11:00 mark he says Jeff Weaver was on his show (the premium channel) and in the 13th minute he says Bernie will be on his show.
And really Sam Seder and Michael Brooks always got Jimmy on the brain because I think they are jealous he has more subscribers than them. lol Jimmy has never mentioned them on his show once.
Nah I'm not doubting he got them on his channel but before he got them he was bytching. And nah that ain't the reason. Jimmy be acting real fishy sometimes. Entertaining that Caitlin Johnstone clown on his channel. Sometimes the way he covers certain shyt comes across like he's trying to be "fair" and get conservative types to view his channel. Uselessly contrarian. Some of the fire he has towards Democrats is not translated to Republicans enough. Plus he loves to use the comedian shyt to cover himself on some what do I know I'm just a comedian shyt. I still watch him at times. Just saying there are valid criticisms of him.
 
 
		 
 
		 and it is a lie. How can you not be a hack and a fraud if you do the very same thing and use the same narrative/attention grabbing tactics the mainstream media you claim you do not love uses.
 and it is a lie. How can you not be a hack and a fraud if you do the very same thing and use the same narrative/attention grabbing tactics the mainstream media you claim you do not love uses. Why constantly mention him when he never mentions you? It's just weird.
 Why constantly mention him when he never mentions you? It's just weird. 
 
 
		
 
 
		 that argument is embarrassing
 that argument is embarrassing

 I memba, mamba!
 I memba, mamba! 
 
		
 no, of course im not fukkin cool with that. where did that happen, and to how many people? THAT is a problem. THAT is rigging and interference. you need to separate it from the "russians mind-controlled americans" narrative
 no, of course im not fukkin cool with that. where did that happen, and to how many people? THAT is a problem. THAT is rigging and interference. you need to separate it from the "russians mind-controlled americans" narrative you would think they would....report that
you would think they would....report that late edit for dramatic effect
 late edit for dramatic effect that's proof that we have to tighten up our security for the next one
 that's proof that we have to tighten up our security for the next one the implications are bad going forward, but you're implying the past election was illegitimate because someone looked at voter rolls and didnt change anything. thats bullshyt
 the implications are bad going forward, but you're implying the past election was illegitimate because someone looked at voter rolls and didnt change anything. thats bullshyt 