Eli wasn't throwing to HOFers either like Peyton was. And Indy did have a great Defense with Bob Sanders and Freeney but Peyton normally choked in the postseason.
Also, the most yards Peyton ever thew in a season was 4,700 and Eli threw for 4,900 last season
. Eli's weapons were obviously good enough to win the SB with. It's not like they won or he put up numbers despite his receivers. It's not like nikkas were dropping all kinds of passes and struggling to get open. It's not like Eli made them hold on to the ball. They made the plays that had to be made when they had to be made. I also find it funny how people always talk about Peyton's weapons and his playoff failures and never talk about how those two things intertwine. nikkas never talk about how normally sure handed nikkas would catch a mysterious case of the drops when subjected to physical playoff football or how they would struggle to get open or make big mistakes. Nope all you hear it Peyton had weapons and didn't win. 
Peyton has been the more consistent and prolific player. Eli has been more fortunate. Not even gonna front on Eli though, he's really taken his game to a new level in the last couple of years and become far more consistent. He'd need another decade or so of that to beat his brother out.
This has to be the worst argument ever constructed. Every time I see it
Manning has definitely had his share of struggles, but that right there is just amazing.
So would he be better than every QB that only one 1 or 2 superbowls too or those that never won? (Montana, Young, or Marino)