If The Earth Is Flat Then What Shapes Are The Other Planets?

[xCivicx]

MLK and Flat earth aren't even on the same planet to compare.

Dawg...you can subjugate people without resorting to lying about something that predates recorded history.

I see there's other things fundamental to life that you're not clear on either. So I'll let you talk in circles.

Cool

Just remember that its yall that make these threads, not me

Clearly youre searching for something, but you seem terrified of actually finding it

I logically proved that the suns motion does not line up with heliocentric theory in this very thread

Im the only one actually applying math and physics in my posts

Yall are going off of what europeans tell yall, completely unable to prove anything by yourself

Keep posting those CGI vids though

 

[xCivicx]

Flight paths alone can prove earth is a ball.

You already know that we had an entire thread on planes and flight paths where i most definitely proved that they are not possible on a ball spinning at 1000mph

Feel free to reup that thread though

 

[xCivicx]

Flight paths alone can prove earth is a ball.

As a matter of fact

https://www.thecoli.com/threads/fla...point-of-lying-about-the-earths-shape.564755/

 

[KodeBlue]

You already know that we had an entire thread on planes and flight paths where i most definitely proved that they are not possible on a ball spinning at 1000mph

Feel free to reup that thread though

I don't remember that thread. Please refresh my memory. How is it not possible on a ball spinning 1000 mph?

edit*

I can't go through 43 pages of post. Can you refresh my memory as to how it isn't possible?

 

[xCivicx]

I don't remember that thread. Please refresh my memory. How is it not possible on a ball spinning 1000 mph?

I just relinked it

But one simple proof has to do with the coriolis effect

Co·ri·o·lis ef·fect
/ˌkôrēˈōləs iˌfekt/
noun
PHYSICS

1. an effect whereby a mass moving in a rotating system experiences a force (the Coriolis force ) acting perpendicular to the direction of motion and to the axis of rotation. On the earth, the effect tends to deflect moving objects to the right in the northern hemisphere and to the left in the southern and is important in the formation of cyclonic weather systems.

Which, according to heliocentric theory, states that once an object is no longer on the earths surface, its not moving at the same rate as the earth

This means that an eastward moving plane would have to fly at 1000 mph IN ADDITION to its cruise speed to actually move anywhere, because if its flying at less than the 1000mph that the earth is rotating at, its destination will constantly be rotating aeay from it

This also means that MOST westward flights would be MUCH faster than eastward flights

But if course, we dont observe this at all, and we even tracked multiple flights going east/west and west/east in that previous thread and they proved my point

Im just applying simple logic

 

[null]

Those pictures are wildly inaccurate





























Pluto isn't a planet anymore

NASA scientists want to make Pluto a planet again

 

[Vandelay]

Cool

Just remember that its yall that make these threads, not me

Clearly youre searching for something, but you seem terrified of actually finding it

I logically proved that the suns motion does not line up with heliocentric theory in this very thread

Im the only one actually applying math and physics in my posts

Yall are going off of what europeans tell yall, completely unable to prove anything by yourself

Keep posting those CGI vids though

Bruh, you're mixing sidereal and solar days up. Both are based on our relative perception of how the sun and stars move around us. The length of a sidereal day has nothing to do with whether the earth is flat or not.

 

[Devilinurear]

The breh here is being facetious, but this post is actually 100% true

 

[null]

I own a telescope, I watch the moon rotate on a regular basis. This post is easily proven wrong for $50 and a few hours on a clear night. People figured out moon phases almost the same time they figured out written language. Hustling backwards on purpose is not wavy

"plant"

- flatt errrfur..

 

[Chez Lopez]

It is funny that no other poster can imagine a reality besides the one shown on tv. actually, its not funny at all.

 

[KodeBlue]

I just relinked it

But one simple proof has to do with the coriolis effect



Which, according to heliocentric theory, states that once an object is no longer on the earths surface, its not moving at the same rate as the earth

This means that an eastward moving plane would have to fly at 1000 mph IN ADDITION to its cruise speed to actually move anywhere, because if its flying at less than the 1000mph that the earth is rotating at, its destination will constantly be rotating aeay from it

This also means that MOST westward flights would be MUCH faster than eastward flights

But if course, we dont observe this at all, and we even tracked multiple flights going east/west and west/east in that previous thread and they proved my point

Im just applying simple logic

So If you can fly a drone on a moving vehicle, that will cancel out your theory, correct? If the drone doesn't fly straight to the back of the moving vehicle, then it would have disproven your post. The experiment is more likely to fail due to the fact that a vehicle is likely to change speed, direct, velocity.

 

[Devilinurear]

It is funny that no other poster can imagine a reality besides the one shown on tv. actually, its not funny at all.

But won't different shows be a different reality?

 

[KodeBlue]

Bruh, you're mixing sidereal and solar days up. Both are based on our relative perception of how the sun and stars move around us. The length of a sidereal day has nothing to do with whether the earth is flat or not.

Good point

 

[Copy Ninja]

Man, I saw a jpeg a few years back that had all the planet as spherical shapes and when it you got to Earth that mf was flat. Shyt had me

I wish I'd save it.

 

[Vandelay]

It is funny that no other poster can imagine a reality besides the one shown on tv. actually, its not funny at all.

No, it's actually not funny when we can't come to terms on what is reality when looking at verifiable information everyone has had access to for thousands of years.