Im a get hate for this but fvck it. Batman aint no super hero. And his act is kinda lame.

Ethnic Vagina Finder

The Great Paper Chaser
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
55,153
Reputation
2,816
Daps
156,232
Reppin
North Jersey but I miss Cali :sadcam:
:ufdup:no you didnt say live action nothin, you said batman aint no superhero in the title and in the OP you said that batmans character was meant to be like the 50's show. Now, if you MEANT to say live action then we dont really disagree on anything

I said that's how the Adam West show was intended to be. Not to be taken seriously. The way they did the cartoons was in line with the comics but how every director has portrayed the character in movies has been ass. The lack of super powers limits what they can do IMO. I mean if they would've given him the intellect of Ozymandias from The Watchmen then they would have more to work with. It's like they keep having to use the same villians over and over again and then dumb them down just to be on Batman's level. The Joker was the only exception but how they found him was :mjpls: They even dumbed down Bane's character in the final act.
 

Ethnic Vagina Finder

The Great Paper Chaser
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
55,153
Reputation
2,816
Daps
156,232
Reppin
North Jersey but I miss Cali :sadcam:
Nolan's enemies weren't spot on either. The Joker was his own take. If anything, I felt Jack's joker felt more like the comic's than Ledger's joker. Still, Ledger's joker was great but let's not act like every live action hero was dead on.

And RDJ's Iron Man isn't spot on either. They had to reinvent the cartoon's character to fit more to the film character.


It's impossible to stick with the comics line for line but you have characters that allow you to be creative and you have characters that limit what you can expand on. Tony Stark's character has at least been consistent.



And for people saying they don't need to have an origins movie for Batman/Afleck....... Marvel did it with Hulk. They didn't do an origins movie but they at least made a sequel to link it to the Avengers team up.
 

MenacingMonk

Tranquilo
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
62,191
Reputation
7,938
Daps
135,677
Reppin
West where the Sunsets
You're still gonna watch Bat/Supes tho

shaq-laugh.gif


So by OP's logic Green Arrow, Hawkeye, Iron Man, Black Panther, Kingpin and Lex Luthor shouldn't be heroes/villains.
 

Ethnic Vagina Finder

The Great Paper Chaser
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
55,153
Reputation
2,816
Daps
156,232
Reppin
North Jersey but I miss Cali :sadcam:
You're still gonna watch Bat/Supes tho

shaq-laugh.gif


So by OP's logic Green Arrow, Hawkeye, Iron Man, Black Panther, Kingpin and Lex Luthor shouldn't be heroes/villains.


I'm watching cap. I aint fukking with another superman movie until the reboot the whole damn thing. Will probably never watch another batman movie again.

Hawkeye and Black widow aren't really portrayed has super heroes. They're shield agents. Lex Luther is just a criminal. Tony Stark is a genius the Iron Man suit makes him a super hero though.
 

Kartel13

All Star
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
3,742
Reputation
75
Daps
3,260
Reppin
NULL
was just agreeing with @Ethnic Vagina Finder that those villains did carry the films, i didnt say they were accurate

as for ironman they made changes but i guess that one is just my opinion that rdj is a much better tony/ironman than bale is a batman

bale is an alright wayne though, he did good on that side

Maybe it was Nolan's intentions to have the Villains carry the films? Batman has always been known to have a very unique set of Villains. Hell, his arch nemesis continues to come in at #1 on the greatest villains list.

And the difference between Iron Man and Batman is that Bruce Wayne/Batman are entirely 2 different characters. Bruce Wayne becomes a different monster with the costume on. Tony Stark doesn't. And RDJ's Iron Man is a little more RDJ than the actual representation of Tony Stark.
 

Kartel13

All Star
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
3,742
Reputation
75
Daps
3,260
Reppin
NULL
It's impossible to stick with the comics line for line but you have characters that allow you to be creative and you have characters that limit what you can expand on. Tony Stark's character has at least been consistent.



And for people saying they don't need to have an origins movie for Batman/Afleck....... Marvel did it with Hulk. They didn't do an origins movie but they at least made a sequel to link it to the Avengers team up.

