the definitions, which is weird
A sidereal day has nothing to do with the amount of time we should have left over. It is literally the way in which astronomers locate objects in the sky.
"Time" is the solar day. Minutes, hours, seconds are all based on the SOLAR DAY. If we DID have 120 minutes left over, it would be because the solar day is out of whack. It has nothing to do with a sidereal day bruh, which I remind you is about the amount of time it takes the meridian to pass through the vernal equinox.
You really just posted a wave as an example of water "curving". Its disingenuous stuff like this that makes me want to stop responding to you because you know that was a ridiculous response from you
Show me a body of water that is AT REST, curving
Im ready for the plane discussion whenever you are because what you just posted is absolutely wrong on multiple levels
And again, i asked you to post an example of water curving around a ball and you tried that "well in space you can" deflection already. You posted a water ball. Thats not what i asked you for. I asked you to post an example of water sticking to an object and curving around said object. Once again, AT REST. I know that balls of water can exist, theyre called water bubbles
I have explained the seasons. I also produced video evidence of 24 hour days and 24 hour nights at certain positions on earth, which the heliocentric model cannot explain
The heliocentric model also does not explain why the constellations have remained mostly fixed over multiple centuries, even while the earth is supposedly moving in multiple different directions at very high speeds
You keep asking me for "testable models" yet you arent producing any testable models yourself.
How do i "test" that the solar system is moving a million miles per hour in one direction??
How do i "test" that water can stick to a ball if, according to you, i have to go to "space" to do so?
How can i "test" that mars is a solid object?
Its hypocritical of you to ask for things that you cannot provide and have not provided
This is what the shape of the earth is. He used the exact same terminology as nasa, he just went into more detail. None of the spheres you posted look anything at all like an oblate spheroid. Im not sure why you're still harping on this point. You are absolutely wrong here
I know the new moon is in a different positon. Once again, that photo was to give context to my point, that a new moon is ALSO IN FRONT OF THE SUN, LIKE A SOLAR ECLIPSE IS, YET TWO DIFFERENT THINGS OCCUR. Why do you keep tslking around my main points just to nitpick? Why cant you stay on topic?
Solar eclipses occur during the day
New moons occur during the night
The sun, moon and earth are in the exact same position in both instances, yet it's daytime for one and nighttime for the other
The images that you posted literally show this
You are confused and trying to obfuscate what we are talking about because you are confused.
New moons do NOT only occur during night. Solar eclipses ONLY happen during New Moons, meaning new moons do not occur during the night. You're debunking your own talking point but you're not perceptive enough to realize that
New moons do NOT occur at night. I have no idea where you're getting this from.
You're slipping
The image i posted is of a new moon
This nikka acting like they don't have Asian supermarkets in every major city in AmericaBreh, this is a common pear in Asia. It literally appears across China, Korea and Japan, a combined population of 1.6 billion people.
Just because YOU are under-educated and don't know something exists doesn't mean others don't. A brilliant man like Neil would know of this fruit, especially if I knew about it.
And further, your response to being disproven about the pear thing is, "haha, you googled that"?
fukking embarrassing.
I told that nikka I looked out a telescope as a kid and saw that Mars was round and he basically said don't believe my lying eyes.This thread is back. We got tourists going to space and nikkas still dont believe.
Its like the articles that said after the airplane was invented many people still would not believe it happened.
This nikka acting like they don't have Asian supermarkets in every major city in America
Matter fact I had one a few weeks ago
So, crescent Moons are new moons on Flat Earth?
That's right up there with not knowing the difference between sidereal days and solar days.
Breh, I have literally seen you multiple times explain to this nikka the difference between a sidereal day and a solar day, and he STILL in here faking like we ain't beat him over the head with this shyt already.
I literally already explained it to breh. He's a fukking lie.