Ice Trae The Gang: Official 2018 Atlanta Hawks Offseason Thread

Who should the Hawks take at #3?


  • Total voters
    55
  • Poll closed .

BlackMajik

Behind Enemy Lines
Joined
Dec 26, 2012
Messages
41,071
Reputation
10,818
Daps
214,865
Reppin
DSGB(Down South Georgia Boy)
Hawks interested in Michael Beasley apparently
tVdHg.gif
:huhldup:
 

Stone

Superstar
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
14,856
Reputation
656
Daps
29,511
Reppin
NULL
:picard:
I don't wanna be the Raptors :francis:

Isn't that why we're rebuilding now? Because we got tired of being that "better constructed team"
Ascending to championship contention in the nba has a lot more luck involved than people want to admit.

Chances are this rebuild is gonna land us back where we were
 
Last edited:

AVXL

Laughing at you n*ggaz like “ha ha ha”
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
40,829
Reputation
645
Daps
76,371
Reppin
Of course the ATL
There was absolutely no reason to pick the Cavs to win shyt other than “they got Bron”. There was really nothing else to factor :pachaha:I don’t want my GM thinking “well, they got suchnsuch so there’s no way anybody is gonna beat them”. If that’s how he thinks, then how are we gonna compete in the next 10 years? Because we’re not gonna get any one player better than Bron, Simmons/Embiid, or Giannis. Golden State pre-KD won because they had the best TEAM on the court, not the best player(depending on how you feel about Curry). I’ll take a GM who believes that the best team on the court will beat the worse team with the better player over one that chases(and almost certainly fails to get) one superstar to solve all our problems. :yeshrug:

I disagree. Part of his job as GM is to assess talent, to factor in psychological evaluations and competitiveness and how that translates for a player/team into his/their performance on the court. You can't look at players or teams in a vacuum of "oh they have the better team so that's the main factor of determining who should win". Based off of prior history between the two teams, what we in the general public know and the fact that in the playoffs the team with the better player generally wins. That should've been a signal for him when determining who should've won the CLE/TOR series. I want a GM who factors in everything and thinks outside the box when constructing a team or assessing a team's chances. I'd be disappointed if he thought about it any other way than that.

I don’t either but being the Raptors wouldn’t be so bad if Bron didn’t keep Lowry and Derozan’s nuts in a jar in his garage. You can forecast talent, but there’s no test to determine heart :francis:

You can't forecast how these players will play in the playoffs or even if the players you draft will pan out, but I'm trusting Schlenk to have a general sense of how these intangibles like competitiveness, heart, toughness will translate into games. I don't think that's unreasonable or unfair to expect from the GM
 

O.iatlhawksfan

Devoted Joel Embiid hater
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
37,571
Reputation
730
Daps
63,376
Reppin
New Orleans
Ascending to championship contention in the nba has a lot more luck involved than people want to admit.

Chances are this rebuild is gonna land us back where we were
Can always take the Philly approach and keep tanking to we land generational talent
 

Rekkapryde

GT, LWO, 49ERS, BRAVES, HAWKS, N4O...yeah UMAD!
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
148,433
Reputation
26,489
Daps
498,856
Reppin
TYRONE GA!
Ascending to championship contention in the nba has a lot more luck involved than people want to admit.

Yup, nikkaz wanna clown and be mad but look at the Warriors :mjcry:

Steph got picked 7th
Klay got picked 11th
Draymond got picked 35th
Harrison Barnes was picked 7th (he blew that 2016 Finals more than anyone).
 

Professor K.

rap game Paul Millsap
Joined
Sep 5, 2013
Messages
7,837
Reputation
2,203
Daps
30,615
Reppin
Atlanta, GA
I disagree. Part of his job as GM is to assess talent, to factor in psychological evaluations and competitiveness and how that translates for a player/team into his/their performance on the court. You can't look at players or teams in a vacuum of "oh they have the better team so that's the main factor of determining who should win". Based off of prior history between the two teams, what we in the general public know and the fact that in the playoffs the team with the better player generally wins. That should've been a signal for him when determining who should've won the CLE/TOR series. I want a GM who factors in everything and thinks outside the box when constructing a team or assessing a team's chances. I'd be disappointed if he thought about it any other way than that.



You can't forecast how these players will play in the playoffs or even if the players you draft will pan out, but I'm trusting Schlenk to have a general sense of how these intangibles like competitiveness, heart, toughness will translate into games. I don't think that's unreasonable or unfair to expect from the GM

What’s unreasonable and unfair is assessing his entire qualification of being a GM based on who he picked to win a 2nd round playoff series :ld: I see what you saying but in the end he picked the #1 seed with two perineal all-stars, solid roleplayers, and a deep bench over a team that probably wouldn’t make the playoffs without their star player in his 15th season who needed to be playing out of his damn mind for them to beat the Indiana fukkin Pacers in 7 games. He’s not the only one in the league/media/world who thought that and it’s crazy to nitpick his entire validity as a talent evaluator based on that
 
Top