Tony Stark has not been consistent. Watch the old Iron Man cartoons or read the old books and compare him today. They changed him to fit what we saw in the live action films. They only had to do that because Iron Man has now become a house hold name. Batman has always been there so of course they want to tinker with his character. Comic book writers as well as film makers will always bring their vision to the table.


And no, they don't need an orgins movie for Bats. The story has been told already. Why should DC follow Marvel's path? People have been dying for a Bats/Supes movie since we saw it in I Am Legend.
 

Ethnic Vagina Finder

The Great Paper Chaser
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
55,153
Reputation
2,816
Daps
156,232
Reppin
North Jersey but I miss Cali :sadcam:
Tony Stark has not been consistent. Watch the old Iron Man cartoons or read the old books and compare him today. They changed him to fit what we saw in the live action films. They only had to do that because Iron Man has now become a house hold name. Batman has always been there so of course they want to tinker with his character. Comic book writers as well as film makers will always bring their vision to the table.


And no, they don't need an orgins movie for Bats. The story has been told already. Why should DC follow Marvel's path? People have been dying for a Bats/Supes movie since we saw it in I Am Legend.

I said they were consistent as in his movie character has been consistent. Nobody follows the comic book to the T but Iron Man is dynamic enough to where you can be creative.

And yeah, nikkas dying for a batman vs. superman and they will be :dead: after they see that fukkery. I GUARANTEE It won't get above a 59% on RT. And when you write a totally new story line for a character you have to start over. Nolan's trilogy was polarizing so it's gonna be weird seeing a new batman unless he's just a supporting character with a limited role and they're only throwing the batman vs. superman title out there to sell tickets. Whatever the case may be, don't act like Superman won't dominate during his screen time.
 

Ethnic Vagina Finder

The Great Paper Chaser
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
55,153
Reputation
2,816
Daps
156,232
Reppin
North Jersey but I miss Cali :sadcam:
I mean this has basically turned into a costume contest. Who has the coolest contest. The dumb bytch is worrying about how batman has his lips :scusthov:

DC knows there are dumb fukks out there like this what will go see shyt movies as long as the costumes look cool.

 

Tikal

Coming thru like BLAOW
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
1,131
Reputation
390
Daps
2,259
Reppin
:ahh:
I dunno but with the Batman reboot they probably need to make Bruce intellect on a level of Tony stark or bruce banner if his gonna be fighting super powered villains.
 

Monoblock

Smoooth
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
30,479
Reputation
9,817
Daps
118,575
Reppin
Houston
Never mind the fact that he doesn't possess any super powers for a minute.

The show from the 50's was campy as hell and that's basically how his character was intended. Not to be taken seriously. Then when he hit the big screen they tried to make him more appealing by making him dark. Still no super powers and basically they relied on his costume, name and aura. From Batman in 1989 until Batman & Robin they kept having to reinvent his character. And once again with Nolan's trilogy they had to switch it up and give him new toys while making him even more dark to mask the fact that he's just a cac in a bat suite with a bunch of cool gadgets. I mean almost every batman movie that has come out has been carried by the villain. You don't really give a fukk about Bruce Wayne even though that's who he is most of the time. It's almost as if Bruce Wayne is filler. And despite not having super powers, he doesn't even have super traits. Tony Stark doesn't have super powers but he can make anything. He's a genius. Bruce Wayne needed help from Lucius and Alfred the entire time. He should've died in Batman Begins but Alfred saved him. He should've died in TDK but Gordon saved him. He should've died in TDKR but Ann Hathaway saved him. Now they gonna make him more muscular and dark for this Batman vs. Superman movie :mindblown: Batman is like rappers that get by because of "swag" once you strip that away and listen to the lyrics you got nothing.

The Batman cartoons were :blessed: but trying to translate that to live action is :snoop: when you don't have super powers. People who could realistically kill Batman on the big screen:

Hit Girl
Jack Bauer
Jason Bourne
Ethan Hunt
Black Widow
Snoop & Chris
Jonn McClain


I'm just in aw at how they have been able to feed people this character like he's this mythical super hero when he's just a regular guy that needs help from a lot of other people to get the job done. Hate if you must but I don't give a shyt
kag1S.gif
 
Top