@Dave24 (cont):
My step-dad grew up in Little Rock and was 19 when he saw Mike's Heels get upset by the Hogs in person in '84 (he actually saw Mike and UNC's morning practice at his school too), and he followed Mike's entire career from that point forward. When I got into basketball heavy in my preteen and teens, so we're going early 00s here, we had conversations where my dad told me he respected Mike as one of the GOATs but not of some lane to himself, and explained his reasoning behind it (said he was a Dr J clone, and if The Doc didn't waste his first 5 years or so in ABA he'd have 6 rings too; said any Top 10 player could take Mike's place on the 90s Bulls and win those same championships, because even if styles of play were different, All-Timers have the "it" factor to make their team better, etc). He wasn't a Mike hater, he always said once Mike hit his peak he was the best player in the NBA. He just didn't respect how people said he was the greatest player ever with no competition for that label, when he'd been watching the sport since the mid-70s...
My dad is 55 now and we revisited the whole Mike thing 6 months ago when Last Dance dropped and he still feels the same: Mike is easily one of the GOATs to him but not THE GOAT, and once he saw Kobe hit his peak, then later LeBron, he saw two guys who could be just as decorated as Jordan if given the same circumstances because he didn't see Jordan as a better basketball player by any valuable margin...
So bringing it back to Bron, because I was never under the impression Mike was the highest bar or unrivaled GOAT, I never had the impression LeBron had a particular mountain to climb to reach Mike. Of course, as I started studying the game more and fleshing out my opinions, I did come to believe Mike was the best previous player, but not better than LeBron...
So while after the '13 Finals Bron was clearly Top 10 GOAT to me, '16 is the earliest I remember saying "damn this nikka the greatest player ever", so that would have to be when he passed Mike to, even though I didn't specifically match him with Mike in my brain. That was yet
another All-Time Finals performance, and a completely unprecedented one, against a 90s Bulls-esque team. Those last three games were nothing short of an iconic performance. At that point, we were watching Bron in his 6th straight Finals and pulling of his 3rd win in 5 years...
So he'd put his team in Finals contention and made a Finals run earlier than Mike without a Pippen or Jackson to help him ('07). He went on a run to 6 straight Finals with two different teams without needing a mental reset/retirement along the way, that was a display of unrivaled mental toughness. He bounced back from a lower low than Mike ever had ('11), to go on a run paralleling Mike's against stronger competition, and hitting arguably a higher high than Mike ever had ('16 Finals); notwithstanding he wasnt far removed from winning 4 MVPs in 5 years, being snubbed a DPOY, being snubbed one or both the '11 or '14 MVP, dude legitimately coulda won 6 MVPs in a row....
I think all of these things in combination made it clear to me, that at the floor I was watching Mike's 1:1 equal, at best I was watching something greater than Mike. As previously mentioned though, I see the argument for Bron over Mike, but to me its mainly the fact he never had the '11 meltdown moment while being able to match Bron's highs. Thats the differentiator if I'm arguing for Mike...
I was never into ring counting to determine who was best so '16 was when I'd have to say he passed Mike to me. And everything since has probably just underscored that perspective and solidified it, but to be clear they are the two in my opinion who stand over everyone and I'm not mad at people who have Mike #1 as long as the argument isn't some agenda-driven shyt (6 rings, tougher era, mentally tougher, unbeatable, shyt like that)...