If The Earth Is Flat Then What Shapes Are The Other Planets?

xCivicx

Veteran
Joined
Dec 29, 2016
Messages
24,547
Reputation
2,725
Daps
78,846
Reppin
Atl
It's funny because the 2 entities you just mentioned to prove are real....are sphere. same as the starts. so wtf are you talking about.

and wtf, what entity? prove there is an entity.
The sun and moon are not sphere

Again, yall dont know basic shapes at all and its sad

You can clearly see that the sun and moon are CIRCULAR, which is a 2 DIMENSIONAL detonation

You cannot prove that the sun and moon are SPHERES, which is a 3 DIMENSIONAL denotation

And the fact that humans have only seen 1 side of the moon hurts your case even more

You BELIEVE that the sun and moon are spheres but you cant PROVE it
 

Devilinurear

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
26,611
Reputation
5,742
Daps
87,256
Reppin
NULL
The sun and moon are not sphere

Again, yall dont know basic shapes at all and its sad

You can clearly see that the sun and moon are CIRCULAR, which is a 2 DIMENSIONAL detonation

You cannot prove that the sun and moon are SPHERES, which is a 3 DIMENSIONAL denotation

And the fact that humans have only seen 1 side of the moon hurts your case even more

You BELIEVE that the sun and moon are spheres but you cant PROVE it


How would you prove they spheres?
 

xCivicx

Veteran
Joined
Dec 29, 2016
Messages
24,547
Reputation
2,725
Daps
78,846
Reppin
Atl
This guy in the video is acting like he stumbled on some mindblowing round earth proof that he can't release to the world.:mjlol:

Why is it NASA and other space agencies have thousands of images of the earth but flat earthers only have photoshops and drawings? This is why I say they should put a camera on a rocket so we can stop going around in circles and see their proof in real life.
Gimme some Flat earth astronauts making hand shadow puppets in front of the holograms!:gladbron:
NASA has 0 real images of earth

They are ALL computer generated

Even Nasa has admitted this

zz1%252B%2525282%252529.jpg


The size of the continents change from picture to picture

The earth is depicted as a perfect sphere in all these picture even though your high priest neil degrasse tyson has decreed that the earth is actually an "oblate pear-shaped spheroid" which looks nothing at all like a perfect sphere

Yall gotta huddle up and try and find some consistency, sheesh
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
44,816
Reputation
8,179
Daps
121,949
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
xCivicx said:
Notice how every single fan of mine in here has talked around all of my posts:mjgrin:

I'm no fan, but I've refuted each of your nonsense posts in this thread.​

It's really easy since I don't have to rely on youtube scholars for arguments.​

You can't see these posts, but that makes no difference as I can actually show and prove while you just Juelz.​

:sas2:
 

xCivicx

Veteran
Joined
Dec 29, 2016
Messages
24,547
Reputation
2,725
Daps
78,846
Reppin
Atl
You could have been more specific. I gave you an in-depth answer, and you called it semantics.
I was really just asking you how its even possible for a cloud in a closed system to move in random directions
 

xCivicx

Veteran
Joined
Dec 29, 2016
Messages
24,547
Reputation
2,725
Daps
78,846
Reppin
Atl
lol, dude's lack of the grasp of scale is breathtaking

Lol @ stars being static. No dummy


According to heliocentrism, everything in "outer space" is movng away from each other

The lack of any drastic changes to the parallax with respect to the stars(which SHOULD be happening if everything is expanding away from eachother) over CENTURIES, proves that we are stationary and the celestial bodies rotate above us with divine regularity
 

xCivicx

Veteran
Joined
Dec 29, 2016
Messages
24,547
Reputation
2,725
Daps
78,846
Reppin
Atl
He's not arguing the opposite of what I'm saying. He's referring to two moving objects, I talked about ground speed (as I was given limited information to go on to provide an answer), and you're arguing the rotation of the earth.
But you were the one who posited that the atmosphere and the earth are in a closed system when you posted that video of the drone inside an airplane, correct?
 

xCivicx

Veteran
Joined
Dec 29, 2016
Messages
24,547
Reputation
2,725
Daps
78,846
Reppin
Atl
Yet I've already explained that planes move within the atmosphere in the same manner a drone would in a moving vehicle.
Meaning you think that we are in a closed system

And once again, if we are in a closee system, that means that a cloud would have to be moving 1001 mph west in order to offset the rotation of the earth 1000 mph east, and give the appearance of moving 1 mph west to a person observing from the ground

Im not sure why im having to repeat this so many times...
 

