It's funny because the 2 entities you just mentioned to prove are real....are sphere. same as the starts. so wtf are you talking about.
and wtf, what entity? prove there is an entity.
If The Earth Is Flat Then What Shapes Are The Other Planets?
- Thread starter KyokushinKarateMan
- Start date
and wtf, what entity? prove there is an entity.
Every time they actually try to use science correctly, they prove the globe......
'Interesting'............
This guy in the video is acting like he stumbled on some mindblowing round earth proof that he can't release to the world.
Why is it NASA and other space agencies have thousands of images of the earth but flat earthers only have photoshops and drawings? This is why I say they should put a camera on a rocket so we can stop going around in circles and see their proof in real life.
Gimme some Flat earth astronauts making hand shadow puppets in front of the holograms!
Im asking questions that literally utilize the principles of motion to disprove heliocentric theoryI already have:
In here asking dumb questions like the one about the speed of cloud’s movement ignoring all principles of relative motion, praying I follow you down a rabbit hole of ignorance. Not gonna happen
There’s no logical reason why the lands of the earth couldn’t be mapped out in a single image if the world was flat.
At this point it seems like youre just trolling me for attention, so im probably gonna stop responding to you
Once again, what you're arguing is in exact opposition to what @KodeBlue is arguingThey would not have to be moving at 1001 mph to appear to be moving left. What I said completely makes sense with regards to a frame of reference. That's physics 1&3 stuff breh. Again, think about it. If I'm moving at a rate of 1000 mph to the right while another object is moving at 900 mph to the right, then from my frame of reference it will appear to be moving left at 100 mph. After 1 hour, it's 100 miles behind me, after 2 hours it's 200 miles behind me, and so on and so on...
And yes there are plenty of meteorological events that could affect the velocity of cloud movement such as rising warm and cold fronts. I would go into how all of that happens but I know how you feel about gravity so I'll refrain. At least we can both accept that hurricanes, tornadoes, and noreasters are real.
Speaking of meteorology, are there any models that use a flat earth? I'm sure someone could make millions since the spherical model is only right 75% of the time
I think yall need to get on the same page and try this thing together
He seems to believe that the earth/atmosphere combined are a closed system
Do you believe this or not?
And the mapping of the stars/constellations that we still look to today, was done on the flat earth model
Who is also a fan of mine that follows me around begging for my attention
So youre both a fan and a fan of a fan
Different wind streams move clouds in all directions on the flat unmoving earth
If all clouds were spinning at 1000 mph, in a closed system with the earth, they would only ever be able to to move one direction
If the system is not closed and clouds can "drift", that means that east flying planes would constantly need to account for the fact that their destination is rotating away from them at 1000 mph, meaning said planes would have to fly at 1000+ mph to make any headway
It doesnt work either way on the globe earth model. This what im trying to get yall to understand
Yall are funnyI know what sarcasm is and how it is used, however you said:
The irony here is that you have alluded to the fact there is a FE map and sarcasm is the most vicious form of irony
But why won't you take @Dafunkdoc_Unlimited off ignore, if you are going to attempt to kick knowledge why create an echo chamber?
Im gonna go ahead and stop responding to now since youre basically talking in circles and essentially trolling me
lol, dude's lack of the grasp of scale is breathtaking
Lol @ stars being static. No dummy
Lol @ stars being static. No dummy
He's not arguing the opposite of what I'm saying. He's referring to two moving objects, I talked about ground speed (as I was given limited information to go on to provide an answer), and you're arguing the rotation of the earth.
You just proved my point again
Light cant "curve" around the curvature of the earth
If you look at a street light, then raise a piece of paper up to the point where its only blocking the bulb itself, you can still see light rays shining above that piece of paper because light rays are "light"(as in not heavy) and they travel extremely far distances
The paper represents the horizon in that scenario
Again, who is "they"???
If the moon is a hologram then it was put there by the same intelligent entity that created us, not humans
Ive already proven my side on page 3 in this thread with respect to sidereal days and how the suns motion doesnt match up to what the concept of sidereal days mandate
Its funny how selective yall are when it comes to what posts yall choose to respond to