careful with that hate-speech :jayfdup:Did they hack our voting systems yes or no?
cuck
and clearly i meant 'fukked with' as in, it actually had consequences. changed votes. im not impressed by this straw-grasping
careful with that hate-speech :jayfdup:Did they hack our voting systems yes or no?
cuck
So someone breaking into your home is okay as long as there weren't consequences?careful with that hate-speech :jayfdup:
and clearly i meant 'fukked with' as in, it actually had consequences. changed votes. im not impressed by this straw-grasping
it's not OK, but i sure couldn't put in a claim to the insurance companySo someone breaking into your home is okay as long as there weren't consequences?
Interesting perspective.
Would you call the police to report a break in?it's not OK, but i sure couldn't put in a claim to the insurance company
so go call the police and tell them nothing was stolenWould you call the police to report a break in?
Would you look around and see what was stolen?
Would you let your family know there was a break in?
Is breaking and entering only a crime of they steal something?so go call the police and tell them nothing was stolen
i think we're done here, pending better posting from you
when did i say you couldnt call the police? i said you couldnt call the insurance company to claim anything was stolen from you, and you started deflecting all over the place. no mention of why CNN hasn't called the police, just napoleon thread talking pointsYou see how this plays out don't you?
You, like Trump, are opposed to a normal response because you clearly have something to hide.
dawg, the article clearly states that it didnt happenYou see how this plays out don't you?
You, like Trump, are opposed to a normal response because you clearly have something to hide.
So by your logic, what about when America violently overthrows a democratically elected president in Iran? Or when we hack into other countries, also should i feel sympathy for clinton after she herself cheated? I could give a fukk about trump, theres a million other reasons he shouldnt be there but the dems are the ones only focused on the hardest one to prove for a reason. they agree with him on most of the shyt he does.
They actually hacked it.dawg, the article clearly states that it didnt happen
i see what you mean, but it couldnt possible have an effect on the election if nothing happened.
the US has to tighten up on security in the future.
but as far as 2016 goes, no impact was made
That shyt aint right either and those countries have the right to pull up..So by your logic, what about when America violently overthrows a democratically elected president in Iran? Or when we hack into other countries, also should i feel sympathy for clinton after she herself cheated? I could give a fukk about trump, theres a million other reasons he shouldnt be there but the dems are the ones only focused on the hardest one to prove for a reason. they agree with him on most of the shyt he does.
Dems believe in supporting the military industrial complexyup. well maybe not most, but more that they want to admit
dems agree with wall street deregulation
dems agreed wuth bombing syria
dems disproportionately side with israel
dems support dictatorial regimes like saudi arabia, but turn and act like they care about humanitarianism
dems and repubs both agree that big money influence in politics is okay
And who is the insurance company in your analogy..when did i say you couldnt call the police? i said you couldnt call the insurance company to claim anything was stolen from you, and you started deflecting all over the place. no mention of why CNN hasn't called the police, just napoleon thread talking points
i think you guys believe that thread is a lot more important than it actually is