The Dinobots on Transformers RULED
I finally saw the OG Jurassic Park (1993) and it's the whitest movie I've ever seen.
- Thread starter Remote
- Start date
ROBEEZYKILLA
the coli soulja
Classic movie saw it in theaters as a child game changer fukk you talking bout?
It was based on a Michael Crichton novel. Dude was a pos but he had some classics
You may have to make an appointment with a professional..that's just abnormal and borderline psychotic for a kid
DreadBrown
Feed the children
I never gone back to the og as an adult so I just put this on as background while I work
Black guy gets eaten by dino within the first 3 mins
I forgot all about this 90’s ‘black guy dies first’ bullshyt
Black guy gets eaten by dino within the first 3 mins
I forgot all about this 90’s ‘black guy dies first’ bullshyt
DetroitEWarren
Superstar
Funny. I would have assumed that most Air Fakkits were born post 2005I’m a 80s baby, 90s child. We all loved jurassic Park. Black or white it didn’t matter
Devilinurear
Veteran
Dusty Detroit , I thought I smelled your musty ass
. The bum with zero hands
I would punish you in the fair one then make you film a tearful apology for the coli.
Formerly Black Trash
Philosopher, Connoisseur, Future Legend
Hating on jurassic classic is crazy
The later somebody see's a movie than everyone else. The more leftfield their opinions on it are.
I suspect thats the case because if they just echoed the consensus some 30 years later nobody would care.
So they have to say something more contratrian to get attention
Poetical Poltergeist
Precise and cold hearted
I remember my dad being like, the movie is called Jurassic Park and they running around a kitchen lmao
He wasn't too impressed back in the day. Now I understand.
Or maybe great movies, great acting, great writing, a great premise, and a great plot stand the test of time.
When you saw 12 Angry Men, that movie was probably a solid 50 years old. And it was still great, right?
It's been 26 years since Saving Private Ryan, still great, right?
The point is clear.
Thats one theory, but if they were flawed in these aspects why does it need time for people to tell?
why are these unique opinions are never expressed closer to the time the movie was released in?
Like i said nobody cares if you give the same review ebert gave in 1993, some 30 years later. Only way to get attention for a 30 year overdue is if it is extremely contrarian.
null
...
OP
it's here.
www.sciencealert.com
it's here.
Organic Material Detected in Eggshell Fossils Could Unlock Dinosaur Secrets
As a scientist, lab work can sometimes get monotonous.
www.sciencealert.com
Being contrarian would only have merit if you could prove I was only saying it for attention.
I'm curious why you think this isn't my genuine opinion that this movie's premise was ridiculous.
Because so many other people enjoyed it? Not good enough.
