It is an idealistic approach and of course like Pac said "They don't give a fukk about us." What I wanted to illustrate is the hypocrisy of fortunate people. They refuse to help the poor and lending a hand is a socialistic view but when those monsters ,they created, attack they act surprised or criticize.
Fortunate people help, stop with the lies. There are charities & plenty of middle class volunteers who help. My wife's company buys tickets to a lot of charity galas and is involved with a lot of outreach + charity work. Me + my wife + a lot of our friends volunteer regularly. There are a lot of non-profit orgs that do outreach and charity work.
"Why would you do that?"
"That's so stupid if that was me I'd do this, I'd do that"
People like to judge others and act as if they're impervious to the ways of the world. Some of us are lucky enough to never have to go through these struggles but yet we act as if we know exactly how to handle those situations.
Nobody is perfect and nobody claimed to be perfect. But does one have to be told that doing shyt like robbing people and selling drugs is wrong?
"Well they have wel-fare, they have medicare, they have free school, why can't they just pick themselves up by the bootstraps."
Nobody said that either, the point of mentioning that was to dispute the assertion that society doesn't help anyone.
As if the world is black and white. Yes, people overcome obstacles but not everyone is the same. Just because Allen Iverson, Jay-Z, or Hiphoplives4eva makes it out the hood doesn't mean they are the rule. It has to be case by case.
Why should it be case by case for these folks, when you claim all "fortunate" people are selfish hypocrites? Whose the real hypocrite here?
Now I'm not crying on some "These poor guys who is going to save them". People do have to be punished and disciplined when they do something wrong but there should also be a better chance to reform and help these people not commit those crimes again.
I think there are some problems with how the system deals with criminals, but again, EVERY criminal CHOSE to be a criminal, and even once they get out many make the CHOICE to get involved in that life of crime again. I have very close friends who have DIED because they chose not to leave that street life alone... and these were not poor kids, we grew up together in the same suburbs.
Also more attention NEEDS to be paid to poor schools. Getting to these people when they're children is a key factor in changing the future.
Schools can't succeed w/o input from parents, and a lot of the parents in these neighborhoods either don't give a damn or are too busy trying to survive to participate at the level they need to be for their kids to succeed.
We do live in a capitalistic society and that has to be some at the bottom to catch the shyt. Really the only way to help everyone would be to completely reinvent our current system but that won't happen till it's too late.
Everyone can't be "helped", and it seems silly to want to reinvent the wheel to prop up people who choose not to help themselves. I am not saying shyt is perfect or that society is 100% blameless... but the idea that all poor people are helpless victims of society is meaningless. If you get arrested because you were caught selling drugs or murdering someone or stealing from someone, you're not a victim, you're a criminal. Regardless of your background, you made a CHOICE, and have to face the consequences. Likewise you have a kid and don't work to get them the best education + preparation for life you can, you are making a CHOICE, and your kid's failure in life will be the CONSEQUENCE.
I also find it disturbing that people are hoping for the very same folks they claim aren't helping to be the ones to save them. SAVE YOURSELVES