KodeBlue

Banned
Joined
Jul 5, 2012
Messages
6,814
Reputation
-577
Daps
16,838
Reppin
Baltimore
Ive already proven my side on page 3 in this thread with respect to sidereal days and how the suns motion doesnt match up to what the concept of sidereal days mandate

Its funny how selective yall are when it comes to what posts yall choose to respond to

I don't even see a post you on page 3. A flat earther could pick a sidereal day argument apart, or at least easily refute it. A Solar Day is harder to explain using the flat earth model.
 

xCivicx

Veteran
Joined
Dec 29, 2016
Messages
24,547
Reputation
2,725
Daps
78,846
Reppin
Atl
I don't even see a post you on page 3. A flat earther could pick a sidereal day argument apart, or at least easily refute it. A Solar Day is harder to explain using the flat earth model.
Huh??

Please elaborate
 

-G$-

...fresh outta fux...
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
8,267
Reputation
3,801
Daps
22,432
Screw it. I got time today, so I'm going to refute EACH and every post he's made in this thread one-by-one that hasn't already been refuted by some other poster.........:sas1:



ORLY? Here are a few pics of the 'Dark Side' of the Moon taken by various Nations over the last 60 years......

Soviet Luna 3 in 1959......

Luna_3_moon.jpg


NASA's Lunar Orbiter IV, taken in 1967.....​


LRC-1967-B701_P-04825_large.jpg


Apollo 16........

Back_side_of_the_Moon_AS16-3021.jpg


NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, 2009........

528087main_031110a.jpg


China's Chang'e-4........

RTX6KORI.jpg


Israel's Beresheet probe......

56158184_2236692406373581_6484682360989155328_o.jpg


:sas2:



The Moon doesn't rotate? ORLY?.......................:sas1:

The Moon rotates ONCE every 27 days on it's axis. It's called 'synchronous rotation'.

This will also explain how tides work.....



:sas2:


:sas1:

This is false. There would be NO horizon were the Earth Flat. The Earth would just fade into obscurity (vanishing point, NOT 'Flerspective') and there would be no easily discernible line of division between the Earth and the sky.

:sas2:

:sas1:

No, you have posted nonsense masquerading as math that shows how woefully incompetent, ignorant, and logically invalid your entire argument is. You can't disprove the heliocentric theory with math because you don't understand the heliocentric theory OR math. The Sun does not rotate above us, the Earth rotates on it's axis while the Sun remains stationary in-relation to it while, itself, rotating/orbiting along the galaxy's axis. Proof of this is the Analemma, a phenomenon which could ONLY occur if the Earth were rotating.....

lossy-page1-1200px-Analemma_fishburn.tif.jpg


Now, if you wish to stick to your 'The Sun rotates above the Earth' argument, you'd have to present some explanation as to how the Sun moves in this objectively observable manner......which would debunk every other argument you may put forward.

:sas2:

:sas1:

You ARE mixing up terms because you, yourself, don't comprehend them fully. A sidereal day is one Earth rotation in relation to the stars/constellations.

A solar day is one Earth rotation in relation to Sol.

We use sidereal days to track celestial bodies.

We use solar days to track time on Earth.

You are wrong and your argument is null and void.

:sas2:

:sas1:

You are wrong on so many levels it's amazing you can find your way home from the nursery school you attend without an escort. Anyhow, the heliocentric model doesn't state that once an object is no longer on the surface it isn't moving at the same rate as Earth because of the effect.

The Coriolis Effect, according to the Heliocentric Model, is a force caused by the Earth's rotation which causes air to deflect to the right in the Northern Hemisphere, and the left in the Southern, which causes curved pathways that influence weather patterns. The Effect was named after French mathematician Gaspard Gustave de Coriolis who studied these patterns back in the 19th Century.

You are NOT applying 'simple logic' at all, but are advertising your ignorance

:sas2:

:sas1:

The Coriolis Effect actually proves the globe. The Flat Earth has NO way to account for it, test it, or make predictions for objectively observable phenomena that doesn't contradict or outright invalidate any other Flat Earth claim to 'reality'.

There is NO Flat Earth model because it's a fantasy easily refuted by evidence, logic, reason, math, and the proper application of the scientific method.

:sas2:

:sas1:

Every time they actually try to use science correctly, they prove the globe......



:sas2:

'Interesting'............:mjlol:


extremely compelling counter points @Dafunkdoc_Unlimited :ohhh:
 
Top